[Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Pauli Virtanen
19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: [clip] Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. First, there wasn't a Cython-refactor of NumPy. There was a Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure of it's current status. I'm still very supportive of that sort of thing.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: [clip] Sure.  This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. First, there wasn't a Cython-refactor of NumPy.   There was a Cython-refactor of SciPy.   I'm not sure of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy Cython refactor

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: [clip] Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. First, there wasn't a Cython-refactor of NumPy. There was a Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure of