On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:03 AM, James Bergstra
bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
If anyone is interested in my ongoing API bytecode adventure in why
/ how lazy computing could be useful, I've put together a few tiny
hypothetically-runnable examples here:
Hi all, (sorry for missing the debate, I don't often check my
numpy-list folder.)
I agree that an official numpy solution to this problem is
premature, but at the same time I think the failure to approach
anything remotely resembling a consensus on how to deal with lazy
evaluation is really
On 06/06/2012 12:06 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 22:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/05/2012 10:47 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
Hey,
Another discussion on lazy evaluation, given the recent activity here:
https://github.com/ContinuumIO/numba/pull/6#issuecomment-6117091
A somewhat recent previous thread can be found here:
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-February/060862.html
, and a NEP here:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if we implement the NEP listed above, but with a few
extensions. I think Numpy should handle the lazy evaluation part, and
determine when expressions should be evaluated, etc. However, for each
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if we implement the NEP listed above, but with a few
extensions. I think Numpy should handle the lazy evaluation part, and
determine
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if we implement the NEP listed above, but with a few
Would lazy eval be able to eliminate temps in doing operations such as:
np.sum (u != 23)?
That is, now ops involving selecting elements of matrixes are often performed
by
first constructing temp matrixes, and the operating on them.
___
On 5 June 2012 18:21, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Would lazy eval be able to eliminate temps in doing operations such as:
np.sum (u != 23)?
That is, now ops involving selecting elements of matrixes are often performed
by
first constructing temp matrixes, and the operating on
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June
On 06/05/2012 10:47 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
On 5 June 2012 22:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/05/2012 10:47 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38,
14 matches
Mail list logo
