On Monday, October 1, 2012, Chris Barker wrote:
Paul,
Nice to see someone working on these issues, but:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
But if you do want to improve that, it may be better
On 3. okt. 2012, at 17:48, Wes McKinney wrote:
On Monday, October 1, 2012, Chris Barker wrote:
Paul,
Nice to see someone working on these issues, but:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
On 1. okt. 2012, at 21:07, Chris Barker wrote:
Paul,
Nice to see someone working on these issues, but:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
Oh, there's significant overhead, since we're not
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Paul Anton Letnes
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
Oh, there's significant overhead, since we're not talking of a list - we're
On 3. okt. 2012, at 18:22, Chris Barker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Paul Anton Letnes
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
Oh, there's significant
Paul,
Nice to see someone working on these issues, but:
I'm not sure the problem you are trying to solve -- accumulating in a
list is pretty efficient anyway -- not a whole lot overhead.
But if you do want to improve that, it may be better to change the
accumulating method, rather than doing
For convenience and clarity, this is the diff in question:
https://github.com/Dynetrekk/numpy-1/commit/5bde67531a2005ef80a2690a75c65cebf97c9e00
And this is my numpy fork:
https://github.com/Dynetrekk/numpy-1/
Paul
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com
