Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any further

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-23 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 4/20/2011 1:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Christoph Gohlkecgoh...@uci.edu  wrote: On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-22 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any further with this?) - #1801: test_noncentral_f failure on win64 - #1798: type

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:54 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any further with this?) - #1801:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-20 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 4/20/2011 1:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Christoph Gohlkecgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-19 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Droettboom
I think I just found a reference leak in the reduction ufunc code that was exercised by some of the matplotlib regression tests. You may want to look at this before cutting a release: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/76 Cheers, Mike On 04/17/2011 11:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, The

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-17 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any further with this?) - #1801: test_noncentral_f failure on win64 - #1798: type promotion regression (needs review,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

2011-04-17 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any further with this?) I could reproduce on another machine (MAC OS X, different