Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 64

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread William Ray Wing
On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe [byte] For Mac there is first the question of OS X versions,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: New summary 1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked with MKL These should be good for both windows

[Numpy-discussion] Unexpected casting result

2013-09-16 Thread Warren Weckesser
An unexpected casting result was just reported on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18833639/attributeerror-in-python-numpy-when-constructing-function-for-certain-values The following show the essence of the issue: In [1]: np.__version__ Out[1]: '1.9.0.dev-6ce65d8' In [2]:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: New summary 1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Charles R Harris
New summary 1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked with MKL These should be good for both windows 7 and window 8. For Mac there is first the question of OS X versions, (10.5?), 10.6,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: New summary 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked with MKL These should be good for both windows 7 and window 8.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article 8e95a257-3f06-43b7-8407-95916d284...@mac.com, William Ray Wing w...@mac.com wrote: On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which binary builds so put up

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: New summary 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Peter Cock
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As you know I'm 110% in favor of getting rid of it, but 1.8 is ready to go and 1.9 is coming soon enough, and the old and terrible system does work right

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:31 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread William Ray Wing
On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 16.09.2013 16:31, William Ray Wing kirjoitti: [clip] If you will forgive an observation from a Mac user and (amateur) developer. I have twice tried to build Numpy from source and both times failed. The problem was that I couldn't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article cabl7cqg5vv_vnp0hbdx+ys6gt0npwqehth3mwb6j65ow9+1...@mail.gmail.com, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: New summary 1. 32 bit windows,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Unexpected casting result

2013-09-16 Thread Warren Weckesser
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Warren Weckesser warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote: An unexpected casting result was just reported on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18833639/attributeerror-in-python-numpy-when-constructing-function-for-certain-values The following show

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As you know I'm 110% in favor of getting rid of it, but 1.8 is ready to go and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Russell E. Owen ro...@uw.edu wrote: In article cabl7cqg5vv_vnp0hbdx+ys6gt0npwqehth3mwb6j65ow9+1...@mail.gmail.com, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Chris Barker
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Another question is, can we start distributing wheels yet? yes, yes, yes -- though maybe not for the beta testing. wheels will never catch on , or even get debugged if none of us use them. -Chris -- Christopher

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Chris Barker
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:31 AM, William Ray Wing w...@mac.com wrote: If you will forgive an observation from a Mac user and (amateur) developer. I have twice tried to build Numpy from source and both times failed. The problem was that I couldn't find a single comprehensive set of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Chris Barker
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote: Doing that right is important not just for SciPy but for any other downstream package including C code compiled against the NumPy C API (and the people doing this probably will only have access to free compilers).

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

2013-09-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:31 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R