Hello,
numpy.divide(0.0,0.0) raises a warning which doesn't appear to get caught
by numpy.seterr(divide='ignore')
This example:
import numpy
numpy.divide(0.0,0.0)
numpy.divide(1.0,0.0)
numpy.seterr(divide='ignore')
numpy.divide(1.0,0.0)
numpy.divide(0.0,0.0)
produces this output:
Warning
On Monday, September 23, 2013, Lorenzo Di Gregorio wrote:
Hello,
numpy.divide(0.0,0.0) raises a warning which doesn't appear to get caught
by numpy.seterr(divide='ignore')
This example:
import numpy
numpy.divide(0.0,0.0)
numpy.divide(1.0,0.0)
numpy.seterr(divide='ignore')
Does numpy/scipy support building with openblas for blas,lapack instead of
atlas?
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 09/23/2013 02:27 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Does numpy/scipy support building with openblas for blas,lapack instead of
atlas?
I have that working myself. I think it was simply a matter of using the
configuration below; NumPy will think it is ATLAS, but that doesn't matter.
Once NumPy is built
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
On 23.09.2013, at 7:03PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take place
On 23.09.2013, at 7:03PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take place on 9/28. Scream now or
never...
The only thing I'd care about is the nd_image subpackage,
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take place on 9/28. Scream now or
never...
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
integers and use their binary representation.
St?fan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130923/e4f56af4/attachment-0001.html
___
NumPy
We at STScI have no objection. If we have any residual dependencies, we'll then
find out and fix them.
Perry
On Sep 23, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Mark Szepieniec mszep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see a reason that numpy.random shouldn't get new
distributions. It would also be useful to add the corresponding
distribution to scipy.stats.
I
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take place on 9/28. Scream now or
never...
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
Could you clarify how we'd
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
packages. Consequently the removal will take
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have gotten no feedback on the
Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and -static-libgfortran
- building numpy went ok, test suite almost passes, nothing
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:22 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and
17 matches
Mail list logo
