On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just as a sanity check, do the scipy tests run without producing any
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I built some pristine python 2.7 installs from scratch (no virtualenv,
no distro tweaks, etc.). Then I installed some version of numpy in
each
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Thouis Jones thouis.jo...@curie.fr wrote:
I wondered, however, if there were a better way to accomplish the same
goal, preferably in pure python.
Fabien recently posted this; not
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The motivation behind splitting the mask out into a separate ndmasked is
primarily so that pre-existing code will not silently function on NA-masked
arrays and produce incorrect results. This centres around using PyArray_DATA
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, David Cournapeau
Hi all,
Since Mark's original missingdata branch made so many changes, I
figured it would be a useful exercise to figure out what code in
master is actually related to masked arrays, and which isn't. The
easiest way seemed to be to delete the new fields, then keep removing
any code that depended
On May 19, 2012 11:04 PM, Tim Cera t...@cerazone.net wrote:
A user would then install a language kit, maybe something like scikits
and access the translated docstring with a new 'np.info'. As near as I can
figure, Python 'help' command can't be replaced by something else, so
'help' would always
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Wow, Nathaniel. This looks like a nice piece of tedious work.
Honestly, it only took a few hours -- M-x grep is awesome. Would still
have been better if it'd been separated in the first place, but so it
goes.
I have
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Ralf, IIUC merging this and my other outstanding PRs would leave the
datetime issues on python3/win32 as the only outstanding blocker
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I have not reviewed it in detail, but in general I would be very supportive
of your plan to commit this to master, make a 1.7 release (without the
ReduceWrapper) function and then work on the masked array / ndarray
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thinking about what languages to translate into would also make sense, since
having a bunch of partial translations lying around doesn't help anyone.
First thought: Spanish, Chinese.
It's not like one can tell
I got tired of juggling virtualenvs, and probably everyone else would
soon get tired of pointing out Python 2.4 incompatibilities I'd
forgotten to test, so:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/285
- N
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
So starting in Python 2.7 and 3.2, the Python developers have made
DeprecationWarnings invisible by default:
http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.7.html#the-future-for-python-2-x
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/2009-November/000789.html
http://bugs.python.org/issue7319
The only way
PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I have not reviewed it in detail, but in general I would be very
supportive of your plan to commit this to master, make a 1.7 release
(without the ReduceWrapper) function and then work
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So starting in Python 2.7 and 3.2, the Python developers have made
DeprecationWarnings invisible by default:
http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.7
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Tom Aldcroft
aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu wrote:
Over on the scipy-user mailing list there was a question about
subclassing ndarray and I was interested to see two responses that
seemed to imply that subclassing should be avoided.
From Dag and Nathaniel,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I just realized that the pull request doesn't do what I thought it did which
is just add the flag to warn users who are writing to an array that is a
view when it used to be a copy. It's more cautious and also
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
+1
Don't forget that many user always update to each version. So they
will skip many version. This is especially true for people that rely
on the distribution package that skip many version when they update.
So this is
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Then are you suggesting that we need to back out the changes to the casting
rules as well, because this will also cause code to stop working. This is
part of my point. We are not being consistently cautious.
I
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
To be clear, I'm not opposed to the change, and it looks like we should go
forward.
In my mind it's not about developers vs. users as satisfying users is the
whole point. The purpose of NumPy is not to make its
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.gov wrote:
On 05/23/2012 05:31 PM, T J wrote:
It seems that there are a number of ways to check if an array is a view.
Do we have a preferred way in the API that is guaranteed to stay
available? Or are all of the various methods
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Larsen, Brian A balar...@lanl.gov wrote:
This is the stack overflow discussion mentioned.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9164269/can-you-tell-if-an-array-is-a-view-of-another
I basically implemented the answer from SO. I feel like the is gives you
a good
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing some strange behavior from .max() on a reshaped array in
the current master, and wanted to raise it here to make sure it's not
something uniquely broken in my setup.
This code fails for me, though changing
On May 25, 2012 2:21 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
(Hmm, now that I think about it, the edge cases are when the strides
are 0 or negative. 0-stride axes can simply be removed, and I think we
should be
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On May 25, 2012 2:21 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
(Hmm
Hi Fernando,
Excellent work!
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
In a similar spirit, Jonathan Taylor recently created one to call R
transparently in the notebook:
https://github.com/jonathan-taylor/Rmagic
This one hasn't been fully updated to the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Mark Bakker mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does isscalar('hello') return True?
I thought it would check for a number?
Numpy 1.6.1
Silly question?
Nope, but you're thinking of a different sense of scalar :-).
In numpy, scalar means something like anything
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
On 29 May 2012, at 15:00, Mark Bakker wrote:
Why does isscalar('hello') return True?
I thought it would check for a number?
No, it checks for something that is of 'scalar type', which probably can be
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/74b9f5eef8fac643bf9012dbb2ac6b4b19f46892
broke return_inverse for structured arrays, because of the use of
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Any reason why this:
import numpy
numpy.zeros(10)[-123]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
IndexError: index out of bounds
...could say this:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just ran into this:
np.__version__
'1.5.1'
np.empty((1,), dtype='h2') # works in 1.6.2 too
array([0], dtype=int16)
np.__version__
'1.7.0.dev-fd78546'
np.empty((1,), dtype='h2')
Traceback (most recent
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I could look into this. There are only ~10 places the code generates
this error, so it should be a pretty minor change.
My initial estimate
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
All of the failing tests seem to have been caused by the buffer copy bug,
fixed in https://github.com/mwiebe/numpy/tree/nditer_buffer_flag (but not
yet pulled into numpy).
I also have a version that implements tracing, with pure C
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if we implement the NEP listed above, but with a few
extensions. I think Numpy should handle the lazy evaluation part, and
determine when expressions should be evaluated, etc. However, for each
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/04/2012 09:06 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Mike Hansenmhan...@gmail.com wrote:
In trying to upgrade NumPy within Sage, we notices some differences in
behavior between 1.5
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy is approaching a time of
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be great if we implement the NEP listed above, but with a few
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Zachary Pincus zachary.pin...@yale.edu
wrote:
There is a fine line here. We do need to make people clean up lax code
in order to improve numpy, but hopefully we can keep the
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 14:58, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, John Salvatier
jsalv...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that If you try to increment elements of an array with advanced
indexing, repeated indexes don't get repeatedly incremented. For example:
In [30]: x = zeros(5)
In [31]: idx =
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Robert Cimrman cimrm...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote:
On 06/06/2012 05:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, John Salvatier
jsalv...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that If you try to increment elements of an array with advanced
Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/297
As per earlier discussion on the list, this PR attempts to remove
exactly and only the maskna-related code from numpy mainline:
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-May/062417.html
The
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bob Cowdery b...@bobcowdery.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am reading a datagram which contains within it a type. The type
dictates the structure of the datagram. I want to put this into a numpy
structure, one of which is:
[Manual PR notification]
-- Forwarded message --
From: timcera
Date: Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:13 PM
Subject: [numpy] ENH: Initial implementation of a 'neighbor' calculation (#303)
To: njsmith n...@pobox.com
Each element is assigned the result of a function based on it's neighbors.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
Hi all,
It has been some time, but I do have an update regarding this proposed
feature. I thought it would be helpful to flesh out some parts of a
possible implementation to learn what can be spelled reasonably in
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/13/2012 03:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I'm inclined to say therefore that we should just drop the open type
idea, since it adds complexity but doesn't seem to actually solve the
problem it's
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
On 6/13/12 8:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi Bryan,
I skimmed over the diff:
https://github.com/bryevdv/numpy/compare/master...enum
It was a bit hard to read since it seems like about half the changes
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Olivier Grisel
olivier.gri...@ensta.org wrote:
2012/6/14 James Bergstra bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Olivier Grisel
olivier.gri...@ensta.org wrote:
2012/6/13 James Bergstra bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca:
Further to the recent
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/297
As per earlier discussion on the list, this PR attempts to remove
exactly and only the maskna-related code from numpy mainline
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
https://github.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:53 PM, James Bergstra
bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Indeed that would be great as sympy already has already excellent math
expression rendering.
An alternative would be to output mathml
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
It is unfortunate that this was committed to master. This should be backed
out and is a blocker for 1.7. Can someone help me identify which commit
made the change?
This is a rather significant change and changes
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:22 PM, srean srean.l...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, I wrote a library routine for doing log-linear
regression. Doing this required computing the derivative of the
likelihood function, which was a huge nitpicky hassle; took me a few
hours to work out and debug. But
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that numpy.linalg.matrix_rank sometimes gives full rank for
matrices that are numerically rank deficient:
If I
Thanks to Marc Abramowitz[1], Numpy commits are now being tested by Travis-CI:
http://travis-ci.org/#!/numpy/numpy
As discussed on the numfocus list[2], this isn't really a complete CI
solution, because it only gives test coverage on 64-bit Ubuntu. But,
it does cover all supported versions of
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Brett
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
https://github.com
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the levels can only be strings. This is too limited for
my needs. Why not support all possible NumPy dtypes? In pandas world,
the levels can be any unique Index object
It seems like there are three obvious
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the levels can only be strings. This is too limited for
my
On Jun 17, 2012 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
On 6/13/12 1:12 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Yes, of course we *could* write the code to implement these open
dtypes, and then write the documentation, examples, tutorials, etc. to
help people work around
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:53 PM, John Salvatier
jsalv...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I want to support multiple types in the index_increment function that I've
written here:
https://github.com/jsalvatier/numpy/blob/master/numpy/core/src/multiarray/mapping.c
I need to check that the first
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I agree with what you're arguing for here (as little impact as possible on
existing users), but your view of especially 1.6.x seems to be skewed by
regressions and changes that were either unintended or thought to
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building
numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more
conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and
then linking those together. I gather from comments in the source code
that the former is the
According to the Travis-CI build logs, this code produces
non-deterministic behaviour in master:
a = np.arange(5)
a[:3] = a[2:]
assert_equal(a, [2, 3, 4, 3, 4])
Sometimes 'a' is [2, 3, 4, 3, 4], and sometimes it is [4, 3, 4, 3, 4].
The latter is what you get if the assignment is done
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building
numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38 AM, astronomer shailendra.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering if there any difference in memory overhead between the
following code.
a=numpy.arange(10)
b=numpy.arange(10)
c=a+b
and
a=numpy.arange(10)
b=numpy.arange(10)
c=numpy.empty_likes(a)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Pierre Haessig
On the other hand, just like srean mentionned, I think I also misused
the c[:] = a+b syntax.
I feel it's a bit confusing since this way of writing the assignment
really
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi Nathaniel,
Le 27/06/2012 20:22, Nathaniel Smith a écrit :
According to the Travis-CI build logs, this code produces
non-deterministic behaviour in master:
You mean non-deterministic across different builds
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Daniel Hyams dhy...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having trouble pickling (and then unpickling) an ndarray. Upon
unpickling, the base attribute of the ndarray is set to some very strange
string (base was None when the ndarray was pickled, so it should remain
None).
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have
-fvisibility=hidden? ...Is there even a list of compilers we support
available anywhere
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Sveinung Gundersen svein...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are developing a large project for genome analysis
(http://hyperbrowser.uio.no), where we use memmap vectors as the basic data
structure for storage. The stored data are accessed in slices, and used as
basis
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
In this email I propose a few changes which I think are minor
and which don't really affect the external NumPy API but which
I think could improve the import numpy performance by at
least 40%. This affects me because
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Sveinung Gundersen svein...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Your actual memory usage may not have increased as much as you think,
since memmap objects don't necessarily take much memory -- it sounds
like you're leaking virtual memory, but your resident set size
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I think this ship has sailed, but it'd be worth looking into lazy
importing
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I don't have any opinion on how acceptable this would be, but I also
don't see a benchmark showing how much this would help?
The profile output was lower
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
No, that's the wrong thing to test, because it effectively amounts to
'import numpy', sicne the numpy __init__ file is still executed. As
David indicated, you must
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sveinung Gundersen svein...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2. juli 2012, at 22.40, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Sveinung Gundersen svein...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Sveinung Gundersen svein...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2. juli 2012, at 22.40, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Chris Ball s0454...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
When calling tools/test-installed-numpy.py
(https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/tools/test-installed-numpy.py),
I can pass options to nose by supplying those options after --, eg:
$ python
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Chris Ball s0454...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Chris Ball s0454...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
When calling tools/test-installed-numpy.py
(https://github.com/numpy/numpy
[Apologies for cross-posting. Please direct any replies to
pyd...@googlegroups.com.]
I'm pleased to announce the first release of Patsy, a Python package
for describing statistical models and building design matrices using
formulas. Patsy's formulas are inspired by and largely compatible
with
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I've been bitten several times by this.
logical_or (a, b, c)
is silently accepted when I really meant
logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
because the logic
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been bitten several times by this.
logical_or (a, b, c)
is silently accepted when I really meant
logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Hey all,
We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
changes people are wanting to push into NumPy
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, jay bourque jay.bour...@continuum.io wrote:
Just added PR #359. The purpose is to allow the nditer object operand and
iter flags to be set for a ufunc to provide better control over how an array
is iterated over by a ufunc and how the ufunc uses the operands
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
there is a PR that I think could be merged before the relase:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/326
It is the addition of the inplace_increment function. It seam good,
but I can't review it enough as it use many
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Paul Natsuo Kishimoto
m...@paul.kishimoto.name wrote:
I've implemented this feature with skip_header=-1 as suggested by
Pierre, and in doing so removed the regression. TravisBot seems to like
it: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/351
Can we please not use
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, as `skip_header` is a number of lines, I don't really see anything
particular magical about a `skip_header=-1`.
The logic here is:
- if names=True, then genfromtext expects the names to be given in the
first line, and
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really have any deep issue with `skip_header=True`, besides not
really liking having an argument whose type can vary. But that's only a
matter of personal taste. And yes, we could always check the type…
I guess I
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
* 326 -- inplace increment function
-1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we shouldn't lock
ourselves into an ugly API when there's
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
Now things work and start compiling. Any ideas what is going on here?
Why is it trying to build the msvcr library?
I believe that it's actually trying to link to the msvcr library
(which requires first creating some
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
We are going to work on a beta release on the 1.7.x branch.The master is
open again for changes for 1.8.x. There will be some work on the 1.7.x
branch to fix bugs including bugs that are already
101 - 200 of 1301 matches
Mail list logo
