On 03/19/2014 08:45 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
mailto:n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at
On 03/20/2014 02:26 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 03/19/2014 08:45 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
mailto:n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k
On 09/23/2013 02:27 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Does numpy/scipy support building with openblas for blas,lapack instead of
atlas?
I have that working myself. I think it was simply a matter of using the
configuration below; NumPy will think it is ATLAS, but that doesn't matter.
Once NumPy is built
On 07/23/2013 09:35 AM, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
Alan G Isaac alan.isaac at gmail.com writes:
On 7/22/2013 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Having .T but not .H is an example of this split.
Hate to do this but ...
Readability counts.
+10!
A.conjugate().transpose() is unspeakably
On 07/23/2013 10:35 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 07/23/2013 09:35 AM, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
Alan G Isaac alan.isaac at gmail.com writes:
On 7/22/2013 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Having .T but not .H is an example of this split.
Hate to do this but ...
Readability counts
On 07/23/2013 07:53 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
I'm trying to understand the state of this discussion.
I believe that propoents of adding a .H attribute have
primarily emphasized
- readability (and general ease of use)
- consistency with matrix and masked array
- forward looking (to a future
On 06/25/2013 04:21 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't able to attend this year Scipy Conference. My tutorial proposal
was rejected and other deadline intefered with this conference date.
Will the presentation be recorded? If not, can you make the slide available?
What is your
On 06/17/2013 11:03 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 17.06.2013 17:11, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
Hi,
I saw that recently Julian Taylor is doing many low level optimization
like using SSE instruction. I think it is great.
Last year, Mark Florisson released the minivect[1] project that he
worked on
On 02/22/2013 05:52 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Matyáš Novák lo...@centrum.cz wrote:
You could also look into OpenBLAS, which is easier to build and
generally faster than ATLAS. (But alas, not supported by NumPy/SciPY AFAIK.)
It look slike OpenBLAS
On 02/20/2013 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljebotn at astro.uio.no writes:
On 02/18/2013 05:26 PM, rif wrote:
I have no answer to the question, but I was curious as to why directly
calling the cblas would be 10x-20x slower in the first place. That
seems surprising
On 02/18/2013 05:26 PM, rif wrote:
I have no answer to the question, but I was curious as to why directly
calling the cblas would be 10x-20x slower in the first place. That
seems surprising, although I'm just learning about python numerics.
The statement was that directly (on the Cython
On 02/18/2013 05:28 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 02/18/2013 05:26 PM, rif wrote:
I have no answer to the question, but I was curious as to why directly
calling the cblas would be 10x-20x slower in
The statement was that directly (on the Cython level) calling cblas is
10x-20x slower than
in this situation.
But if you have a code that is used with either many small or fewer
large matrices, then a compiled loop over a good BLAS is a good
compromise without splitting up the code paths.
DS
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
On 02/18/2013 06:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
18.02.2013 19:20, Dag Sverre Seljebotn kirjoitti:
On 02/18/2013 05:29 PM, rif wrote:
But I'd hope that the overhead for going through the wrappers is
constant, rather than dependent on the size, so that for large matrices
you'd get essentially
On 02/18/2013 09:23 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
18.02.2013 20:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn kirjoitti:
[clip]
I think there should be a new project, pylapack or similar, for this,
outside of NumPy and SciPy. NumPy and SciPy could try to import it, and
if found, fetch a function pointer table
On 02/10/2013 03:36 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there a way to add '-march=native' flag to gcc for the build?
I think something along these lines should work (untested):
CFLAGS=$(python-config --cflags) -march=native python setup.py install
Dag Sverre
On 02/10/2013 11:58 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 02/10/2013 03:36 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Is there a way to add '-march=native' flag to gcc for the build?
I think something along these lines should work (untested):
CFLAGS=$(python-config --cflags) -march=native python setup.py install
On 02/06/2013 08:41 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
if we decide to do so
I should mention that we don't really depend
On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/17/2013 01:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Matthieu Brucher
matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Actually, this behavior is already present in other languages, so I'm -1 on
additional verbosity.
Of course a += b is not the same as a = a + b. The
On 01/17/2013 05:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it really better to have `permute` and `permuted`
than to add a keyword? (Note that these are actually
still ambiguous, except by convention.)
The convention in
On 01/09/2013 11:49 AM, Mike Anderson wrote:
On 4 January 2013 16:00, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 01/04/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Anderson wrote:
Hello all,
In the Clojure community there has been some
On 01/09/2013 04:41 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
mailto:n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com
mailto:alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just a Python+NumPy user and not a
On 01/09/2013 06:22 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
This is a general issue applying to data which is read from real-world
external sources. For example, digitizers routinely represent their
samples as int8's or
On 01/08/2013 06:20 PM, Andrew Collette wrote:
Hi,
I think you are voting strongly for the current casting rules, because
they make it less obvious to the user that scalars are different from
arrays.
Maybe this is the source of my confusion... why should scalars be
different from arrays?
On 01/08/2013 10:32 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 01/08/2013 06:20 PM, Andrew Collette wrote:
Hi,
I think you are voting strongly for the current casting rules, because
they make it less obvious to the user that scalars are different from
arrays.
Maybe this is the source of my
On 2013-01-07 21:50, Andrew Collette wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Just to be clear, you mean you might have something like this?
def my_func('array_name', some_offset):
arr = load_somehow('array_name') # dtype hitherto unknown
return arr + some_offset
? And the problem is that it fails
On 01/06/2013 10:41 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 08:58 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 01/05/2013 10:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar - array
On 01/06/2013 11:16 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 6 Jan 2013 07:59, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Try to enumerate all the fundamentally different things (if you count
memory use/running time) that can happen for ndarrays a, b
On 01/06/2013 05:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I should have been more precise: I like the proposal, but also believe
the additional complexity introduced have significant costs that must be
considered
On 01/05/2013 10:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 5 Jan 2013 12:16, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following on from Nathaniel's explorations of the scalar - array
casting rules, some resources on rank-0 arrays.
The discussion that Nathaniel tracked down on rank-0 arrays;
On 01/04/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Anderson wrote:
Hello all,
In the Clojure community there has been some discussion about creating a
common matrix maths library / API. Currently there are a few different
fledgeling matrix libraries in Clojure, so it seemed like a worthwhile
effort to unify them
On 01/04/2013 09:00 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 01/04/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Anderson wrote:
Hello all,
In the Clojure community there has been some discussion about creating a
common matrix maths library / API. Currently there are a few different
fledgeling matrix libraries in Clojure
On 01/04/2013 02:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Reading the discussion on the scalar casting rule change I realized I
was hazy on the use-cases that led to the rule that scalars cast
differently from arrays.
On 01/04/2013 12:39 AM, Andrew Collette wrote:
Consensus in that bug report seems to be that for array/scalar operations
like:
np.array([1], dtype=np.int8) + 1000 # can't be represented as an int8!
we should raise an error, rather than either silently upcasting the
result (as in 1.6 and
On 12/22/2012 06:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Travis - I think you are suggesting that there should be no one
person in charge of numpy,
On 12/20/2012 03:23 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 12/20/12 9:53 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:03 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
The only scenario that I see that this would create unaligned arrays
is
for machines having AVX. But provided that the Intel architecture is
On 12/21/2012 02:30 PM, Happyman wrote:
I have everything in C or Fortran...According to my friends
recommendations I started learning Python for my research...
Do you mean the functions which gave Nan result has not been developed
properly yet in Python, Don't you
The way most of NumPy
On 12/20/2012 07:32 PM, Happyman wrote:
Hi Python users,
First of all, Marry coming Cristmas!!! ALL THE BEST TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY
I need solution of integration under trapz() rule:
There are following functions:
def F1 (const1, x):
several calculations depending on bessel
On 12/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 12/16/12 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hello all,
There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite
thin among the various projects that I take an interest in. In
particular, I am thrilled to publicly announce on this
On 12/18/2012 08:06 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 12/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 12/16/12 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hello all,
There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite
thin among the various projects that I take an interest
On 12/07/2012 07:58 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
One way of fixing this I'm sort of itching to do is to create a
pylapack project which can iterate quickly on these build issues,
run-time selection of LAPACK backend and so on. (With some templates
generating some Cython code it shouldn't
On 12/13/2012 07:59 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
One way of fixing this I'm sort of itching to do is to create a
pylapack project which can iterate quickly on these build issues,
run-time selection of LAPACK
On 12/06/2012 01:45 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Hi,
For those whom it may concern: Since the Numpy Trac - Github migration
is complete, I went ahead and added redirects
projects.scipy.org/numpy/register - github.com/numpy/numpy/issues
projects.scipy.org/numpy/newticket -
One way of fixing this I'm sort of itching to do is to create a
pylapack project which can iterate quickly on these build issues,
run-time selection of LAPACK backend and so on. (With some templates
generating some Cython code it shouldn't be more than a few days for an
MVP.)
Then patch NumPy
On 11/20/2012 06:22 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 20.11.2012 15:38, David Cournapeau wrote:
I support this as well in principle for our binary release: one issue
is that we don't have the infrastructure on mac to build an
On 11/20/2012 08:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/20/2012 06:22 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 20.11.2012 15:38, David Cournapeau wrote:
I support this as well in principle for our binary release: one issue
On 11/19/2012 06:12 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
I think NumPy and SciPy should consider to use OpenBLAS (a fork of
GotoBLAS2) instead of ATLAS or f2c'd Netlib BLAS for the binary releases.
Here are its virtues:
* Very easy to build: Just a makefile, no configuration script or
special build
On 11/09/2012 11:57 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
Hi,
A.A slower than A.A' is not a surprise for me. The latter is far more
cache friendly that the former. Everything follows cache lines, so it is
faster than something that will use one element from each cache line. In
fact it is exactly what
On 11/08/2012 01:07 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:28:21AM +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I think everyone would be very happy to see numpy.dot modified to do
this automatically. But adding a scipy.dot IMHO would be fixing things
in the wrong place and just create extra
On 11/07/2012 08:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Would you expect numexpr without MKL to give a significant boost?
If you need higher performance than what numexpr can give without using
MKL, you could look at code such as this:
https://github.com/herumi/fmath/blob/master/fmath.hpp#L480
But that
On 11/08/2012 06:06 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 11/8/12 1:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/07/2012 08:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Would you expect numexpr without MKL to give a significant boost?
If you need higher performance than what numexpr can give without using
MKL, you could
On 11/08/2012 06:59 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 11/8/12 6:38 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/08/2012 06:06 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 11/8/12 1:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/07/2012 08:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Would you expect numexpr without MKL to give a significant
On 11/08/2012 07:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/08/2012 06:59 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 11/8/12 6:38 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/08/2012 06:06 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On 11/8/12 1:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 11/07/2012 08:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Would you
On 11/07/2012 03:30 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
David Cournapeau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cournapeau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to do a bit of benchmarking to see if amd
On 10/24/2012 09:00 PM, Michael Aye wrote:
As numpy.fromfile seems to require full file object functionalities
like seek, I can not use it with the sys.stdin pipe.
So how could I stream a binary pipe directly into numpy?
I can imagine storing the data in a string and use StringIO but the
On 10/25/2012 08:17 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/24/2012 09:00 PM, Michael Aye wrote:
As numpy.fromfile seems to require full file object functionalities
like seek, I can not use it with the sys.stdin pipe.
So how could I stream a binary pipe directly into numpy?
I can imagine
On 10/17/2012 05:22 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/482
is a pull request that changes the hash function for numpy void
scalars. These are the objects returned from fully indexing a
structured array: array[i] if array is a 1-d structured array.
On 10/17/2012 06:56 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/17/2012 05:22 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/482
is a pull request that changes the hash function for numpy void
scalars. These are the objects returned from fully indexing a
structured
On 10/07/2012 08:41 AM, Jianbao Tao wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a Python wrapper of the NASA CDF C library in Cython. I
have got a working version of it now, but it is slower than the
counterpart in IDL. For loading the same file, mine takes about 400 ms,
whereas the IDL version takes about
On 10/07/2012 08:48 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 10/07/2012 08:41 AM, Jianbao Tao wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a Python wrapper of the NASA CDF C library in Cython. I
have got a working version of it now, but it is slower than the
counterpart in IDL. For loading the same file, mine takes
On 08/31/2012 09:03 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
There is segfault reported here:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1588
I've managed to isolate the problem and even provide a simple patch,
that fixes it here:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/398
however the patch simply
I just wanted to draw the attention of NumPy devs to Mark Florisson's
GSoC work.
It is 'minivect', a tool to use for compiling array expressions (think
(as a concept) a shared backend between Cython, Theano, numba, though
it's only used in Cython currently).
His M. Sc. thesis, Techniques for
On 08/14/2012 06:34 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
How should one use the vendor repository (https://github.com/numpy/vendor)
in Wine? Should I put the binaries into .wine/drive_c/Python25/libs/,
or somewhere else?
I've search all mailinglists and I didn't find any information on it.
I
On 08/04/2012 01:14 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
Hi David,
Apple's response here is somewhat confusing, but I will add that on the
supercomputing side of things we rarely fork, as this is not
well-supported from the vendors or the hardware (it's hard enough to
performantly spawn 500,000 processes
On 08/02/2012 10:44 PM, Damon McDougall wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about the licence for NumPy's codebase. I am currently
writing a library and I'd like to release under some BSD-type licence.
Unfortunately, my choice to link against MIT's FFTW library (released
under the GPL) means that,
On 07/15/2012 12:31 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
In https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/350/files ,
javius provides a patch to allow field extraction from a structured
array to return a view instead of a copy. Generally, this is consistent
with the desire to have NumPy return views whenever it
Some more context over what Francesc said:
If you mean using SSE for simple things like addition and multiplication, then
you must be aware that NumPy's way of working means that it lends itself very
badly to such optimizations. For small arrays, the Python interpreter overhead
tends to
+1 on scicomp.stackexchange.com
For it to work, one would need to actively push users towards it though...so it
would require a very clear pronouncement.
Matthew: I'm happy with the split we did with Cython. It leaves me free to
mostly ignore cython-users, and it saves users from thos 100+
On 06/30/2012 07:31 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I'm curious: do you mean using stackexchange.com itself, or using
http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/ specifically?
I meant the latter, which seems like it would be
On 06/30/2012 08:44 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
It is rumored that a problem with some stackexchange sites is the host
of nay-sayers saying that a question doesn't belong here but in this
other silo
On 06/30/2012 09:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:29 PM, John Hunterjdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jim Vickroyjim.vick...@noaa.gov wrote:
As a lurker and user, I too wish for a distinct numpy-users list. -- jv
This thread is a
On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think about the implications of our changes on existing users. and
also that little changes
On 06/26/2012 11:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 11
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 11
On 06/26/2012 04:08 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 06/26/2012 09:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Exactly.
I don't
feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
more strongly about datetime being included),
I think you left out a 'not'. I don't mean to imply that you were in
anyway the blame. And you have
On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
(I have not read the whole cython discussion yet)
So here's the summary. It's rather complicated but also incredibly neat
:-) And technical details can be hidden behind a tight API.
Could you provide a bit more context for this list. I
On 06/26/2012 10:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
(I have not read the whole cython discussion yet)
So here's the summary. It's rather complicated but also incredibly neat
:-) And technical details can be hidden behind a tight API.
Could you
On 06/23/2012 05:14 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
mailto:tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The usual practice is to announce a schedule first.
I just did announce the schedule.
What has been done in the past is that an
On 06/23/2012 09:32 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/23/2012 05:14 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Travis Oliphanttra...@continuum.io
mailto:tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The usual practice is to announce a schedule first.
I just did announce
On 06/18/2012 12:14 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
Based on some previous discussion on the numpy list [1] and in
now-cancelled PRs [2,3], I'd like to solicit opinions on adding an
interface for numpy memory allocation event tracking, as implemented
in this PR:
On 06/14/2012 12:06 AM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote:
On 6/13/12 1:12 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
your-branch's-base-master but not in your-repo's-master are new stuff
that you did on your branch. Solution is just to do
git pushyour github remote name master
Fixed, thanks.
Yes, of course we
On 06/13/2012 03:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Bryan Van de Venbry...@continuum.io
wrote:
Hi all,
It has been some time, but I do have an update regarding this proposed
feature. I thought it would be helpful to flesh out some parts of a
possible
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/13/2012 03:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I'm inclined to say therefore that we should just drop the open
type
idea, since it adds complexity but doesn't seem
On 06/06/2012 12:06 AM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 22:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/05/2012 10:47 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
On 06/05/2012 10:47 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 5 June 2012 20:17, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2012 17:38, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark florisson
On 05/18/2012 01:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 17 May 2012 23:53, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I'm repeating myself a bit, but my previous thread of this ended up
being about something else, and also since then I've been on an
expedition to the hostile waters of
On 05/25/2012 03:17 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kernrobert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
(Hmm, now that I think about it, the edge cases are when the strides
are 0 or negative. 0-stride axes can simply be removed, and I think we
should be able to work back to a
On 05/23/2012 07:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com mailto:n...@pobox.com
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
tra...@continuum.io mailto:tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I just
On 05/23/2012 10:00 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/23/2012 07:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.commailto:n...@pobox.com
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
tra
On 05/22/2012 12:06 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
So starting in Python 2.7 and 3.2, the Python developers have made
DeprecationWarnings invisible by default:
http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.7.html#the-future-for-python-2-x
On 05/22/2012 04:25 PM, Massimo DiPierro wrote:
hello everybody,
first of all thanks to the developed for bumpy which is very useful. I am
building a software that uses numpy+pyopencl for lattice qcd computations.
One problem that I am facing is that I need to perform most operations on
On 05/22/2012 04:54 PM, Massimo DiPierro wrote:
For now I will be doing this:
import numpy
import time
a=numpy.zeros(200)
b=numpy.zeros(200)
c=1.0
# naive solution
t0 = time.time()
for i in xrange(len(a)):
a[i] += c*b[i]
print time.time()-t0
# possible solution
Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
After reading all the discussion around masked arrays and getting input
from as many people as possible, it is clear that there is still
disagreement about what to do, but there have been some fruitful
discussions that ensued.
This isn't
Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I'm repeating myself a bit, but my previous thread of this ended up
being about something else, and also since then I've been on an
expedition to the hostile waters of python-dev.
I'm crazy enough to believe that I'm proposing
Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 12:48 +0100, mark florisson wrote:
If we can find even more examples, preferably outside of the
scientific community, where related projects face a similar
situation,
it may help people understand that this is not a Numpy problem.
I'm repeating myself a bit, but my previous thread of this ended up
being about something else, and also since then I've been on an
expedition to the hostile waters of python-dev.
I'm crazy enough to believe that I'm proposing a technical solution to
alleviate the problems we've faced as a
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
