Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?

and revamping of the site, which can happen once we have a larger percentage of the docstrings in draft form. (Any discussion on the merits of this should take place on scipy-dev, which is the home of doc discussions.) --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Academic citation ?

domains, except for docs.scipy.org, are completely absent; you have to know about them to find them. I don't even know where to find a complete list of these. They should all have a presence on at least the front page and maybe the navigation. --jh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numexpr 1.1, an efficient array evaluator

is a benchmark example against numpy. Make it simple, so that people can copy and modify the benchmark code to test their own performance improvements. I added an entry for it on the Topical Software list. Please check it out and modify as you see fit --jh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numexpr 1.1, an efficient array evaluator

and most users will only do this once, if ever) ** Implementation Notes (rest of current How It Works section) ** Credits --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] coding style: citations

journals use it (Abt 1985). --jh-- Abt, H. 1985. Harold Abt used to publish surveys of things like citations when he was ApJ editor in the 1980s but I'm making this one up just to demonstrate the format except he'd never allow an article title in a citation because he wanted to save ink which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] coding style: citations

Well, best to have the full functionality. These things are intended to be both book components and stand-alone pages. Citation formats are a religious war anyway. --jh-- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:41:17 -0500 From: Alan G Isaac ais...@american.edu Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] coding style

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about the documentation of linalg.solve

-trivial example will provide material for other writers to flesh out a full doc for the routine. Thanks everyone for your help! --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--

I hope you'll grab the updated docstrings before tagging. At least grab numpy.__doc__. The main numpy help string didn't adequately point users to alternatives to help() for the ufuncs. --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Medians that ignore values

this common task much easier in that language than ours. --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion