Hi,
I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
C-api? That way, people will be able to detect if there is change in
the c-api of NA when
2012/4/24 Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org
Hi,
I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
C-api? That way, people will be able to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Should be 6 in 1.6
# Binary compatibility version number. This number is increased whenever the
# C-API is changed such that binary compatibility is broken, i.e. whenever a
# recompile of extension modules is
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Paul Hobson pmhob...@gmail.com wrote:
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long
Thank you very much for contributing this description.It is very helpful to
see how people use numpy.ma in the wild.
-Travis
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long time and
never got around to it. The main thing I'd like to is convey my
typical use of
On 04/09/2012 06:52 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
I've been waiting for Mark Wiebe to arrive in Austin where he will
spend several weeks, but I also know that masked arrays will be only
one of the things he and I are hoping to make head-way on while he is
in Austin.Nevertheless, we
10.04.2012 06:52, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
4) I'm still not sure about whether the IGNORED
concept is necessary or not. I really like the separation
that was emphasized between implementation (masks versus
bit-patterns) and operations (propagating versus non-propagating).
Pauli
Hey all,
I've been waiting for Mark Wiebe to arrive in Austin where he will spend
several weeks, but I also know that masked arrays will be only one of the
things he and I are hoping to make head-way on while he is in Austin.
Nevertheless, we need to make progress on the masked array
