[Numpy-discussion] Python 2.6 and numpy 1.3.0/1.4.0 from an extension

2010-02-08 Thread Peter Notebaert
I have made an extension that also uses numpy. I developed with Python 2.6 and numpy 1.4.0 This works all fine. The problem is that users that use this extension get crahes from the moment they use the extension and this because of numpy. It crashes when numpy is initialised. This because those

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 2.6 and numpy 1.3.0/1.4.0 from an extension

2010-02-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Peter Notebaert p...@telenet.be wrote: I have made an extension that also uses numpy. I developed with Python 2.6 and numpy 1.4.0 This works all fine. The problem is that users that use this extension get crahes from the moment they use the extension and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 2.6 and numpy 1.3.0/1.4.0 from an extension

2010-02-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Peter Notebaert p...@telenet.be wrote: I have made an extension that also uses numpy. I developed with Python 2.6 and numpy 1.4.0 This works all fine. The problem is that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 2.6 and numpy 1.3.0/1.4.0 from an extension

2010-02-08 Thread Alan G Isaac
I see that NumPy 1.4.0 is still the download offered on SourceForge. Did I misunderstand that a decision had been made to withdraw it, at least until the ongoing discussion about ABI breakage is resolved? (Btw, as a user, I'm hoping Jarrod's sensible proposal prevails in that discussion. That

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 2.6 and numpy 1.3.0/1.4.0 from an extension

2010-02-08 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Alan G Isaac ais...@american.edu wrote: I see that NumPy 1.4.0 is still the download offered on SourceForge.  Did I misunderstand that a decision had been made to withdraw it, at least until the ongoing discussion about ABI breakage is resolved? I went ahead