Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-08 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: Wow -- took a little while, but presto! A pile of wheels, ready to go: $ ls wheelhouse/ Jinja2-2.7.1-py27-none-any.whl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-08 Thread Chris Barker
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: I'm under the impression that $ pip install --use-wheel --no-index --find-links=/local_download_dir ipython and $ pip install --use-wheel --no-index --find-links=hosting_url ipython should both work. Cool

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: One of the things that we should start doing for numpy is distribute releases as wheels. On OS X at least this is quite simple, so I propose to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-07 Thread Chris Barker
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Wow -- took a little while, but presto! A pile of wheels, ready to go: $ ls wheelhouse/ Jinja2-2.7.1-py27-none-any.whl pyzmq-14.0.1-cp27-none-macosx_10_6_intel.whl MarkupSafe-0.18-cp27-none-macosx_10_6_intel.whl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-07 Thread Chris Barker
Temporarily you can put them on SourceForge or on any public download site. Then people can download and install with wheel. If you send me a link to those files, then I'll put them up together with the numpy wheels on SF. Thanks -- I'll try to do that later today.-- Done:

[Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, There are a few discussions on packaging for the scientific Python stack ongoing, on the NumFOCUS and distutils lists: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/numfocus/mVNakFqfpZg https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/numfocus/HUcwXTM_jNY

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Julian Taylor
On 06.12.2013 19:06, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi all, There are a few discussions on packaging for the scientific Python stack ongoing, on the NumFOCUS and distutils lists: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/numfocus/mVNakFqfpZg https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/numfocus/HUcwXTM_jNY

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Oscar Benjamin
On 6 December 2013 20:09, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: 2. in the absence of statistics, can we do an experiment by putting one wheel up on PyPi which contains SSE3 instructions, for python 3.3 I propose, and seeing for how many (if any) users this goes wrong? sounds good -- it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Oscar Benjamin oscar.j.benja...@gmail.comwrote: On 6 December 2013 20:09, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: 2. in the absence of statistics, can we do an experiment by putting one wheel up on PyPi which contains SSE3 instructions, for python 3.3 I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 12/6/2013 10:06 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi all, There are a few discussions on packaging for the scientific Python stack ongoing, on the NumFOCUS and distutils lists: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/numfocus/mVNakFqfpZg

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 12/6/2013 10:06 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi all, There are a few discussions on packaging for the scientific Python stack ongoing, on the NumFOCUS and distutils lists:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 12/6/2013 12:40 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 12/6/2013 10:06 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi all, There are a few discussions on packaging for the scientific Python stack

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 12/6/2013 12:40 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: Has anyone succeeded building wheels for numpy, scipy, and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Oscar Benjamin oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 December 2013 20:09, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: 2. in the absence of statistics, can we do an experiment by

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing wheels SSE/superpack options

2013-12-06 Thread Chris Barker
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: One of the things that we should start doing for numpy is distribute releases as wheels. On OS X at least this is quite simple, so I propose to just experiment with it. OK -- maybe on the wrong list, but an itch of