On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I already gave my own opinion on py3k, which can be summarized as:
- it is a huge effort, and no core numpy/scipy developer has
expressed
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 07:15, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Another topic concerning documentation is API compatibility. The
python devs have requested projects not use the 2-3 transition as an
excuse to change their APIs, but numpy is maybe a special case. I'm
thinking about PEP3118.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I already gave my own opinion on py3k, which can be summarized
Darren Dale wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I already gave my own opinion on py3k, which can be summarized as:
- it is a huge effort, and no core numpy/scipy
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Charles R
Harrischarlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Darren Dale wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I already gave my own opinion on py3k, which can be summarized as:
- it is a huge effort,
Robert Kern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 07:15, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
We aren't supposed to break APIs that aren't related to the 2-3
transition. PEP3118 is related to the 2-3 transition. Since I'm that
somebody that always pipes up about this topic, I'm pretty sure it
hasn't
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:40, Christopher Barkerchris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 07:15, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
We aren't supposed to break APIs that aren't related to the 2-3
transition. PEP3118 is related to the 2-3 transition. Since I'm
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python Software Foundation about support to help get numpy working
with python-3?
Thanks,
Darren
___
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:56 PM, David Warde-Farleyd...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
Hey Darren,
On 8-Sep-09, at 3:21 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python
Hey Darren,
On 8-Sep-09, at 3:21 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python Software Foundation about support to help get numpy working
with python-3?
It's a great
Darren Dale wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python Software Foundation about support to help get numpy working
with python-3?
What kind of support are you talking about?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Darren Dale wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python Software Foundation about support to help get numpy
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:08 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I already gave my own opinion on py3k, which can be summarized as:
- it is a huge effort, and no core numpy/scipy developer has
expressed the urge to transition to py3k, since py3k does not bring
much for
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
- it remains to be seen whether we can do the py3k support in the
same source tree as the one use for python = 2.4. Having two source
trees would make the effort even much bigger, well over the current
developers
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Darren Daledsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a core numpy developer and don't want to step on anybody's
toes here. But I was wondering if anyone had considered approaching
the Python Software Foundation about support to help get numpy working
with python-3?
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
