On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington jking...@wisc.edu wrote:
Is there a numpy function for testing floating point equality that returns
a boolean array?
I'm aware of np.allclose, but I need a boolean array. Properly handling
NaN's and Inf's (as allclose does) would be a nice bonus.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington jking...@wisc.edu wrote:
Is there a numpy function for testing floating point equality that returns
a boolean array?
I'm aware of np.allclose, but I need a boolean
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington jking...@wisc.edu wrote:
Is there a numpy function for testing floating point equality
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:22, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:34, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Because this is also bad:
np.TAB
Display all 561 possibilities? (y or n)
Not as bad as overloading np.allclose(x,y,return_array=True). Or
Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:34, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Because this is also bad:
np.TAB
Display all 561 possibilities? (y or
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:51, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:34, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 11:03, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:51, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:34, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3,
Hi,
I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around numpy's C API
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 16:06, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 11:03, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:51, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 11:03, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:51, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:22, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
Le 3 mars 2012 13:07, Joe Kington jking...@wisc.edu a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 15:22, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar
Hi all,
I've been thinking a lot about the masked array implementation lately. I
finally had the time to look hard at what has been done and now am of the
opinion that I do not think that 1.7 can be released with the current state of
the masked array implementation *unless* it is clearly
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hi all,
I've been thinking a lot about the masked array implementation lately.
I finally had the time to look hard at what has been done and now am of the
opinion that I do not think that 1.7 can be released with the
Mind, Mark only had a few weeks to write code. I think the unfinished state
is a direct function of that.
I have heard from several users that they will *not use the missing data* in
NumPy as currently implemented, and I can now see why.For better or for
worse, my approach to
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Would it be helpful if I went ahead and submitted a pull request with the
function in my original question called isclose (along with a complete
docstring and a few tests)?
One note:
At the moment, it deliberately
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Luis Pedro Coelho l...@cmu.edu wrote:
Hi,
I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around
20 matches
Mail list logo
