All,
I’ve been fairly quiet on the various missing/masked values proposals,
sorry about that. I figured I would take the opportunity of Travis O.’s
deadline of Wed. 16th to put some aspects of numpy.ma in a semi-historical,
semi-personal perspective. Apologies in advance if I misrepresent some
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the
flag for people that want to use it.
Why?
1) There is probably 10k script that use it that will need to be
checked for correctness. There
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
So, the behavior is actually quite predictable, it's just that in some common
cases it doesn't do what you would expect --- especially if you think that
[0,1] is the same as :2. When I wrote this code to begin with
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the
flag for people that want to use it.
Why?
1) There is
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just as a sanity check, do the scipy tests run without producing any such
messages?
I tried checking this before, actually, but can't figure out how to
Hi,
I am getting into troubles when using numpy.testing with coverage. A
minimal example package is atached to this email. Unpack and run:
$ python -c import mypackage; mypackage.test(verbose=10,coverage=False)
$ python -c import mypackage; mypackage.test(verbose=10,coverage=True)
Some
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just as a sanity check, do the scipy tests run without producing any such
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I built some pristine python 2.7 installs from scratch (no virtualenv,
no distro tweaks, etc.). Then I installed some version of numpy in
each, then tried building scipy. With numpy 1.6.1 (built from git),
everything seems
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I built some pristine python 2.7 installs from scratch (no virtualenv,
no distro tweaks, etc.). Then I installed some version of numpy in
each, then
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I built some pristine python 2.7 installs from scratch (no virtualenv,
no
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Fabrice Silva si...@lma.cnrs-mrs.fr wrote:
Hi,
I am getting into troubles when using numpy.testing with coverage. A
minimal example package is atached to this email. Unpack and run:
$ python -c import mypackage; mypackage.test(verbose=10,coverage=False)
$
maybe it's this
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/49785/focus=49787
Thanks for your reply, Not sure it is the same trouble, I'll have a
deeper look at that thread...
It helped in my case, and I don't have a problem running the tests
with your mypackage (using my
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this
week,
that would be great.
If there's a patch by this weekend I can create a second RC, so we can
still have the final release before
I recently had need of tracing numpy data allocation/deallocation. I
was unable to find a simple way to do so, and so ended up putting the
code below into ndarraytypes.h to allow me to trace allocations. A
key part is that this jumps back into python, so I can inspect the
stack and find out
On 05/16/2012 09:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com mailto:jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this
week,
that would be great.
If
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the
flag for people that want to use it.
Why?
1) There is
On May 13, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Another approach would be to introduce a method:
a.diag(copy=False)
and leave a.diagonal() alone. Then, a.diagonal() could be deprecated over
2-3 releases.
Hello,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this
week,
that would be great.
If there's a
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Sandro Tosi matrixh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, if there's anyone wants to
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/16/2012 09:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com mailto:jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi, if there's anyone
This Pull Request looks like a good idea to me as well.
-Travis
On May 16, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Fabrice Silva si...@lma.cnrs-mrs.frwrote:
maybe it's this
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/49785/focus=49787
Thanks for your reply, Not sure it is the same trouble, I'll have a
deeper look at that thread...
Both coverage=True and
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I tried checking this before, actually, but can't figure out how to
build scipy against a copy of numpy that is installed in either a
virtualenv or just on PYTHONPATH. (Basically, I just don't want to
install some random
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I
have lying around my homedir that it would generally be a free speed
win
Don't forget the case where the copy semantics may actually provide an
*improvement* in performance by allowing a potentially large array to
get
28 matches
Mail list logo
