[Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

Hi all, The server for the scipy.org mailing list is in very bad shape, so we (led by Didrik Pinte) are planning to complete the migration of active mailing lists to the python.org infrastructure and to decommission the lists than seem dormant/obsolete. The scipy-user mailing list was already

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > >> Has anyone taken care of notifying gmane about this? >> > > We will have to update this info in quite a few places after the move is > done. Including Gmane, although that site hasn't been

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > Are you sure about astropy? They recently moved to google groups. https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/astropy/ shows messages as recent as today. So I'm sure I think (but happy to be corrected if moving to python.org

[Numpy-discussion] Release tags

I am searching for the exact git hash corresponding to numpy 1.12.1 Looking at the result of `git tag -l` yielded tags for v1.11.0, but nothing higher. Also the documentation site https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/release.html does not seem to list 1.12.1, but I guess that is a separate

[Numpy-discussion] Structured array creation with list of lists and others

It was the first time I tried to create a structured array in numpy. Usually I use pandas for heterogeneous arrays, but it is one more dependency to my project. It took me some time (really, much more than some), to understand the problem with structured array creation. As example: I had list of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release tags

probably the git quirk of not pulling tags by default, you need to run: git pull --tags On 23.03.2017 19:10, Matti Picus wrote: > I am searching for the exact git hash corresponding to numpy 1.12.1 > > Looking at the result of `git tag -l` yielded tags for v1.11.0, but > nothing higher. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

The switchover happened on almost the same day, see: https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/astropy/2017-March/004498.html On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:09 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Nathan Goldbaum > wrote: > > Are you sure

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PyData Barcelona this May

Thanks for the suggestion! That abstract is limited to 400 characters, and it's already at 350+, so there isn't much room left. If it gets accepted I will eventually need to fill out an extended abstract, where I will make sure to explain that better. Jaime On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:45 PM,