On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Intel, gcc:
4, -2147483648
PPC, gcc:
4, 2147483647
I think that's what you predicted. Is it strange that the same
compiler gives
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for my continued confusion here. This is numpy 1.6.1 on windows
XP 32 bit.
In [2]: np.finfo(np.float96).nmant
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the availability of SciPy 0.10.0. For this
release over a 100 tickets and pull requests have been closed, and many new
features have been added. Some of the highlights are:
-
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:21 AM
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this expected behavior?
np.array([-345,4,2,'ABC'])
array(['-34', '4', '2', 'ABC'], dtype='|S3')
Given that strings should be the result, this looks like a bug. It's a bit
of a corner case that probably slipped
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 17:39, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that strings should be the result, this looks like a bug. It's a
bit
of a corner case that probably slipped through during
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Travis Oliphant teoliph...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
There have been some wonderfully vigorous discussions over the past few
months that have made it clear that we need some clarity about how
decisions will be made in the NumPy community.
When we were a
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/4/2011 1:43 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I don't think there are 5 active developers, let alone 11.
With hard work you might scrape together two or three.
Having 5 or 11 people making decisions for the two
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to add a fixed precision rational number dtype to numpy,
and am running into an issue trying to register ufunc loops. The code
in question looks like
int npy_rational =
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
When attempting to cast to a user defined type, PyArray_GetCast looks
up the cast function in the dictionary but doesn't check if the entry
exists. This causes segfaults. Here's a patch.
Geoffrey
diff --git
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm guessing
this code doesn't get a lot of testing. Glad it's there, though!
Geoffrey
diff --git a/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
When attempting to cast to a user defined type
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm
Hi Geoffrey,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Travis Oliphant teoliph...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
There have been some wonderfully vigorous discussions over the
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi all,
It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy amount of bug
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
2011/12/5 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
As for barriers to entry, improving the the nature of discourse on the
mailing
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Gregor Thalhammer
gregor.thalham...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 12.12.2011 um 15:04 schrieb LASAGNA DAVIDE:
Hi,
I have written a class for polynomials with negative
exponents like:
p(x) = a0 + a1*x**-1 + ... + an*x**-n
The code is this one:
class
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, McNicol, Adam amcni...@longroad.ac.ukwrote:
**
Hi There,
I am very new to numpy and have really only started investigating it as
one of my students needs some functionality from matplotlib. I have managed
to install everything under Windows for work in
Hi Ralf,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi all,
It's been a little over 6 months since the release of 1.6.0 and the NA
debate has quieted down, so I'd like to ask your opinion on the timing of
1.7.0. It looks to me like we have a healthy
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jack Bryan dtustud...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have set up PYTHONPATH :
sys.path
['', '/mypath/numpy/lib/python2.7/site-packages', '/
mypath/python272/lib/python27.zip',
'/ mypath/python272/lib/python2.7', '/
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
As a followup to the prior thread on bugs in user defined types in
numpy, I converted my rational number class from C++ to C and switched
to 32 bits to remove the need for unportable 128 bit numbers. It
should be
Hi Geoffrey,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
As a followup to the prior thread on bugs in user defined types in
numpy, I converted my rational number class from C++ to C and switched
to 32 bits to remove the need for unportable 128 bit numbers.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Geoffrey,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Geoffrey Irving irv...@naml.us wrote:
Hello,
As a followup to the prior thread
Hi All,
The following change breaks existing code, my polynomial classes for
example.
File: numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_object.c
Previous Code:
/*
* FAIL with NotImplemented if the other object has
* the __rop__ method and has __array_priority__ as
* an attribute (signalling
Hi All,
I thought I'd raise this topic just to get some ideas out there. At the
moment I see two areas that I'd like to see addressed.
1. Documentation editor. This would involve looking at the generated
documentation and it's organization/coverage as well such things as style
and
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I thought I'd raise this topic just to get some ideas out there. At the
moment I see two areas that I'd like to see
Hi All,
I've made a pull request for a rather large update of the polynomial
package. The new features are
1) Bug fixes
2) Improved documentation in the numpy reference
3) Preliminary support for multi-dimensional coefficient arrays
4) Support for NA in the fitting routines
5) Improved testing
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:46 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've made a pull request for a rather large update of the polynomial
package. The new features are
1) Bug fixes
2) Improved
This sort of makes sense, but is it the 'correct' behavior?
In [20]: zeros(2, 'S')
Out[20]:
array(['', ''],
dtype='|S1')
It might be more consistent to return '0' instead, as in
In [3]: zeros(2, int).astype('S')
Out[3]:
array(['0', '0'],
dtype='|S24')
Chuck
I've put up a pull request for a fix to ticket #1973. Currently the fix
simply propagates the maskna flag when the *.astype method is called. A
more complicated option would be to add a maskna keyword to specify whether
the output is masked or not or propagates the type of the source, but that
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I thought I'd raise this topic just to get some ideas out there. At the
moment I see two areas that I'd like to see
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:21 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 01/14/2012 04:31 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I've put up a pull request for a fix to ticket #1973. Currently the fix
simply propagates the maskna flag when the *.astype method is called. A
more complicated option
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 01/14/2012 04:31 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I've put up a pull request for a fix to ticket #1973. Currently the fix
simply
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 01/14/2012 04:31 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I've put up a pull request for a fix to ticket #1973. Currently the fix
simply propagates the maskna flag when the *.astype method is called. A
more complicated option
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Nathan Faggian nathan.fagg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am finding it less than useful to have the negative index wrapping on
nd-arrays. Here is a short example:
import numpy as np
a = np.zeros((3, 3))
a[:,2] = 1000
print a[0,-1]
print a[0,-1]
print
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Adam Klein a...@lambdafoundry.com wrote:
Hello,
I get a segfault here:
In [1]: x = np.array([1,2,3], dtype='M')
In [2]: x.searchsorted(2, side='left')
But it's fine here:
In [1]: x = np.array([1,2,3], dtype='M')
In [2]: x.view('i8').searchsorted(2,
Hi All,
I'd like some feedback on how mask NA should interact with views. The
immediate problem is how to deal with the real and imaginary parts of
complex numbers. If the original has a masked value, it should show up as
masked in the real and imaginary parts. But what should happen on
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kathleen M Tacina
kathleen.m.tac...@nasa.gov wrote:
**
I found something similar, with a very simple example.
On 64-bit linux, python 2.7.2, numpy development version:
In [22]: a = 4000*np.ones((1024,1024),dtype=np.float32)
In [23]: a.mean()
Out[23]:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:30 PM, David Warde-Farley
warde...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:02:44PM -0500, David Warde-Farley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Robin wrote:
Yes - I get exactly the same numbers in 64 bit windows with 1.6.1.
Alright,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:15 AM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Short demonstration of the issue:
In []: sys.version
Out[]: '2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
In []: np.version.version
Out[]: '1.6.0'
In []: from numpy.polynomial import
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Andreas Kloeckner
li...@informa.tiker.netwrote:
Hi all,
here's something I don't understand. Consider the following code snippet:
---
class A(object):
def __radd__(self, other):
print(type(other))
Hi All,
Two things here.
1) Some macros for threading and the iterator now require a trailing
semicolon. This change will be reverted before the 1.7 release so that
scipy 0.10 will compile, but because it is desirable in the long term it
would be helpful if folks maintaining c extensions using
The macro PyArray_RemoveLargest has been replaced by PyArray_RemoveSmallest
(which seems strange), but I wonder if this documentation still makes sense.
diff --git a/doc/source/user/c-info.beyond-basics.rst b/doc/source/user/
c-info.beyond-basics.rs
index 9ed2ab3..3437985 100644
---
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/01/2012 02:53 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
Two things here.
1) Some macros for threading and the iterator now require a trailing
semicolon. This change will be reverted before the 1.7 release so
Hi All,
In the discussion on deprecating old macros in 1.7 as part of pull request
189 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/189 the issue of how to move
numpy forward and start clearing the decks of accumulated cruft arose. The
proposal here is to make the 1.7 a long term support release that we
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
We are spending a lot of time on NumPy and will be for the next few
months. I think that 1.8 will be a better long term release. We need a
few more fundamental features yet.
Look for a roadmap document for
2012/2/6 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
Hi all,
I noticed the following docstring on ``np.polynomial.polyval``:
In [116]: np.polynomial.polyval?
File: /home/stefan/src/numpy/numpy/lib/utils.py
Definition: np.polynomial.polyval(*args, **kwds)
Docstring:
`polyval` is
Hi All,
Does anyone know how to make Cython emit a C macro? I would like to be able
to
#define NO_DEPRECATED_API
and can do so by including a header file or futzing with the generator
script, but I was wondering if there was an easy way to do it in Cython.
Chuck
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Drew Frank drewfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Firing efiring at hawaii.edu writes:
On 02/08/2012 09:31 PM, teomat wrote:
Hi,
Am I wrong or the numpy.arange() function is not correct 100%?
Try to do this:
In [7]: len(np.arange(3.1, 4.9,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I propose to give Francesc Alted commit rights to the NumPy project.
Francesc will be working full time on NumPy for several months and it will
enable him to participate in pull requests.
Francesc Alted has been very
Hi Dag,
This probably needs to be on the cython mailing list at some point, but I
thought I'd start the discussion here. Numpy is going to begin deprecating
direct access to ndarray/dtype internals, ala arr-data etc. There are
currently macros/functions for many of these operations in the numpy
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
This is good feedback.
It looks like there are 2 concerns:
1) no way to add attachments --- it would seem that gists and indeed other
github repos solves that problem.
2) You must be an admin to label an issue (i.e.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.comwrote:
On 11 February 2012 21:45, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11 February 2012 20:31, Charles R Harris charlesr.har
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
my apologies for my deep ignorance about math stuff; I guess I
should be able to find this out but I keep getting impossible results.
Basically I have a set of x, y data (around 1,000 elements each) and
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.comwrote:
Jonathan,
On 12 February 2012 20:53, Jonathan Hilmer wrote:
Andrea,
Here is how to do it with splines. I would be more standard to return
an array of normals, rather than two arrays of x and y components, but
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.comwrote:
Charles,
On 12 February 2012 21:00, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
my apologies for my deep ignorance about math stuff
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I disagree with your assessment of the subscript operator, but I'm sure we
will have plenty of time to discuss that. I don't think it's correct to
compare the corner cases of the fancy indexing and regular indexing to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
No argument on any of this. It's just that this needs to happen at
NumPy 2.0, not in the NumPy 1.X series. I think requiring a re-compile is
far-less onerous than changing the type-coercion subtly in a 1.5 to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
No argument on any of this. It's just that this needs to happen at
NumPy 2.0, not in the NumPy 1.X series. I think requiring a re-compile is
far-less onerous than changing the type-coercion subtly in a 1.5 to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The lack of commutativity wasn't in precision, it was in the typecodes,
and was there from the beginning. That caused confusion. A current cause of
confusion is the many to one relation of, say, int32 and long,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Gordon L. Kindlmann g...@uchicago.eduwrote:
Hello,
This (below) caught my eye and I'm wondering what further information is
available?
I very much value the ability to wrap underlying array data from numpy for
processing in non-python libraries, as well as
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just a thought I had. Right now, I can pass a list of python ints or
floats into np.array() and get a numpy array with a sensible dtype. Is
there any reason why we can't do the same for python's datetime? Right
now, it
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi Travis,
It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Alan G Isaac
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:30 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@enthought.com wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
16.02.2012 18:00, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
[clip]
I agree, but the behavior is still surprising -- people reasonably
expect something like svd to be deterministic. So there's probably a
doc bug for alerting people
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
If non-contributing users came along on the Cython list demanding that
we set up a system to select non-developers along on a board
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Travis Vaught tra...@vaught.net wrote:
On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Travis's proposal is that we go from a large number of self-selecting
people putting in
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Travis Vaught tra
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@enthought.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Spotz, William F wfsp...@sandia.govwrote:
I have a user who is reporting tests that are failing on his platform.
I have not been able to reproduce the error on my system, but working with
him, we have isolated the problem to unexpected results when
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Travis,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well as talking
with Charles) a good way forward to balance two competing
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu
wrote:
On 02/17/2012 05:39 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 02/17/2012 05:39 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau
courn...@gmail.com
mailto:courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Travis,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Travis Oliphant
tra...@continuum.io mailto:tra
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Bill Spotz wfsp...@sandia.gov wrote:
Chuck,
I provided a little more context in another email. The user is using
numpy 1.6.1 with python 2.6. I asked him to try an earlier version --
we'll see how it goes. This is code that has worked for a long time. It
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over c for high
performance libraries. I am not convinced by the number of people argument
either: it is not my experience that c++ is easier to maintain in a open
source
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 01:58 skrev Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over c for high
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
For what it's worth, Cython supports C++ now. I'm sure there are people
on this list that know much better than me the extent of this support,
so I will let them chime in, but here are some docs on it:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 03:53, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 03:53, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Why would you even see an exception if it is caught before it escapes? I
would expect the C API to behave just as it currently does. What am I
missing?
Structured exception handling in the OS.
MSVC uses SEH for
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:00 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 04:37, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 03:53, Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 05:56 skrev Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
But won't a C++ wrapper catch that?
A try-catch block with MSVC will register an SEH with the operating
system. GCC (g++) implements
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Charles R
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:24 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we already have code obfuscation (DOUBLE_your_pleasure,
FLOAT_your_boat), so we might as well let the compiler handle
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I'm reading very carefully any arguments against using C++ because I've
actually pushed back on Mark pretty hard as we've discussed these things
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The decision will not be made until NumPy 2.0 work is farther along.
The most likely outcome is that Mark will develop something quite nice in
C++ which he is already toying with, and we will either choose to use it in
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fedora linux I use ccache, which is completely transparant and makes
a huge
difference in build times.
ccache is fabulous (and it's fabulous
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
20.02.2012 08:35, Paul Anton Letnes kirjoitti:
In the language wars, I have one question.
Why is Fortran not being considered?
Fortran is OK for simple numerical algorithms, but starts to suck
heavily if you need to do any
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Den 20.02.2012 17:42, skrev Sturla Molden:
There are still other options than C or C++ that are worth considering.
One would be to write NumPy in Python. E.g. we could use LLVM as a
JIT-compiler and produce the
Hi Perry,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Perry Greenfield pe...@stsci.edu wrote:
I, like Travis, have my worries about C++. But if those actually doing
the work (and particularly the subsequent support) feel it is the best
language for implementation, I can live with that.
I particularly
1 - 100 of 3689 matches
Mail list logo
