Re: [Nut-upsuser] Cyberpower Value 600E UPS (USB) is not recognized by usbhid-ups under FreeBSD 7.2

2009-05-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, 19 May 2009, forsite wrote: Have anybody tried Cyberpower Value 600E (USB) under FreeBSD? usbhid-ups from nut 2.4.1 does not recognize (find) the device on my machine. [r...@substance /usr/local/libexec/nut]# dmesg | grep uhid uhid0: CPS UPS VALUE, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2 on

[Nut-upsuser] Windows Nut Client supporting hibernate.

2009-05-20 Thread Richard Chapman
I am aware of 2 windows nut clients both interestingly called winnut. One (winnut 2.0.0b) is a service based client based on a port of the but client code (I think). The other is a GUI client based on (I think again) on knutclient . I have corresponded with both authors about a feature

[Nut-upsuser] upsmon shutdown based on Time since power fail.

2009-05-20 Thread Richard Chapman
For various reasons - I have been trying to get my Desktops and/or servers to shut-down a fixed time after a power fail - or better still a fixed time - or a low battery whichever comes first. I note in my upsc: * upsc belkinusb* battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 30

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Cyberpower Value 600E UPS (USB) is not recognized by usbhid-ups under FreeBSD 7.2

2009-05-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: The actual fix is to add an entry in the blacklist for uhid devices in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c (around line 115) for the vendor/id of your UPS. I think you also need to add an entry to /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs for the UPS itself. That

Re: [Nut-upsuser] upsmon shutdown based on Time since power fail.

2009-05-20 Thread Jon Bendtsen
On 20/05/2009, at 12.11, Richard Chapman wrote: For various reasons - I have been trying to get my Desktops and/or servers to shut-down a fixed time after a power fail - or better still a fixed time - or a low battery whichever comes first. [cut] Is there another parameter somewhere -

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Battery test feature of APC Back-UPS RS series

2009-05-20 Thread Arnaud Quette
salut Jean, 2009/5/18 Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org Salut Arnaud, On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:14:47 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: ahah, hem, well to be serious, the game is to identify the report used when doing a battery test. so the best would be to only fire usbsnoop when doing that, in

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Cyberpower Value 600E UPS (USB) is not recognized by usbhid-ups under FreeBSD 7.2

2009-05-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 21 May 2009, forsite wrote: P.S. Apparently, this relates not only to CyberPower, but will likely be relevant for any UPS-USB device which under GENERIC kernel is claimed by uhidX (not ugenX) driver. Yes, it is quite annoying.. I wonder if the uhid device could be modified to reject

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Cyberpower Value 600E UPS (USB) is not recognized by usbhid-ups under FreeBSD 7.2

2009-05-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 21 May 2009, forsite wrote: Daniel, fantastic - your patch was exactly what was needed. Great! 2_developers: I believe this is a standard situation for CyberPower USB devices under FreeBSD. So you may wish to add the solution provided by Daniel into the FAQ or at least to mention on