Re: [Nut-upsuser] Eaton Powerware 5110 - some stats not reported

___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser -- Tim Dawson (tadaw...@tpcsvc.com)Owner/Engineer TPC

Re: [Nut-upsuser] nut in openwrt

xt_mac 608 0 xt_mark 672 0 xt_multiport1184 0 xt_nat 1088 9 xt_state 688 0 xt_tcpudp 1696 23 xt_time 1664 0 Regards. -- Josu Lazkano --- Tim Dawson Lewisville, TX Gaff tape can't

Re: [Nut-upsuser] nut in openwrt

Just looked at your prior mail, and it was using 'usbhid' based on your output. If 'modprobe' exists on your router, what response do you get to 'modprobe usbhid'? - Tim On February 24, 2014 2:56:16 AM CST, Tim Dawson tadaw...@tpcsvc.com wrote: Either it is not loaded, or the usb serial

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Powerware Prestige 9 Series

-- Tim Dawson (tadaw...@tpcsvc.com)Owner/Engineer TPC ServicesBellnet: (972)-221-7385 Lewisville, Texas 75067 Gaff Tape can't fix 'Stupid', but it can muffle the sound

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Git - do I have the right repository?

patch. - Tim On February 28, 2014 5:40:29 PM CST, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: Git: Network UPS Tools - BCMXCP UPS driver 0.28 (2.7.1) RS-232 communication subdriver 0.20 2.7.1: Network UPS Tools - BCMXCP UPS driver 0.26 (2.6.5

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Git - do I have the right repository?

, and Nut was not installed at all prior to this deployment . . . and the git driver signature was from running it from the git build tree with ./bcmxcp . . . - Tim On 02/28/2014 07:57 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: On Feb 28, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: I just noted that I got my outputs

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Git - do I have the right repository?

reason or another that bcmxcp did not regress . . . . - Tim On 02/28/2014 07:57 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: On Feb 28, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: I just noted that I got my outputs reversed in my posting - the git version is the .26, with 2.7.1 being .28, which still seems odd

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Git - do I have the right repository?

I had an old one on my dev box, and mixed and matched . . . . - Tim On 02/28/2014 07:57 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: On Feb 28, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: I just noted that I got my outputs reversed in my posting - the git version is the .26, with 2.7.1 being .28, which still seems

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Liebert PSA On Battery report

Likely because 2.6.3 is not a current release. 2.7.2 (or 3?) is rhe current version, and it makes little sense to backport changes. Nut is a trivial compile . . . 'Use the source, Luke . . .' - Tim On October 17, 2014 6:05:35 PM CDT, Derek Harding de...@lagham.org.uk wrote: Hi, Back in 2011,

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Liebert PSA On Battery report

CDT, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Tim Dawson tadaw...@tpcsvc.com wrote: Likely because 2.6.3 is not a current release. 2.7.2 (or 3?) is rhe current version, and it makes little sense to backport changes. Tim, It's possible that these changes didn't make

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Install problems (group permissions) with nut 2.7.2

___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser -- Tim Dawson 972-567-9360 ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

The "#! " is a *nix thing that exists in every *nix I have ever seen, for as long as I know (mid 1980's for me . . ) and is used to specify what shell is to be loaded to run that script, since there are many, and syntax is not compatible. Without it, the shell already running will try to run

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

mbedded Technologies, Inc. ISO 9001 and AS9100 Certified Ph: +1 814-234-8087 www.rtd.com -Original Message- From: Nut-upsuser [mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+rgroner=rtd@lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:56 PM To: nut-upsuser@lists.aliot

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

: Is a directory ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser -- =

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

gineer Level II RTD Embedded Technologies, Inc. ISO 9001 and AS9100 Certified Ph: +1 814-234-8087 www.rtd.com -Original Message----- From: Tim Dawson [mailto:tadaw...@tpcsvc.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:52 PM To: Rob Groner <rgro...@rtd.com>; nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.de

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Help with failing Nut slave/client connection

Or just set up sane firewall rules to allow the two to talk, but block external traffic. I have run this way for years - all add'rs ar IANA in a subnet block, and just that block is open locally, and all other external IP's severely restricted, and NUT works great . . . - Tim On September 12,

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Help with failing Nut slave/client connection

Tough to get a spoofed IP to actually route back to it's host though, so other than those unfortunate to be on a flat network, still not too much of an issue . . . - Tim On 09/12/2016 04:46 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Tim Dawson wrote: Or just set up sane firewall

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Can't get NUT slave to connect to master

Try ALL:ALL in /etc/hosts.allow temporarily. If that still doesn't work, it's likely something else. If it does, only then screw with creating narrow rules . . . - Tim On November 25, 2016 6:37:02 AM CST, Roger Price wrote: >On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > >>

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem installing NUT on 16.04

Looks like you did - "OL" is shorthand for "On Line" - Tim On December 3, 2016 11:31:46 AM CST, Jack McGee wrote: >On 12/03/2016 10:55 AM, Jack McGee wrote: >> On 12/03/2016 10:35 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> On Dec 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Jack McGee

Re: [Nut-upsuser] battery not installed, but battery still 100% and NUT 2.7.2-4 does not catch this and report a error

Which gets back to the original point I was trying to make. Iy the UPS does a load test (and I'm pretty certain My SmartUPS can, if enabled), you know the battery is failing *before* something face-plants, thus *reducing* risk! I test on all mine, and have never in 15+ years of doing so, had

Re: [Nut-upsuser] battery not installed, but battery still 100% and NUT 2.7.2-4 does not catch this and report a error

NUT can only report what the UPS tells it. IE, if no battery/load test is runs on the UPS, it has no way to know the battery croaked . . . it just sees normal voltage, and says "100% charge" . . . . - Tim On April 3, 2017 10:41:56 AM CDT, Jon Bendtsen wrote: >On

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT not recognising Mini-box OpenUPS 2

a NUT branch that uses libusb-1.0, versus the original libusb-0.1 support. If you set things up to do "apt-get build-dep nut", it will pull in the libusb-dev package (which would cause the ./configure output to say yes for building USB drivers). ______

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Why are LAN ports not standard on UPSs these days?

I'll guess expense, and possibly inherent unreliability in that there is more than a passive interconnect to the server. Having said that, higher end gear appears far more likely to have a LAN port or capability thereof . . . the cheap hope stuff does not, considering that it likely would not

Re: [Nut-upsuser] new NUT release please!

And you can source build the current version from source on pretty much anything, thus negating any value of distro centric packaging . . . On September 10, 2017 4:20:49 PM CDT, Greg Vickers wrote: >I'll take this hit: Dutchman01, why should there be a new version

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with upsmon?

Have you used it prior? A lot of UPSes ship with the battery disconnected . . . - Tim On September 2, 2017 2:08:19 PM CDT, Michele Alzetta wrote: >Following up on this: seems that the battery of this UPS is no longer >working, i.e. if I interrupt the power supply it