On 2010-04-11 20:46, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Dogacan,
>
> +1 to calling it a "web search platform", since I agree, it’s not just a
> crawler.
Ok, good - I'll do the editing and put up the final version for vote.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ ___
Hi Dogacan,
+1 to calling it a "web search platform", since I agree, it’s not just a
crawler.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/11/10 11:40 AM, "Doğacan Güney" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 16:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>> WH
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 16:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
I think it looks good after the minor changes. +1.
Dennis
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Hi,
I was told that the next step is to come up with the proposed Board
resolution and vote it among committers. Here's the proposed text
(shameless copy&paste from Tika and Mahout proposals).
IMPORTANT NOTE: I
Looks good to me after the proposed changes.
--
Sami Siren
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 2010-04-10 15:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>>
On 2010-04-10 15:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> Committee c
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-s
On 2010-04-10 04:13, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> +1, with the following amendment:
>
>>
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> Lucene Nutch sub-project encumbered upon the
>> Apache Nutch Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> This should read:
>
Hi Andrzej,
+1, with the following amendment:
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Lucene Nutch sub-project encumbered upon the
> Apache Nutch Project are hereafter discharged.
This should read:
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Luce
Hi,
I was told that the next step is to come up with the proposed Board
resolution and vote it among committers. Here's the proposed text
(shameless copy&paste from Tika and Mahout proposals).
IMPORTANT NOTE: I removed from the members of the PMC those existing
Nutch committers that haven't been
10 matches
Mail list logo