Re: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server

2005-04-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Chirag, Thanks for your answer and your time. Some other questions to your mail. In that case a central DB server would be okay, and you can move the segments around using rsync to the search servers. I've found this to be a more hassle-free solution that using NDFS, but I'm certain given the

RE: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server

2005-04-15 Thread Chirag Chaman
1. Souped-up DB server - Dual CPU, 4 GB Ram (min) RAID 5 or 10, 1-2 NICS This is the 'fetcher' server? This is you fetch/crawler/indexer -- create the final segments here, then move them to the search server. That way if a search server goes down, simply move the segment to another server.

RE: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server

2005-04-15 Thread Byron Miller
: RE: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server 1. Souped-up DB server - Dual CPU, 4 GB Ram (min) RAID 5 or 10, 1-2 NICS This is the 'fetcher' server? This is you fetch/crawler/indexer -- create the final segments here, then move them to the search server. That way if a search

RE: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server

2005-04-15 Thread Chirag Chaman
@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Nutch-general] RE: Nutch - new public server To add from my experiences: I've preferred Resin (stability performance) I always go for more ram than more servers. It's cheaper in the long run when it comes to man hours and service as well as MTBF for your hardware. Use