Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Andrew Baksh 
I would rather a post about a rarity even if it turns out later not to be so. I 
am sure we all learned a bit more about Dunlin and Curlew Sandpipers. Nothing 
to be embarrassed about, you made the call and handled it well regardless of 
the outcome.

Cheers,

"I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of 
others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence." ~ Frederick 
Douglass

風　Swift as the wind
林　Quiet as the forest
火　Conquer like the fire
山　Steady as the mountain
Sun Tzu  The Art of War

> (\__/)
> (= '.'=)
> (") _ (") 
> Sent from somewhere in the field using my mobile device! 

Andrew Baksh
www.birdingdude.blogspot.com

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert  wrote:
> 
> In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> 
> I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. Having 
> said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump, which I 
> saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight. Well if you 
> can't trust a field guide...
> 
> Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait until 
> you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some said 
> parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs; Its just 
> that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't excuse the 
> animus.
> 
> In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark, 
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> 
> A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. Careless 
> readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the page where it 
> states that a previous instance was ultimately decided because of, wait for 
> it, the white rump!
> 
> The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained above, 
> interjects a bit of confusion.
> 
> Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I will 
> be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> 
> In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed is 
> 'Wolf' 
> 
> Arie
> 
> North Babylon, NY
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> --
> 
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> 
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> 
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> 
> --

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Andrew Baksh 
I would rather a post about a rarity even if it turns out later not to be so. I 
am sure we all learned a bit more about Dunlin and Curlew Sandpipers. Nothing 
to be embarrassed about, you made the call and handled it well regardless of 
the outcome.

Cheers,

"I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of 
others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence." ~ Frederick 
Douglass

風　Swift as the wind
林　Quiet as the forest
火　Conquer like the fire
山　Steady as the mountain
Sun Tzu  The Art of War

> (\__/)
> (= '.'=)
> (") _ (") 
> Sent from somewhere in the field using my mobile device! 

Andrew Baksh
www.birdingdude.blogspot.com

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert  wrote:
> 
> In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> 
> I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. Having 
> said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump, which I 
> saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight. Well if you 
> can't trust a field guide...
> 
> Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait until 
> you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some said 
> parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs; Its just 
> that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't excuse the 
> animus.
> 
> In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark, 
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> 
> A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. Careless 
> readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the page where it 
> states that a previous instance was ultimately decided because of, wait for 
> it, the white rump!
> 
> The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained above, 
> interjects a bit of confusion.
> 
> Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I will 
> be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> 
> In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed is 
> 'Wolf' 
> 
> Arie
> 
> North Babylon, NY
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> --
> 
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> 
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> 
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> 
> --

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread David Nicosia 
We all make mistakes. No worries. I found this VERY helpful in learning
more about DUNLIN and CURLEW SANDPIPERS in basic plumage.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Mike  wrote:

> I'm a fan of getting the word out and giving people a chance to see the
> bird, even if it isn't what we originally thought.
> That said, I'm kind of glad I didn't see this bird! Lol
>
> Mike Cooper
> Ridge, LI
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert 
> wrote:
> >
> > In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> >
> > I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong.
> Having said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump,
> which I saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight.
> Well if you can't trust a field guide...
> >
> > Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait
> until you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some
> said parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs;
> Its just that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't
> excuse the animus.
> >
> > In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark,
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> >
> > A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”.
> Careless readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the
> page where it states that a previous instance was ultimately decided
> because of, wait for it, the white rump!
> >
> > The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained
> above, interjects a bit of confusion.
> >
> > Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I
> will be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> >
> > In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed
> is 'Wolf' 
> >
> > Arie
> >
> > North Babylon, NY
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > http://www.avg.com
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > NYSbirds-L List Info:
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> >
> > ARCHIVES:
> > 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> > 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> > 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> >
> > Please submit your observations to eBird:
> > http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> >
> > --
>
>
> --
>
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
>
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
>
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
>
> --
>
>

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread David Nicosia 
We all make mistakes. No worries. I found this VERY helpful in learning
more about DUNLIN and CURLEW SANDPIPERS in basic plumage.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Mike  wrote:

> I'm a fan of getting the word out and giving people a chance to see the
> bird, even if it isn't what we originally thought.
> That said, I'm kind of glad I didn't see this bird! Lol
>
> Mike Cooper
> Ridge, LI
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert 
> wrote:
> >
> > In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> >
> > I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong.
> Having said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump,
> which I saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight.
> Well if you can't trust a field guide...
> >
> > Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait
> until you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some
> said parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs;
> Its just that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't
> excuse the animus.
> >
> > In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark,
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> >
> > A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”.
> Careless readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the
> page where it states that a previous instance was ultimately decided
> because of, wait for it, the white rump!
> >
> > The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained
> above, interjects a bit of confusion.
> >
> > Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I
> will be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> >
> > In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed
> is 'Wolf' 
> >
> > Arie
> >
> > North Babylon, NY
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > http://www.avg.com
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > NYSbirds-L List Info:
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> > http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> >
> > ARCHIVES:
> > 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> > 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> > 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> >
> > Please submit your observations to eBird:
> > http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> >
> > --
>
>
> --
>
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
>
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
>
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
>
> --
>
>

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Mike 
I'm a fan of getting the word out and giving people a chance to see the bird, 
even if it isn't what we originally thought. 
That said, I'm kind of glad I didn't see this bird! Lol

Mike Cooper
Ridge, LI


Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert  wrote:
> 
> In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> 
> I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. Having 
> said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump, which I 
> saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight. Well if you 
> can't trust a field guide...
> 
> Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait until 
> you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some said 
> parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs; Its just 
> that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't excuse the 
> animus.
> 
> In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark, 
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> 
> A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. Careless 
> readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the page where it 
> states that a previous instance was ultimately decided because of, wait for 
> it, the white rump!
> 
> The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained above, 
> interjects a bit of confusion.
> 
> Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I will 
> be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> 
> In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed is 
> 'Wolf' 
> 
> Arie
> 
> North Babylon, NY
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> --
> 
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> 
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> 
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> 
> --


--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Mike 
I'm a fan of getting the word out and giving people a chance to see the bird, 
even if it isn't what we originally thought. 
That said, I'm kind of glad I didn't see this bird! Lol

Mike Cooper
Ridge, LI


Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert  wrote:
> 
> In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.
> 
> I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. Having 
> said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump, which I 
> saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight. Well if you 
> can't trust a field guide...
> 
> Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait until 
> you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some said 
> parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs; Its just 
> that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't excuse the 
> animus.
> 
> In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark, 
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
> 
> A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. Careless 
> readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the page where it 
> states that a previous instance was ultimately decided because of, wait for 
> it, the white rump!
> 
> The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained above, 
> interjects a bit of confusion.
> 
> Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I will 
> be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
> 
> In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed is 
> 'Wolf' 
> 
> Arie
> 
> North Babylon, NY
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> --
> 
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
> 
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
> 
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
> 
> --


--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

[nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Arie Gilbert 

In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.

I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. 
Having said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white 
rump, which I saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved 
weight. Well if you can't trust a field guide...


Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait 
until you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. 
Some said parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other 
pull-backs; Its just that at the time everyone present concurred on the 
ID. Doesn't excuse the animus.


In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field 
mark, *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study 
IMHO though.


A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. 
Careless readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the 
page where it states that a previous instance was ultimately decided 
because of, wait for it, the white rump!


The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained 
above, interjects a bit of confusion.


Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I 
will be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )


In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed 
is 'Wolf' 


Arie

North Babylon, NY

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

[nysbirds-l] Curlew Sandpiper vs Dunlin in Basic Plumage

2017-09-27 Thread Arie Gilbert 

In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.”  Yep.

I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. 
Having said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white 
rump, which I saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved 
weight. Well if you can't trust a field guide...


Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait 
until you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. 
Some said parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other 
pull-backs; Its just that at the time everyone present concurred on the 
ID. Doesn't excuse the animus.


In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as 
taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field 
mark, *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study 
IMHO though.


A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. 
Careless readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the 
page where it states that a previous instance was ultimately decided 
because of, wait for it, the white rump!


The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained 
above, interjects a bit of confusion.


Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I 
will be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )


In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed 
is 'Wolf' 


Arie

North Babylon, NY

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--