Thanks for that. It seems closer to 1.0a than 2. Can I ask when you
started work on OAuth enabling your API?
On Jun 8, 8:37 pm, Lee Hambley lee.hamb...@gmail.com wrote:
sure, herehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-10looks like it
might be an rfc now
On 8 June 2010 20:58, Shak
Apologies, could you explain or provide a resource that explains what
DraftHammer is?
On Jun 8, 4:15 pm, Lee Hambley lee.hamb...@gmail.com wrote:
We opted to implement DraftHammer r10 - as it seemed to be a nice balance
between 1.0a and the changes coming in 2.0 - although the whole
Right, that is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 = OAuth 1.0a with some
corrections.
On 6/8/10 1:37 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
sure, here http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-10 looks like
it might be an rfc now
On 8 June 2010 20:58, Shak ssha...@gmail.com
mailto:ssha...@gmail.com
Right, that was our take on it too… but does it have a formal name yet? Or
just RFC5849 ?
On 8 June 2010 21:40, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
Right, that is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 = OAuth 1.0a with some
corrections.
On 6/8/10 1:37 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
sure, here
On 6/8/10 1:43 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Right, that was our take on it too… but does it have a formal name yet?
Or just RFC5849 ?
RFC 5849 is about as formal as it gets. :)
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Peter, Sold! (But did the 1.0 specification, or 1.0a (pre D.H) make it to an
RFC?) Feel free to not answer and I'll google it when I'm home!
On 8 June 2010 21:53, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 6/8/10 1:43 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Right, that was our take on it too… but does it
On 6/8/10 2:01 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Peter, Sold! (But did the 1.0 specification, or 1.0a (pre D.H) make it
to an RFC?) Feel free to not answer and I'll google it when I'm home!
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 is entitled The OAuth 1.0 Protocol
and the introduction to that document says:
Thanks peter! Wasn't up to Reading iton a small screen, appreciate the
paste though. Good night!
On 08.06.2010, at 22:27, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 6/8/10 2:01 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Peter, Sold! (But did the 1.0 specification, or 1.0a (pre D.H) make
it
to an RFC?)
