RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear!

2002-08-15 Thread nlappa
, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear! Insanity prevails. I drove the bridge last night. I ask why demark the bicycle/trash lane at all? I witnessed it promote poor behaviour from both a bike rider and a car: -Bike traveling southbound

RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear!

2002-08-12 Thread Les Humphreys (K)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear! Insanity prevails. I drove the bridge last night. I ask why demark the bicycle/trash lane at all? I witnessed it promote poor behaviour from both a bike

RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear!

2002-08-12 Thread David Bilenkey
to ride the damn thing! :-) David Bilenkey -Original Message- From: Les Humphreys (K) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 12, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OBC Subject: RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear! The problem is historical - before renovations were complete

Re: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear!

2002-08-12 Thread Peter Tregunno
Hi All, It's not the road engineer that needs to ride the bike lane, it's the (non-engineer) planner who thinks that the bike lane is a good thing(tm), and _requires_ that any design has a bike lane in it. The same thing happened at with the City when the centre town traffic calming measures

RE: [obc] Champlain Bridge - Oh dear!

2002-08-12 Thread Kevin Nelson
Instead of sighing out loud on this forum, why not try calling or e-mailing someone at the NCC? The bridge is new, the three lane idea is new problems will be worked out I'm sure but unless they are made aware of the problems they can't be worked out. I doubt anybody from the NCC