Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your suggestion, I will give a more comprehensive changelog in
patch v2 later.
thanks,
Jun
On 2018/3/2 7:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:37:50 +0800 piaojun wrote:
>
>> Hi Changwei,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply, please see my
Hi Changwei,
On 2018/3/2 13:53, Changwei Ge wrote:
> On 2018/3/2 10:09, piaojun wrote:
>> Hi Changwei,
>>
>> On 2018/3/2 9:49, Changwei Ge wrote:
>>> Hi Jun,
>>> I still have some doubts about your problematic situation description .
>>> Please check my reply inline your sequence diagram.
>>>
>>>
Hi Changwei,
On 2018/3/2 9:49, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Jun,
> I still have some doubts about your problematic situation description .
> Please check my reply inline your sequence diagram.
>
> On 2018/3/1 20:38, piaojun wrote:
>> Hi Changwei,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply, please see my
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:37:50 +0800 piaojun wrote:
> Hi Changwei,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply, please see my comments below.
>
> On 2018/3/1 17:39, Changwei Ge wrote:
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> > On 2018/3/1 17:27, piaojun wrote:
> >> We should not handle migrate lockres if we
Hi Changwei,
Thanks for your quick reply, please see my comments below.
On 2018/3/1 17:39, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> On 2018/3/1 17:27, piaojun wrote:
>> We should not handle migrate lockres if we are already in
>> 'DLM_CTXT_IN_SHUTDOWN', as that will cause lockres remains after
>>
We should not handle migrate lockres if we are already in
'DLM_CTXT_IN_SHUTDOWN', as that will cause lockres remains after
leaving dlm domain. At last other nodes will get stuck into infinite
loop when requsting lock from us.
N1 N2 (owner)