[Ocfs2-devel] What's the need of OCFS2_INODE_MAYBE_ORPHANED?

Hi, From the comments in fs/ocfs2/inode.h:90 it seems, this was used in legacy ocfs2 systems when a node received unlink votes. Since unlink votes has been done away with and replaced with open locks, is this flag still required? If yes, why? From my ongoing investigation of unlink() times, it

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] What's the need of OCFS2_INODE_MAYBE_ORPHANED?

Hi Goldwyn, On 01/08/2014 04:12 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: Hi, From the comments in fs/ocfs2/inode.h:90 it seems, this was used in legacy ocfs2 systems when a node received unlink votes. Since unlink votes has been done away with and replaced with open locks, is this flag still required?

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] What's the need of OCFS2_INODE_MAYBE_ORPHANED?

On 01/08/2014 07:12 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: Hi Srini, On 01/08/2014 07:29 PM, Srinivas Eeda wrote: Hi Goldwyn, On 01/08/2014 04:12 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: Hi, From the comments in fs/ocfs2/inode.h:90 it seems, this was used in legacy ocfs2 systems when a node received unlink