, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Sunil Mushran sunil.mush...@oracle.com
mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com wrote:
I meant repeats 60 secs at a stretch. If not, as it seems so, then the
messages
should be only annoying.
VMFS uses SCSI Reservation to perform disk based locking. See if they have
some
be kvm related. Maybe. I am guessing here.
See the ubuntu bug db. Maybe they have another report of a similar
issue. That may tell us more.
On 12/14/2010 11:17 PM, Andreas Rittershofer wrote:
Am 15.12.2010 um 08:04 schrieb Sunil Mushran:
On 12/14/2010 10:59 PM, Andreas Rittershofer wrote:
My
sd 1:0:0:0: reservation conflict
That's the cause of the error in the guest. You'll have to track the error
to ESX's management domain. See the logs.
Does this error come repeatedly? This error is only a problem for o2hb
if it continues for the next 60 secs. Else it can be ignored.
On
):o2hb_do_disk_heartbeat:753 ERROR: status = -5
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Sunil Mushran sunil.mush...@oracle.com
mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com wrote:
sd 1:0:0:0: reservation conflict
That's the cause of the error in the guest. You'll have to track the error
to ESX's
On 12/14/2010 10:59 PM, Andreas Rittershofer wrote:
My log says suddenly:
Dec 14 02:35:16 hp1 kernel: [1492482.232822] o2net: no longer connected to
node hp2 (num 1) at 192.168.1.2:
Dec 14 02:35:18 hp1 kernel: [1492483.960150] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck
for 61s! [kvm:32398]
I
Can you email me the following:
debugfs.ocfs2 -R stats /dev/mapper/3600a0b800067df8303ba4ba0f5ef
debugfs.ocfs2 -R stat dd-1G /dev/mapper/3600a0b800067df8303ba4ba0f5ef
This will tell us the fs params and the file layout.
Next run the same with different blocksizes. Run the same with
Please can you add this info to a bugzilla to make it easier to track.
I delete emails freq and thus lose context.
To that, attach the output of the following script.
http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/debug/scripts/stat_sysdir.sh
Also, can you isolate the issue to a file. As in, even if you are
The interconnect is the problem. Don't use crossover cables. Use a gige link
with a proper switch. That's what the world uses.
On 12/09/2010 02:10 AM, frank wrote:
Hi,
we have recently started to use ocfs2 on some RHEL 5.5 servers (ocfs2-1.4.7)
Some days ago, two servers sharing an ocfs2
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.26.y.git;a=blob;f=fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c;h=4060bb328bc8a08c22bbd77c59835d757ebdcda5;hb=refs/tags/v2.6.26.2#l265265
if (dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres))
266 BUG();
Known issue.
ocfs2 is a shared-disk cluster file system. It does not do replication.
If you want to use local disks, you could explore using drbd (replicating
block device). Google drbd and ocfs2 for more on this.
On 12/07/2010 11:11 PM, Linux Cook wrote:
Hi!
I've just setup DM-Multipath with OCFS2 for
http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f667766cb67ed05b4d706aa82e8ad0b12eaae8b
That specific error has been addressed in the upcoming 1.4.8.
Attach the logs and all other info to a bugzilla.
On 12/08/2010 05:07 PM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing from the
Check the kernel stack of the D state processes.
cat /proc/PID/stack
The kernel stack will tell us where it is waiting. My guess is that
the io stack is slow. Slow ios appear as temporary hangs to the
users.
On 12/07/2010 07:45 AM, Jan Wielemaker wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty new to ocfs2 and a bit
On 12/07/2010 10:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
Sorry, I cannot comment on future product releases.
Sunil, he was asking about RHEL 6, not 5.
My answer was for RHEL6.
___
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
:*Sunil
On 12/05/2010 07:19 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, veeraa bose wrote:
I have found the new release of ocfs2 in
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/RedHat/RHEL5/x86_64/1.4.8-1/ ,
where I find the specification about the new release.
Yes, the website doesn't seem to have
On 12/06/2010 03:34 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
OCFS2 1.4.8 is not released yet. Yes, some rpms have been uploaded. But
it is still a work-in-progress. We will send out an announcement once all
that
is completed. Hopefully sometime this week.
OCFS2 1.6 is not a separate package but is part of the
On 11/30/2010 10:03 AM, pica pica wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having trouble compiling ocfs2-tools-1.6.3 on slackware64-13.1
These are my configure flags (the last 2 I added after googling this problem,
but didn't help):
./configure \
--sbindir=/sbin \
--bin=/bin \
It looks ok as far as the ocfs2-tools build scripts are concerned.
Note no -static. But I don't know anything about slackware build
environment.
Easiest would be to rerun the same command with -lpthread. See if
that works.
# cd .../fsck.ocfs2
# gcc -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
On 11/30/2010 07:47 PM, pica pica wrote:
Some progress: I added -lpthread my build script (see bellow) and I got past
fsck.ocfs2, but now get stuck at o2image :(
It seems that -lpthread was not used here, but I could see that it was
everywhere else. Is this right?
make[1]: Entering
it:
gcc
make
python-dev
python-gtk2
pkg-config
e2fslibs-dev
uuid-dev
libncurses5-dev
libreadline-dev
libglib2.0-dev
24 ноября 2010 г. 0:25 пользователь Sunil Mushran
sunil.mush...@oracle.com mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com написал:
Probably better if you deinstall the package. That way
. Would it
be safe to assume then, that only when -all- of the Contig numbers in
the extent_alloc output fall below the Clusters per Group X Bits per
Cluster number is the no space issue triggered?
-Norm
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:39 -0800, Sunil Mushran wrote:
The length of allocator chains
) and ready to install it.
I'm going to use checkinstall to build package.
So, do I need to uninstall my 1.4.1-1 ocfs2-tools or I can install it above?
Thanks again.
20 ноября 2010 г. 20:41 пользователь Sunil Mushran sunil.mush...@oracle.com
mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com написал:
Whether
The length of allocator chains in the global bitmap depends on
the size of the volume and block/cluster sizes. It is created during
format and only grows if the volume is grown. That's it.
On 11/23/2010 11:04 AM, Norman P. B. Joseph wrote:
This is related to the No space on OCFS2 volume error
What does the stack of [ocfs2rec] thread look like?
On 11/22/2010 07:31 AM, Welterlen Benoit wrote:
Hi,
I have a new question ;-)
Our cluster is now working with sctp and pcmk stack.
When a node is lost or the eth is down, pcmk is fencing the other node
and a recovery is made and all
to work?
Thanks.
2010/11/19 Sunil Mushran sunil.mush...@oracle.com
mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com
Yes, indexed dirs removes this limit. For that you'll need to
upgrade the kernel/fs and the tools. Best if the kernel is .32 or
higher. The tools should be 1.6.x. Debian has a drop
Yes, indexed dirs removes this limit. For that you'll need to upgrade the
kernel/fs and the tools. Best if the kernel is .32 or higher. The tools should
be 1.6.x. Debian has a drop of 1.6.3 tools. Check if they have built it.
You can read about this and other features in the ocfs2 1.6 user's
Did you notice this with the classic o2cb stack or are you using pacemaker/cman?
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Dzianis Kahanovich maha...@bspu.unibel.by wrote:
drbd+ocfs2 on Gentoo (own modifyed ebuilds).
Usually I run fsck.ocfs2 -fy on boot and it happened only on both nodes
reboot, mount
Is iptables running on node3? If so, stop it.
On 11/9/2010 3:42 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
Hi Tao,
yes , on the three nodes theMax Node Slots is 8
echo 'stats'|debugfs.ocfs2 /dev/sdc1|grep Slots
debugfs.ocfs2 1.4.3
Max Node Slots: 8
Regards,
Alain
Tao Ma a écrit :
Hi Alain,
On
The datavolume mount option is not necessary for mounts that hold
the db files. You could instead set filesystemio_options in init.ora as
explained in the user's guide.
On 11/1/2010 12:37 AM, Rafa Carreres wrote:
Hi,
The facts
I have a cluster running Oracle RAC with two nodes accesing a
on 2.6.32...
...maybe there is a case for getting this sort of extremely useful
feature into the 2.6.32 trunk? (The no space left on device problem
is arguably a bug anyway...)
Just a thought from the peanut gallery.
- Pat
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Sunil Mushran
sunil.mush
You'll have to run fsck.ocfs2 -fy to clear the older orphaned inodes.
The upgrade will prevent future occurrences of this issue.
On 10/26/2010 02:43 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:52 -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
That said, the first issue (-17) is a known one that was fixed
On 10/26/2010 09:59 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
I actually did that right after rebooting into the new kernel. The
system ran fine for a day, but the kernel bug showed up after the backup
script ran.
My setup is the following: I have two servers sharing OCFS2 filesystems
through one dedicated
On 10/26/2010 10:39 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:14 -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
So the backup server is not part of the cluster but yet reading the
same block device. As long as it is only reading, it should not affect
the two nodes, but I will not trust the backup
Means that the reboot is not shutting down the services in order.
Ensure ocfs2 fs is unmounting before the network shutdown.
On 10/23/2010 11:27 AM, veeraa bose wrote:
Hi All,
We have ocfs2 node cluster with oracle 11G RAC running,
The node2 got crashed automatically, when i rebooted node one
This does not look like a 2.6.35. The stack trace says 2.6.32. But I could not
match it to a stable 2.6.32 too. It looks more like 2.6.32 + patches. It is
hard to diagnose a problem without the source.
That said, the first issue (-17) is a known one that was fixed in 2.6.34.
commit
Take a stack trace of the hang. If you are on 2.6.32, you could do:
# find /proc -name stack | while read A ; do D=$(dirname $A); echo $A;
cat $D/cmdline; echo ; cat $A; echo ; done;
Attach the output to a bugzilla on oss.oracle.com.
On 10/15/2010 08:16 AM, Emil Noether wrote:
Hi,
I have a
it is a prime time of my web and
my customers are already quite upset. But I can try it tommorow morning.
Regards,
Emil Noether
On 10/15/2010 07:22 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
Take a stack trace of the hang. If you are on 2.6.32, you could do:
# find /proc -name stack | while read A ; do D
It should be fine... as far as the code is concerned. But I'll let
someone who has actually run it in prod, confirm.
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:59 +1100, Ram Smith wrote:
Hi Crew,
After an aborted upgrade last night we are left with some nodes on our
Oracle RAC cluster running ocfs2 1.4.4 and
Are you using the mount option nordirplus on the nfs client? The users guide
has more on this.
On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:23 AM, veeraa bose veeraa.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
we have installed the below ocfs2 version and exported the ocfs2 FS over nfs
to some other nfs clients.
rpm -qa |
All,
We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.6.
The file system is bundled with Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel that is
available for Oracle Linux 5.
The user's guide for this release is available at the following link.
] -
Am 21.09.2010 22:47, schrieb Sunil Mushran:
There should have been another message possible just above the cut
here
saying possibly that the there were not enough credits, or something
about
a running or committing transaction.
On 09/21/2010 12:38 AM, Georg Höllrigl wrote:
Hello
There should have been another message possible just above the cut here
saying possibly that the there were not enough credits, or something about
a running or committing transaction.
On 09/21/2010 12:38 AM, Georg Höllrigl wrote:
Hello,
I got a crashed server when using ocfs2 on SLES10 with
It is oopsing 6-8 secs after the mount. ;)
The stack trace does not show ocfs2/drbd. It is pointing to slub. But
you have to read that with a pinch of salt. This just could be a case
of some memory being scribbled.
On 09/17/2010 11:39 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
Hello
I have an active-active DRBD
On 09/16/2010 09:06 AM, Enrique Sanchez wrote:
Currently a large number of OCFS2 clusters and while the paperwork
trolls have been pretty good at keeping us in pretty decent shape,
I've been trying to create dynamic documentation of the several
servers we maintain, right now I am hitting the
Can you describe your usage and your setup a bit?
On 09/07/2010 11:55 AM, Dan Lark wrote:
I know this has been discussed before, but I am seeing high iowait times and
the occasional deadlock between my two node OCFS2 cluster. I will be turning
on noatime for the mount on both nodes in a
Which kernel are you using?
We have fixed this issue in mainline. We will soon have the same
fix for production kernels.
On 09/07/2010 02:06 PM, Todd Freeman wrote:
From reading the archives I can see this issue has been hit before but
I haven't found a resolution.
I have a 50gb
The stack points to netlink. ocfs2 does not use netlink. That it reproduced
with ocfs2 may just mean that the particular load triggers it. That's it.
On 09/03/2010 05:21 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
What we have:
2x Debian 5.0 x64 - 2.6.32-20~bpo50+1 from backports
DRBD + OCFS2 1.4.1-1
Can you attach some info in the bz. Like a iostat run for a minute
or more. top output, showing active processes. If the slowdown
is being observed by any one process, maybe a strace -p pid -T -ttt -o
/tmp/out
output.
On 07/28/2010 05:28 AM, Jeronimo Bezerra wrote:
Guys,
comments or
Have you tried mounting with data=writeback ?
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:31 PM, wanchat padungrat wancha...@pantip.com wrote:
Dear all,
Not realy sure whether this is bug or not, but we found that sometimes OCFS2
on our system do journaling a lot.
(Please see screen shot below)
As you can
ocfs2 is a shared disk cfs. Meaning it expects the disk/vol to be
accessible by all nodes. Using fiber channel, iscsi, etc.
On 07/14/2010 12:03 PM, Alexander Nagel wrote:
Hi,
I'am new to ocfs2 filesystem and I have some questions about it.
I installed three server according to the user guide
You are attempting to remove a lock resource that is still active.
This is an app bug.
On 07/06/2010 11:51 AM, Charlie Sharkey wrote:
I'm seeing an occasional error on the nodes from a two node cluster.
Is this something I should be concerned about ?
Sles10 sp2 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp x86_64
tunefs.ocfs2 --cloned-volume
The man page has the details. Ensure you run the command only on the
cloned volume.
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Devender Narula
devendernar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi guys
i got one Ocfs2 mount point running on RHEL 5.4 .. we are about to
configuring
On 06/28/2010 07:57 AM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Garcia, Raymundo
raymundo.gar...@philips.com wrote:
Hello… it was put under my attention that a partition we have in one of our
production system was displaying wrong size with df command…. 123 GB… but
On 06/28/2010 09:37 AM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Sunil Mushransunil.mush...@oracle.com
wrote:
ocfs2 is a journaled file system. But it is also a clustered file system.
So it cannot arbitrarily delete orphaned files because they could still be
in use
For issues on sles, file a bz with Novell. Make sure you list out
the fs features that had been enabled.
On 06/15/2010 07:08 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
My O/S is Suse Linux Enteprise Server 11 Service Pack 1.
My SCSI device is a hardware iSCSI RAID chassis. I have done a
variety of reads
As far as ocfs2 is concerned, the current version of ocfs2 1.2
is ocfs2 1.2.9. You will find the packages for your kernel on
oss.oracle.com. The news section has the list of changes/bugs fixed.
asmlib also has some updates. You can review the fixes to see
whether an upgrade is warranted.
For
- bpkr...@gmail.com wrote:
Patrick J. LoPresti lopre...@gmail.com 2010-06-13 19:14:
Hello. I am experimenting with OCFS2 on Suse Linux Enterprise
Server
11 Service Pack 1.
I am performing various stress tests. My current exercise involves
writing to files using a
- lopre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I am experimenting with OCFS2 on Suse Linux Enterprise Server
11 Service Pack 1.
I am performing various stress tests. My current exercise involves
writing to files using a shared-writable mmap() from two nodes.
(Each
node mmaps and writes to
We could remove this check. If you want this in your sles kernel, the
quickest route will be via Novell. We'll need both sles and mainline
patched.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti
lopre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I am experimenting with OCFS2 on a brand new 10GigE iSCSI
Other than a longer pause. No other negative side effects. Processes
that have the locks at the required level will continue to do io.
Processes that need to upconvert a lock and need the dead node to
respond, will have to wait for the deadthreshold to expire before
recovery can clean out
You mean the next version of 1.4 tools? Not anytime soon I'm afraid.
That patch needs to be pushed to the 1.4 branch before you can build it.
On 06/04/2010 10:42 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
Sunil, Tao,
Can you tell me an estimation when a new tools package with this patch will
be available, I
On 06/01/2010 04:06 AM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag wrote:
snip
Feature Compat: 3 backup-super strict-journal-super
Feature Incompat: 8016 sparse extended-slotmap inline-data
metaecc xattr indexed-dirs refcount
Tunefs Incomplete: 0
Feature RO
was formatted using:
mkfs.ocfs2 --fs-feature-level=max-features -L ocfs2disk -N 10 -T mail
-v /dev/sdb
So i thought that i can now use features like unwritten, inline-data
and indexed-dirs.
Stefan
Sunil Mushran schrieb:
On 06/01/2010 04:06 AM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag wrote:
snip
The kernel is old. We fixed this issue in 2.6.30. We have also backported
it to the 1.4 production tree.
The problem was that the inodes being created did not have locality
leading to a directory having inodes that were spaced far apart from
each other. The one place where it really affected
that was the
bottleneck in the first place.
On 06/01/2010 11:00 AM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag wrote:
No not but bonnie is still as slow as before when creating and
deleting files. I thought this should be fixed when using indexed-dirs.
Stefan
Sunil Mushran schrieb:
Are you having any
-107 means the node lost connection with the other node. The messages
below appear cut-pastes and not in sequence. So I cannot tell for sure
what happened next. What should have happened is that the node would
then go into quorum mode followed by recovery mode.
Sunil
On 05/26/2010 05:38 AM,
When a node dies, the cluster ops pause for the node to be first
declared dead followed by recovery. Threshold governs the time
it takes to declare the node dead. The higher the value, the longer
the pause.
ocfs2 does not reset without a log message. Do you have netconsole
setup? Messages logged
On 05/26/2010 01:39 PM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
ocfs2 does not reset without a log message. Do you have netconsole
setup? Messages logged a tick before reset can only be captured by
netconsole/kdump etc.
Unfortunately no. Here are the two lines in /var/log/message prior to the
Fragmentation has been atop our dev priority list for sometime
now. That is, both, reducing it and handling it better when it does
get fragmented.
Just last week we pushed patches for the same into the newly
created 2.6.35.
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2010-May/006511.html
As
Versions?
On May 20, 2010, at 6:47 AM, stephane lomine stephane.lom...@fr.clara.net
wrote:
Hello
Sorry if ask a question already seen before but i'm new to ocfs2
and was not able to find a proper answer on the web.
We re using ocfs2 on a two nodes system with SAN disks.
We need to
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2-tools/news/article_8.html
We did make a related change in fsck in that release. Do you mind
creating a bugzilla for this? Do mention the arch. I can then send you
a debug version of the tool that'll tell us why it is behaving like that
on your machine.
On
The fs is oopsing when trying to remove a entry from the orphan dir.
It could be that that orphaned inode is corrupted. You could try
running fsck.ocfs2 - fy /dev/sdX. Better if you ping Novell support
for assistance.
On May 17, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Georg Höllrigl
georg.hoellr...@xidras.com
ocfs2 disks
Start oracle cluster
/on rest of the nodes
This plan will need to be done in a quiet period of the system, otherwise the
running node will have to much pressure on it.
Regards
Morten K
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com
On 05/10/2010 11:53 PM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag wrote:
Do you mean the trunk at all?
http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-tools.git;a=summary
Yes.
2.) Is there a release date for 1.6?
We are planning to do a beta release for el6. No dates as yet.
Ping Novell for dates
On 05/10/2010 01:33 PM, Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag wrote:
1.) Is ocfs2-tools 1.6 considered as stable?
Mostly. We push changes to the tree only after it passes all the tests.
2.) Is there a release date for 1.6?
We are planning to do a beta release for el6. No dates as yet.
av* Sunil Mushran
*Sendt:* 7. mai 2010 19:07
*Til:* ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
*Emne:* Re: [Ocfs2-users] Kernel panic when deleting a file
Unsure why you have to build the packages when they are downloadable.
Please use the packages provided on oss.
On 05/07/2010 06:26 AM, Kristiansen Morten
On 05/10/2010 05:18 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
Upgrade to el5 u4 kernel. 2.6.18-164.el5. ocfs2 1.2 is provided for
all el5 kernels upto u4.
Correction. It is provided on el5 upto u3. 2.6.18-128.el5.
___
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users
Unsure why you have to build the packages when they are downloadable.
Please use the packages provided on oss.
On 05/07/2010 06:26 AM, Kristiansen Morten wrote:
Hi again,
This time I try attach a jpeg.
Regards
Morten K
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
Cannot say for sure. It could be a deadlock (bug) too. As in, I don't
want to
blame any one entity without knowing more.
If it were up to me, I'd start with the dlm. See which node holds the lock
that others are waiting on. Then see why that node is unable to downconvert
that lock. As in, if the
Werner Flamme wrote:
Unfortunately, I do not run the Oracle RAC. The RAC runs with Oracle
Unbreakable Linux. I am sorry for that decision, but I can't change it.
SAP does not forbid to use Oracle's version of Linux. SAP only says that
SAP systems are fully supported on RHEL or SLES only
Werner Flamme wrote:
this is what I do. But since the version on the RAC server is newer than
mine, I cannot mount the filesystem (I quoted the error in a previous
mail). That's why I try to compile the sources from Oracle. I'd rather
deinstall the SLES version and switch over to the newer
Your setup may not have persistent device naming. You can
use blkid or mounted.ocfs2 to discover the ocfs2 devices.
Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
Hello Guys,
After upgrade to 1.4.7-1 my FS does not mount anymore. Just after
upgrade rpm, FS mount and works fine, but after reboot server, it does
1.4 tree is only meant to be build against EL5 U2+. Not SLES
nor any other kernel tree. SLES9/10/11 already includes ocfs2.
Werner Flamme wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
next VM, next trouble :-(
Now I work inside a VM with SLES 11. Configuring ocfs2-1.4.7 (via
All,
We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.4.7-1 and OCFS2 Tools
1.4.4-1 for Oracle's and Red Hat's Enterprise Linux 5 Update 2 and higher.
Oracle's Unbreakable Linux Network users who are subscribing to the OCFS2
1.4 packages for Enterprise Linux 5 channel can upgrade to this
No NoNone
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:48:39 -0700
Sunil Mushran sunil.mush...@oracle.com wrote:
In findpath lockname, the lockname needs to be in angular brackets.
Did you manage to trap the oops stack trace of the crash?
So the dlm on the master says that node 250 has a PR
Of Sunil Mushran
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:08 PM
To: ocfs2-annou...@oss.oracle.com; ocfs2-users
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 1.4.7-1 and OCFS2 Tools 1.4.4-1 released
All,
We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.4.7-1 and OCFS2 Tools
1.4.4-1 for Oracle's and Red Hat's Enterprise
We are hoping to release it anyday now.
Have you filed a bug about your issue? I have no recollection of any
reports of such an issue. Orphan scanning has not changed in 1.4.7.
File a bz. We'll need to get more information to understand the
problem you are encountering.
Mailing List SVR wrote:
this
could become an issue again.
David
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Sunil Mushran
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:14 PM
To: li...@svrinformatica.it
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re
Joel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:31:02PM +0200, Kristiansen Morten wrote:
I discovered our four node cluster running on RedHat EL5, Ocfs2 1.2.6 and
Oracle 10.2.0.3 have memory leak. I suspect ocfs2, but I could be wrong. I
suspect ocfs2 because when we run RMAN backup the free
Ping Oracle Support. They will be able to answer qs on OracleVM.
You are seeing 4 paths because they might be multipathed. Check your
iscsi configuration.
Use blkid to determine which two paths are the same.
e.g.
/dev/sdf1: LABEL=label1 UUID=908a0229-88c3-4a0d-b6bc-38c43c6b1461
TYPE=ocfs2
It is having problems doing ios to the virtual devices. -5 is EIO.
ke...@utahsysadmin.com wrote:
I have a relatively new test environment setup that is a little different
from your typical scenario. This is my first time using OCFS2, but I
believe it should work the way I have it setup.
All
files for the other nodes to see. If
the partition was mounted read-only, would that cause another node to think
that the read-only node has failed?
Thanks,
Kevin
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:03:52 -0700, Sunil Mushran
sunil.mush...@oracle.com wrote:
ocfs2 can handle multiple writers
If fs_locks -B is empty, then the processes are not waiting on a
cluster lock.
Process pegged at 100% cpu means it is actively waiting to acquire a
spinlock.
Is the other process running?
Unfortunately in EL5 there is no clean way to get the kernel stack for a
process.
echo t
any extra debug logging actually was created.
David
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:23 PM
To: Angelo McComis
Cc: David Murphy; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Odd error on FC12 with ocfs2
What's the current size of the partition? The error indicates
that the partition has not been resized.
Mattia Gandolfi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a new OCFS2 user, I'm trying to implement a 2-nodes cluster with a
shared fs, and I'm facing an issue while trying to resize an existing
ocfs2
Yes and without the trailing nulls.
Florin Andrei wrote:
So what would happen if we use 1.4 instead? Would the logger keep
logging data and the user would be able to read the new lines normally
while node A is down?
On 03/30/2010 11:42 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
What you are seeing
I checked. The core support for xattr in tools was added in 1.4.2.
We plan on pinging ubuntu to pick up tools 1.6 (when it is ready)
that has xattr support enabled by default.
Frank Lahm wrote:
Hi,
although official Oracle documentation indeed suggests that EA should
not work if ocfs-tool is
If node A is a lower node number than node B, then the behavior
is correct. In a 2 node cluster, if the two nodes cannot talk to each
other, the higher node number will fence itself. Also, when a node
mounts a volume, it initiates connections to other live nodes. If any
connection fails, the mount
used 1.50 for the OCFS kernel module and
CentOS 5.3/5.4 use 1.4.4-1. Am I correct in thinking this?
David
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:46 PM
To: David Murphy
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re
Connection to 192.168.102.141 port [tcp/cbt] succeeded!
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:08 PM
To: David Murphy
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Odd error on FC12 with ocfs2
What
201 - 300 of 943 matches
Mail list logo
