Jonathan Stickel wrote:
>
> Yes, I think dlmread should move into core octave.  Might as well move
> csvread into core octave also since it is just a wrapper to dlmread.
> There still exists another dlmread m-file in octave-forge.  Unless
> there is a good reason not to, I think it should be deleted.
I believe its better to keep octave-forge aligned with the Octave 3.0.x
tree at the moment and dlmread/dlmwrite/csvread if they are included in
Octave would go on the 3.1.x branch. Therefore, the two versions should
coexist for a while longer..

D.



>
> Regards,
> Jonathan
>


-- 
David Bateman                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to