Hi Thomas,
3) I don't like the idea that an OutputFcn should be able to modify the
solution vector (because of the word 'Output'), but I like YOUR idea! We have
reached a state with OdePkg where we are, let's say, 'highly compatible' to
Matlab but now it seems that we are breaking the
Alois Schlögl wrote:
Hi,
thanks for pointing this out. Actually, I was not aware that I used at
some ancient times the LGPL. Its fine with me changing the license to
GPL v2 or later.
Nowawdays, I'm using GPL v3 or later. Is there any specific reason not
to move to GPL v3 ?
Alois
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Does someone know the copyright holders/years and the licensing conditions
for the files under doc/latex/ of nnet? We need this information in order
to release the octave-nnet Debian package.
Thanks,
The changelog contains
2007-02-18 12:44 michaelschmid
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The COPYING file of the TSA package says that it is released under the GNU
GPL, but most of the inst/*.m files are released under the GNU Library
General Public License. Could you please fix this?
Alois pointed out to me that this is already fixed in the SVN and
Marco Caliari schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
3) I don't like the idea that an OutputFcn should be able to modify
the solution vector (because of the word 'Output'), but I like YOUR
idea! We have reached a state with OdePkg where we are, let's say,
'highly compatible' to Matlab but now it seems that
