Re: [OctDev] [Fwd: Re: Add a logdet function?]

2008-04-23 Thread David Bateman
Fredrik Lingvall wrote: I don't know the numerical details of the different methods (e.g. chol2logdet vs. qr2logdet). In a similar way, I don't know if I should invert a matrix using SVD or QR. I really love that when I compute the inverse of a matrix using 'inv', Octave chooses the

Re: [OctDev] [Fwd: Re: Add a logdet function?]

2008-04-23 Thread Fredrik Lingvall
David Bateman wrote: Yes that would be preferable but I don't think Octave (3.0.0) keeps track of if the matrix is symmetric (pos def), at least a test I did with for example, A = diag(1:4,1) + 10*eye(5) + diag(1:4,-1); matrix_type (A) ans = Positive Definite b = A \ ones(5,1)