Thanks for the guick response! I merged both, headers and sources, into only one header and one source, and it worked fine independently of the order of loading. That is both classes/objects are now in the same file.
Thanks again. Regards, Pablo On Miércoles 16 Junio 2010 10:13:21 Michael Goffioul escribió: > As the 2 classes/objects are inter-dependent, I think it's better to > include both into the same .oct file. What's happening is that channel.oct > is not loaded into memory when octave loads analoginput.oct, leading to > unresolved references. This does not happen when channel.oct is loaded > explicitely first. > > This is only possible, because Linux (and the like) allows to have > unresolved references at link time. This wouldn't work under Windows > for instance (or you would have to link one oct file against the other > one). > > Michael. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
