yes, going with 3.0 is the best choice. but i guess that ship has sailed for
indiana already.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:33:53 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> While OpenSSL now
> promises that all later 3.x versions will be backwards compatible with 3.0,
> they are also promising a longer support
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:23:33 +0100, Marcel Telka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
>> as you know there're still some packages in the repo that use openssl 1.0.2.
>> so
>> far this had the unpleasant implication that all new packages had to be
>>
sure, external mysql libs are not supported anymore but mysqlnd is. that has
been the default for years anyway.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:04:58 +0100, Friedrich Kink wrote:
> https://php.watch/versions/8.2/mysqli-libmysql-no-longer-supported
>
> Am 24.02.2024 um 18:43 schrieb Goetz T. Fischer:
>>
Hello all,
Another week another CoWorking Session coming up as always join us
tomorrow, Sunday 17:00 CET at
https://meet.chaostreffbern.ch/OpenIndianaCoWorkingSessions
Other friends of illumos also heartly welcome :)
-Till
___
oi-dev mailing list
On 2/24/24 10:23, Marcel Telka wrote:
in any case. probably more tricky is the system stuff like wpa.
The wpa package comes from illumos-gate. I'm not sure if it supports
newer OpenSSL than 1.0 out of the box. If not then it should be fixed
there. If it does, then maybe we need to adjust
On 2/24/24 09:27, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
having a peek at other repos shows that e.g. the solaris userland has sort of a
compromise solution. they do set the ssl version explicitly. however, their
package names only contain the major version like "openssl-3" and the same goes
for the install
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
> as you know there're still some packages in the repo that use openssl 1.0.2.
> so
> far this had the unpleasant implication that all new packages had to be
> hardcoded to newer ssl versions one way or the other, because
https://php.watch/versions/8.2/mysqli-libmysql-no-longer-supported
Am 24.02.2024 um 18:43 schrieb Goetz T. Fischer:
hello mr. fritzkink,
in regards to this
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2024-February/026815.html
and assuming you're on this list, just out of couriosity,
hello mr. fritzkink,
in regards to this
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2024-February/026815.html
and assuming you're on this list, just out of couriosity, why did you remove
mysqli.so from php-82 ?
--
R-A-C
Götz T. Fischer CertIT
+49(0)7225/98 98 79
g.fisc...@r-a-c.de
the list ...
ssl102_deps.xz
Description: Binary data
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
hey all,
as you know there're still some packages in the repo that use openssl 1.0.2. so
far this had the unpleasant implication that all new packages had to be
hardcoded to newer ssl versions one way or the other, because the buildsystem's
ssl mediator had to remain at 1.0.
obviously that
11 matches
Mail list logo
