On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 02:32:14AM +0100, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:23:33 +0100, Marcel Telka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
> >> as you know there're still some packages in the repo that use openssl
> >> 1.0.2.
> >>
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 17:22:16 +0100, Till Wegmueller wrote:
> 1. Old Packages with newer versions available in the repo.
> In this case this will be solved if/when we do the next repo cleanup.
> (You could also clean them out of your list, we can ignore those)
good.
> 2. Packages not being able
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 02:36:29AM +0100, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
> yes, going with 3.0 is the best choice. but i guess that ship has sailed for
> indiana already.
No, it didn't. If there is a PR with OpenSSL 3.0 addition then it would
get my full +1.
--
Hey Goetz
On 24.02.2024 18:27, Goetz T. Fischer wrote:
hey all,
as you know there're still some packages in the repo that use openssl 1.0.2. so
far this had the unpleasant implication that all new packages had to be
hardcoded to newer ssl versions one way or the other, because the
Hello Till!
Thanks for reminding!
From: Till Wegmueller
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 2:04 PM
To: openindiana-disc...@openindiana.org ;
oi-dev@openindiana.org
Subject: [oi-dev] CoWorking Session 25.02.2024
Hello all,
Another week another CoWorking Session
