Hello All,
When i add a record to a collection that is of type many 2 many the
following sql is executed
INSERT INTO m2m_196 (ruleValueListId,ruleValueId) VALUES (?,?) , the id
field is not specified in the query but the table has such a field and
therefore oracle complains about the fact that
Hi,
You're solution only seems to filter out the duplicates based on hashmap
logic, this of course only works when the method hashCode() has properly
been implemented. [And... does this suggested solution support the
paging (pagination) implementation?]
But more critical since the resultset
On 6/19/06, Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When i add a record to a collection that is of type many 2 many the
following sql is executed
INSERT INTO m2m_196 (ruleValueListId,ruleValueId) VALUES (?,?) , the id
field is not specified in the query but the table has such a field and
Thanks for the link Tom, that information was exactly what i was looking
for.
2006/6/19, Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/19/06, Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When i add a record to a collection that is of type many 2 many the
following sql is executed
INSERT INTO
Hi,
I found the following in OJB code:
For Version 1.0.4:
In class SqlSelectStatement in method protected String
buildStatement():
orderByFields = query.getOrderBy();
columnList = ensureColumns(orderByFields, columnList, stmt);
For Version 1.0 RC6 (which we are still using...
Hi,
Diving deeper into the OJB code I see that the ensureColumns method in
fact does two things:
(1) add the columns to the returnable set of columns in the resultset
(2) adds the columns to a list of columns to be used in force a join
(2) is okay for orderby's, but (1) is not. If for orderby's
On 6/19/06, Janssen, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diving deeper into the OJB code I see that the ensureColumns method in
fact does two things:
(1) add the columns to the returnable set of columns in the resultset
(2) adds the columns to a list of columns to be used in force a join
(2) is
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2006 22:26
Subject: Re: Bug : duplicate objects in resultset : Why add orderby
columns to resultset?
On 6/19/06, Janssen, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diving deeper into the OJB code I see that
