RE: [QUICKSTART] - A OJB quickstart similar to hibernate

2004-11-23 Thread Mitch Norby
All, This has been an interesting thread. I was tempted to rename it to, How to kill a good idea. :) First, I want to say that I think OJB is a great O/R framework and I really appreciate the careful thought, thorough design, and hard work that the contributors and related community have put

RE: Inheritance mapping, storing new object associated with pre-existingsuper object

2003-10-21 Thread Mitch Norby
I know it is possible when A and B1 are mapped to one table. Not sure about when they are mapped to two tables. I would hope both would work since the only difference is in the mapping layer. When they are mapped to one table... 1) Grab the A instance. 2) Create an instance of B1 and copy all

RE: Inheritance mapping, storing new object associated with pre-e xistingsuper object

2003-10-21 Thread Mitch Norby
Grosse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Inheritance mapping, storing new object associated with pre-e xistingsuper object On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:55:02 -0500, Mitch Norby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mitch, How would you model

RE: Optimistic Locking Problem

2003-09-09 Thread Mitch Norby
Never mind. Stupid user error. -Original Message- From: Mitch Norby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:49 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Optimistic Locking Problem We are using 1.0.rc4. It seems as though the optimistic locking attributes (integer