Hi everybody,
i have an important problem of performance.
I'd tried every type of object cache (default,empty,perBroker),
i instanciated a new PersistenceBroker instance each time i had a storing
sequence in my java Code, or I kept the same for all storing sequence.
I did it the same thing with
your
index takes more time.
cheers,
Ralf
ghielard [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 04.12.2003 15:23:45:
Hi everybody,
i have an important problem of performance.
I'd tried every type of object cache (default,empty,perBroker),
i instanciated a new PersistenceBroker instance each time i had a
storing
Hi everybody,
i have an important problem of performance.
I'd tried every type of object cache (default,empty,perBroker),
i instanciated a new PersistenceBroker instance each time i had a storing
sequence in my java Code, or I kept the same for all storing sequence.
I did it the same thing with
user
Siegfried Goeschl
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ghielard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. Dezember 2003 16:23
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: RE: Antwort: WHY OJB SPEND MORE AND MORE TIME TO STORE OBJECTS ?
There is no index in my database, only primary and foreign keys
I think if you put this line in your log4j.properties:
log4j.logger.org.apache.ojb.broker.cache.ObjectCacheFactory=WARN
CACHE STATISTICS logs won't be written any more.
-Message d'origine-
De : Dave Hodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : jeudi 4 decembre 2003 03:07
A : [EMAIL
unproxied references in repository.xml?
are you closing transactions properly?
Daniel.
- Original Message -
From: ghielard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: Antwort: WHY OJB SPEND MORE AND MORE TIME TO STORE OBJECTS
Hi everybody,
i've a problem of performance. OJB lasts more and more time to store objects
in my DataBase. I thougth it was due to objects but it steadily increases.
Is it a problem of memory (with java) or is it due to OJB ?
