Re: [ol-discuss] Making OL search default to ebooks and not all records. Thoughts?

I think that's a great idea even though I primarily use the site for research purposes. It should increase use of the collection as well. On Saturday, November 2, 2013, jessamyn c. west wrote: There's been some discussion at the Archive of ways to make Open Library a bit more usable to folks

Re: [ol-discuss] several suggestions

Great suggestions Andre! Though, I don't there is much active development happening with the Open Library project at this time. At least that's my impression from following the list for the past few years. IA is busy with other projects unfortunately. –Tod On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Andre

Re: [ol-discuss] Spam

+1 to Tom's recommendation. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 There seems to be a fair amount of spam on OpenLibrary.org's Recent Changes at the moment. I'm wondering if there are any plans to open up

Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 88, Issue 1

Colby, Let's jumpstart that movement by forking https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote: +1 On 6/7/15 8:25 AM, Colby Russell wrote: On 06/06/2015 09:32 AM, jessamyn c. west wrote: It's a thing that isn't built into the

Re: [ol-discuss] crud in ol data dumps

Yeah, this user stands up: https://openlibrary.org/people/market1 Not good. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Eric Hellman wrote: > Has anyone looked at the OL data dumps recently and can tell me how much > of them are spam? Looking at https://openlibrary.org/recentchanges