On 20 Mar 2015, at 10:30, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
19 марта 2015 г. 16:18:13 CET, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com пишет:
If you're runninng 006, 010, or 012 -- OpenSSL is now 1.0.1m.
If you're running bloody -- OpenSSL is now 1.0.2a. (NOTE: 1.0.2 is
affected more, so upgrade
19 марта 2015 г. 16:18:13 CET, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com пишет:
If you're runninng 006, 010, or 012 -- OpenSSL is now 1.0.1m.
If you're running bloody -- OpenSSL is now 1.0.2a. (NOTE: 1.0.2 is
affected more, so upgrade this quickly!)
All of the repos have been updated. Since this is
Hi,
OmniOS: SunOS nfsvmpool05 5.11 omnios-10b9c79 i86pc i386 i86pc (0.151012)
when trying to run zpool import, the command yields this output:
Assertion failed: rn-rn_nozpool == B_FALSE, file
../common/libzfs_import.c, line 1080, function zpool_open_func
Abort (core dumped)
I don't think
Joseph,
You can work around the too many drives problems by making the assumption
that you will never need to boot off of your external disks (the ones attached
to the SAS HBA's). Then you enter each SAS HBA's BIOS config manager, and
disable booting for that HBA. The motherboard BIOS will then
From: Andrew Gabriel
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:10 PM
Does anyone seriously use (or intend to use) 4.1 anymore?
The one and only thing I want out of NFSv4.1 is the protocol fix to the
exclusive open operation, which currently in NFSv4 results in broken
inherited ACLs :(.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, John D Groenveld wrote:
; In message alpine.gso.2.00.1503201937030.17...@areb.pvgehf-vg.arg, Andy
write
; s:
; This definitely looks like a driver problem but I'm making progress.
; It seems that the code for handling logical versus physical disks on an
; LSI Invader
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote:
I suppose a hacky script could get a list of all the libraries and
executables changed in the last update, use pfiles on all processes in all
zones to files which ones have those libraries open, then use svcs -p to
Does OmniOS support NFS v4.1? 4.1 support is a new feature in esxi v6, and I
was trying to set it up as described here:
http://wahlnetwork.com/2015/02/02/nfs-v4-1/
Things of course work fine if I use NFS v3, but if I try v4.1, I get a timeout
error when it tries to attach the data store.
On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Jeff Stockett jstock...@molalla.com wrote:
Does OmniOS support NFS v4.1? 4.1 support is a new feature in esxi v6, and I
was trying to set it up as described here:
http://wahlnetwork.com/2015/02/02/nfs-v4-1/
Things of course work fine if I use NFS v3,
Lustre is great for HPC. It lacks the sanctity of data that other
solutions have. It is getting there - using ZFS is a huge step
forward, but Lustre is by no means a general purpose solution at this
point.
Ian
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Gabriel
illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Chris Siebenmann c...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
We're running into a situation with one of our NFS ZFS fileservers[*]
where we're wondering if we have enough NFS server threads to handle
our load. Per 'sharectl get nfs', we have 'servers=512' configured,
but we're
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Andy wrote:
;
; On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, John D Groenveld wrote:
;
; ; Otherwise, good luck debugging MegaRAID drivers and firmware.
This definitely looks like a driver problem but I'm making progress.
It seems that the code for handling logical versus physical disks on an
LSI
Dan McDonald wrote:
On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Jeff Stockett jstock...@molalla.com wrote:
Does OmniOS support NFS v4.1? 4.1 support is a new feature in esxi v6, and I
was trying to set it up as described here:
http://wahlnetwork.com/2015/02/02/nfs-v4-1/
Things of course work fine if I
We're running into a situation with one of our NFS ZFS fileservers[*]
where we're wondering if we have enough NFS server threads to handle
our load. Per 'sharectl get nfs', we have 'servers=512' configured,
but we're not sure we know how to check how many are actually in use
and active at any
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:13:25 -0400
Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
We have NFS4.0 and earlier. We do not have NFS4.1. It would be a very
sizeable undertaking, requiring illumos community support. If anyone would
lead the charge on that, it'd be a storage-oriented firm, like
Chris Siebenmann wrote:
We're running into a situation with one of our NFS ZFS fileservers[*]
where we're wondering if we have enough NFS server threads to handle
our load. Per 'sharectl get nfs', we have 'servers=512' configured,
but we're not sure we know how to check how many are actually in
16 matches
Mail list logo
