Hey All,
I am debating the idea of just swapping all my hard drives in my current 8x2TB
RaidZ2 (all be it slowly) and let the environment resilver each drive than
expand versus creating a new RaidZ2 on a different box and cloning the data
over.
Obviously i know of the Pros/Cons/Risks
| I am debating the idea of just swapping all my hard drives in my
| current 8x2TB RaidZ2 (all be it slowly) and let the environment
| resilver each drive than expand versus creating a new RaidZ2 on a
| different box and cloning the data over.
|
| Obviously i know of the Pros/Cons/Risks associated
I know the drive itself does 512b emulation but i would rather run 4K if theres
a performance increase!
thanks
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Chris Siebenmann c...@cs.toronto.edu
To: Matthew Mabis mma...@vmware.com
Cc: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014
a zpool on one of our boxes has been degraded with several disks
faulted ...
* the disks are all sas direct attached
* according to smartctl the offending disks have no faults.
* zfs decided to fault the disks after the events below.
I have now told the pool to clear the errors and it is
| I know the drive itself does 512b emulation but i would rather run 4K
| if theres a performance increase!
What matters for OmniOS is what the drive reports as. If it reports
honestly that it has a 4k physical sector size, ZFS will say 'nope!'
even if the drive will accept 512b reads and
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
a zpool on one of our boxes has been degraded with several disks
faulted ...
* the disks are all sas direct attached
* according to smartctl the offending disks have no faults.
* zfs decided to fault the disks after the
Today Zach Malone wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@richardelling.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
a zpool on one of our boxes has been degraded with several disks
faulted ...
* the disks are all sas
On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Today Zach Malone wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@richardelling.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
a zpool on one of our boxes has been
Yesterday Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
[...]
it happened over time as you can see from the timestamps in the
log. The errors from zfs's point of view were 1 read and about 30 write
but according to smart the disks are
