Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX on OmniOS update

> On Aug 26, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:51:41 -0400 > Dan McDonald wrote: > >> - The "zoneadm -z install" script now can take a "-t " >> argument in lieu of a "-s ZFS-send-stream" argument. Both gzipped and full

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX on OmniOS update

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:51:41 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > - The "zoneadm -z install" script now can take a "-t " argument > in lieu of a "-s ZFS-send-stream" argument. Both gzipped and full will work. > Thanks to Peter Tribble for providing some URLs with tarballs that

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On Aug 14, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > > > - All network configuration can be done outside the zone giving the > > opportunity to hand out LX zones to users with a locked down

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Dan McDonald wrote: On Aug 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, wo...@4amlunch.net wrote: Also, regarding not being able to use Linux networking tools to configure things Is there a way we can pre-pend a "magic" $PATH entry that can't be removed that has all the tools (iptables,

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, wo...@4amlunch.net wrote: > > Also, regarding not being able to use Linux networking tools to configure > things Is there a way we can pre-pend a "magic" $PATH entry that can't be > removed that has all the tools (iptables, ifconfig, etc) that just print out

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> >> Approach 2) >> - This way favors in-house or friendly environment usecases where >> distributed responsibility is desired. >> - Greater flexibility for LX zone users > > > I see where you're going. "Doing both" requires double the work, but you do > make an interesting case for it. My

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 14, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 12:48:36 -0400 > Dan McDonald wrote: > >> >> I see pros & cons of both approaches. I'm visiting OmniTI HQ in a week to, >> among other things, bounce ideas around with OmniTI

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 12:48:36 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > > I see pros & cons of both approaches. I'm visiting OmniTI HQ in a week to, > among other things, bounce ideas around with OmniTI folks - since they are > also my customers. Feel free to speak up here if you have

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

In general, and I will have to make this EVEN CLEARER -- LX zones' networking is controlled by tools in /native. No iptables... I'm surprised the linux-native ifconfig(8) works, but that's likely due to some legacy ioctl support that's already in the LX brand kernel code. One open design

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

12 августа 2016 г. 19:14:29 CEST, Dan McDonald пишет: >Basically, you need to delegate the highres_clock permission to the >zone. Look for "proc_clock_highres" in your >/usr/lib/brand/lx/config.xml file. If it's not there, add the line per >the commit I indicated. > >Dan

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

12 августа 2016 г. 20:06:41 CEST, Michael Rasmussen пишет: >On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:32:02 +0200 >Jim Klimov wrote: > >> >> Michael, thanks for posting the script. There was a typo to fix >(un-tarring goes into ZONEPATH not ZONEPATH_DS, and a 'gtar' worked

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:32:02 +0200 Jim Klimov wrote: > > Michael, thanks for posting the script. There was a typo to fix (un-tarring > goes into ZONEPATH not ZONEPATH_DS, and a 'gtar' worked better for my > tarball). > Where in the code below do you see a ZONEPATH which

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Basically, you need to delegate the highres_clock permission to the zone. Look for "proc_clock_highres" in your /usr/lib/brand/lx/config.xml file. If it's not there, add the line per the commit I indicated. Dan ___ OmniOS-discuss mailing list

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

12 августа 2016 г. 17:46:29 CEST, Dan McDonald пишет: >Also, do you have this fix in place? > >commit f35040a7b2d3acea4f879afbc7ae4d8bfa09b575 >Author: Dan McDonald >Date: Mon Aug 8 17:17:31 2016 -0400 > >systemd kool-aid drinkers (e.g. Ubuntu 16) need

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Also, do you have this fix in place? commit f35040a7b2d3acea4f879afbc7ae4d8bfa09b575 Author: Dan McDonald Date: Mon Aug 8 17:17:31 2016 -0400 systemd kool-aid drinkers (e.g. Ubuntu 16) need proc_clock_highres privileges Dan

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

For relative-progress testing, make sure you compare your docker tarballs against a Joyent image of the same release. At least some of the boot errors are both in SmartOS boots of Joyent images (which they support and are at least okay enough with to support), and with the OmniOS version.

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

10 августа 2016 г. 1:20:19 CEST, Michael Rasmussen пишет: >On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:11:39 +0200 >Michael Rasmussen wrote: > >> I have taken the liberty to extend your script to handle gzipped >> tarballs of a root filesystem using the argument -t. With the stuff I

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

If I do anything like this, I will likely follow the SmartOS lead and use zonecfg(1M) properties to feed desired IP configurations into the zone's properties, which can then be handled by boot scripts, install scripts, or even lxinit or zoneadmd binaries. Dan

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:49:20 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Can't use Linux network configuration. Use /native/sbin/ipadm and > /native/sbin/route. (You will also need to add those to some sort of boot > script in-zone for now.) > > /native/sbin/ipadm

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, Dan McDonald wrote: Can't use Linux network configuration. Use /native/sbin/ipadm and /native/sbin/route. (You will also need to add those to some sort of boot script in-zone for now.) I think that any program using netlink and rtnetlink sockets (similar in operation

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Bob Friesenhahn > wrote: > > Illumos could provide an emulation of netlink sockets, but of course this > would be a lot of work. Oh gawd don't go there. Please. >From the lead author of PF_KEYv2, Dan

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Yeah - there's no "native apps storage" in LX zones currently. SmartOS gets around this by their zonecfg properties (set by vmadm) and runtime code. I'm not 100% sure how to solve this problem myself. I don't want to unravel the entire SmartOS sweater. Dan Sent from my iPhone (typos,

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:11:39 +0200 Michael Rasmussen wrote: > I have taken the liberty to extend your script to handle gzipped > tarballs of a root filesystem using the argument -t. With the stuff I > have added I was able to use the script to install a lxc prepared > tarball of

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:49:20 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Can't use Linux network configuration. Use /native/sbin/ipadm and > /native/sbin/route. (You will also need to add those to some sort of boot > script in-zone for now.) > > /native/sbin/ipadm create-addr -t -T

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:49:20 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Can't use Linux network configuration. Use /native/sbin/ipadm and > /native/sbin/route. (You will also need to add those to some sort of boot > script in-zone for now.) > > /native/sbin/ipadm create-addr -t -T

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Can't use Linux network configuration. Use /native/sbin/ipadm and /native/sbin/route. (You will also need to add those to some sort of boot script in-zone for now.) /native/sbin/ipadm create-addr -t -T static -a / lx0/v4 Dan ___

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:11:39 +0200 Michael Rasmussen wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:08:11 -0400 > Dan McDonald wrote: > > > Look in the script /usr/lib/brand/lx/lx_install to see what I mean. > > > Nice. > > I have taken the liberty to extend

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:08:11 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Look in the script /usr/lib/brand/lx/lx_install to see what I mean. > Nice. I have taken the liberty to extend your script to handle gzipped tarballs of a root filesystem using the argument -t. With the stuff I

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:45:03 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Is this a regression? Or it never worked? If the former, when was the last > media to work? If the latter, we should fix caiman or the .xml files we use > to feed it. > Not a regression but since this has been a

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:54:01 +0100 > Peter Tribble wrote: > >> >> All I did was replace the zfs bit in lx_install with >> > What 'zfs bit in lx_install' do you refer to? Look in the script

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:54:01 +0100 Peter Tribble wrote: > > All I did was replace the zfs bit in lx_install with > What 'zfs bit in lx_install' do you refer to? I would like to test a prebuild Debian tar.gz for LXC on Linux. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: > > Dan, > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > Not yet. Recommended course is to install bloody, then switch publishers to > the one I mentioned earlier. There are some fixes

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Dan, On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > Not yet. Recommended course is to install bloody, then switch publishers > to the one I mentioned earlier. There are some fixes for systemd images > not on the publisher yet. > > Please read the README for io-lx for

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:16:24 -0400 > Dan McDonald wrote: > >> Oh yes. All of my LX zone testing thus far has been on VMware fusion VMs on >> my laptop. >> > Latest Omnios Bloody does

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:16:24 -0400 Dan McDonald wrote: > Oh yes. All of my LX zone testing thus far has been on VMware fusion VMs on > my laptop. > Latest Omnios Bloody does not install on virtio-blk - installer cannot detect disk. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, "Stephan Budach" írta 2016-08-09 15:00-kor: > I'd love to be able to actually spend any time on this, but my workload > doesn't allow it??? I hope to get into this at the end of september. > Don't give up on it, please??? ;) +1 The same case here. I tried it the

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Not yet. Recommended course is to install bloody, then switch publishers to the one I mentioned earlier. There are some fixes for systemd images not on the publisher yet. Please read the README for io-lx for details on Installing an LX zone:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Oh yes. All of my LX zone testing thus far has been on VMware fusion VMs on my laptop. Dan Sent from my iPhone (typos, autocorrect, and all) > On Aug 9, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Tobi Oetiker wrote: > > hi dan > > great news ... a question ... for testing this, a vm would be

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, I'd love to be able to actually spend any time on this, but my workload doesn't allow it… I hope to get into this at the end of september. Don't give up on it, please… ;) Cheers, Stephan Am 09.08.16 um 10:05 schrieb Peter Tribble: Dan, I've not heard from anyone, so I'm going

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Dan, I've not heard from anyone, so I'm going to assume nobody has played with > LX zones on OmniOS yet. > Is there an ISO image to play with? -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ ___ OmniOS-discuss mailing

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

hi dan great news ... a question ... for testing this, a vm would be fine, right? cheers tobi Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch 062 775 9902 > On 09.08.2016, at 00:21, Dan McDonald wrote: > > I just pushed two commits to io-lx-public: > > commit

[OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

I just pushed two commits to io-lx-public: commit f35040a7b2d3acea4f879afbc7ae4d8bfa09b575 Author: Dan McDonald Date: Mon Aug 8 17:17:31 2016 -0400 systemd kool-aid drinkers (e.g. Ubuntu 16) need proc_clock_highres privileges commit

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX on OmniOS update

You are amazing. Keep up the great work. We love you!! I'll test this out as I have time. I'm very excited for this! -brian > On Jul 1, 2016, at 15:04, Dan McDonald wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm BCc:ing the illumos developer and illumos discussion lists. This thread > should

[OmniOS-discuss] LX on OmniOS update

Hello! I'm BCc:ing the illumos developer and illumos discussion lists. This thread should continue on omnios-discuss. Please note I will be very slow to get back to emails until July 12th. I'd like to report some progress on the LX zones for OmniOS work. First some URLs. The git repos are: