Hello,
Matthias Huetsch wrote on 2011-07-07 19.43:
Well, as I explained in direct reply to Rob, upstream projects are
already included in securityt...@openoffice.org. This includes members
of the LibreOffice team. Also, a member of the OpenOffice.org Security
Team is subscribed to the
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 19:38, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
I converted the questions into headers. I don't think that is
required. We could take a more narrative approach if we wanted.
Speaking as a Director who reviews these things... the header approach
is *way* better than a
Thank you for putting together you first board report [1]
I've taken a look at it and find it is acceptable in its current form.
However, I do have a couple of comments (as you get to know me more I
nearly always have a couple of comments)
Incubator reports and TLP board reports are slightly
Hello,
luizh...@gmail.com wrote on 2011-07-08 01.48:
list in Brazil [2]. But, this week someone from the list of TDF did not like
these referrals. Then I ask if we can start thinking about structuring an
OOo users list in Brazilian portuguese.
I guess I have to clarify this topic a bit (and
Hi Ross,
Le 8 juil. 11 à 00:41, Ross Gardler a écrit :
I'm not sure to fully understand. Can you explain more please ?
Sure.
When typing my email about encouraging the project to offer easy
tasks with mentors it occurred to me that the education project
may already have some efforts to
Am 07.07.2011 19:29, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
On 07.07.2011 18:06, Ian Lynch wrote:
-stuff removed that can be read one news back -
Just to prevent that a false impression comes up (and the 2 meg you
named gets a meaning that it doesn't have in fact): the code cleanup
in LO we are
On 07.07.2011 20:33, Greg Stein wrote:
I've been trying to focus us on the scripts so that all of us can experiment.
I'll get them updated for OOO340 as a base, build a single Hg, and
publish that (as a bundle) on people.apache.org for others to review.
Of course, you can also review the
On 08.07.2011 13:17, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 08.07.2011 12:50, Armin Le Grand wrote:
I just want to mention that with the variable cleanup in OOo I
had 1010 conflicting files on aw080 on the next resync, in
average with 4-5 conflicts due
This all sounds wonderful. The ComDev project here simply pushes
people to the projects themselves. We don't provide specific mentors,
we just try and encourage people to take that first step by giving
some gentle guidance on what the first step should be.
The EducOOo project is much more
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:48 PM, luizh...@gmail.com luizh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Brazilian community [1] still maintains a minimum structure of support
to users of OOo/Libo. I forwarded the questions that come to help single
list in Brazil [2]. But, this week someone from the list of TDF
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission?
I'm interesting in knowing how many people are currently subscribed,
especially a sense of the ratio of lurkers to active participants,
contributors to users, etc. This could be one indication
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission?
On another thread and list I saw this:
Email ooo-dev-help@ from your
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission?
On another thread and list I saw this:
Email ooo-dev-help@ from your
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please excuse typos
Am 08.07.2011 16:41 schrieb Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list
Hi,
2011/7/8 Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:48 PM, luizh...@gmail.com luizh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The Brazilian community [1] still maintains a minimum structure of
support
to users of OOo/Libo. I forwarded the questions that come to help single
list in
Hi Dave, *,
did you check all the other (not US/UK) user ML as well?
IMHO we need a statement for all the current subscribers on the actual user
MLs. You can hardly regain customers you lost.
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please excuse typos
Am 08.07.2011 15:53 schrieb Dave Fisher
Hi Manfred,
did you check all the other (not US/UK) user ML as well?
No, I did it mostly out of curiosity. Although I speak multiple computer
languages, my human language skills are English with a little high school
German over 30 years ago.
If others know
IMHO we need a statement for
I'm working on fetching all the Hg repositories and wanted to come
back to the l10n stuff. We need to include that in our migration
(correct me, if I'm wrong).
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 09:37, Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 02.07.2011 04:14, Greg Stein wrote:
...
I used that code to
I left the Community section empty on my last clean-up, but I promised to add
something today. When I do may last stats for how we are doing in a little
while, I will indicate a brief summary on what we have accomplished in having
folks on-board.
Although it is tempting to talk about what
For balance, I recommend lurking on [libreoffice-users] and
[libreoffice-documentation]. The developers list (counterpart of ooo-dev,
right down to patch pushing), [libreoffice] is part of a separate system. This
list is useful, especially for the tech steering committee minutes, and it may
Kay's questions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation
have helped me focus on how to enable website contributions.
I really like the Apache CMS. Here is possible a workflow that would allow
non-committers to be able to contribute patches to both
-Original Message-
From: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob
Weir
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 12:41 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 6:06 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
+1:
- introduce an AOOo blog so that the Community can follow our progress.
Ok, so
Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 6:06 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
+1:
- introduce an AOOo blog so that the Community can follow our
On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 6:06 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
+1:
- introduce an AOOo blog so
Doesn't the dropping of the .org imply renaming the product not just the
project? The name of the product is OpenOffice.org because the name
OpenOffice was registered elsewhere. If the new name was 'Apache
OpenOffice' would that be different enough from the other OpenOffice (a
company inthe
And I'm willing to publish but not that keen on admin.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 14:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ooo blog (was: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?)
On Jul 8, 2011, at
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
AFAIK we have not yet decided if we want to remove the .org extension or
keep like it was in the old project.
Right. Apache OpenOffice might be unique enough from a trademark
perspective, if taken as a whole. I thought
Am 07/09/2011 12:05 AM, schrieb David McKay:
Doesn't the dropping of the .org imply renaming the product not just the
project? The name of the product is OpenOffice.org because the name
OpenOffice was registered elsewhere. If the new name was 'Apache
OpenOffice' would that be different enough
-Original Message-
From: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob
Weir
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 8:14 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ooo blog (was: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?)
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Marcus (OOo)
It isn't just a matter of who gets more hits on Google. In 2000, the OpenOffice
name was not trademarkable worldwide (and probably still is not) without the
.org. OTOH, the ASF doesn't normally seek to register all it's trademarks
worldwide because of cost (in the US, first use of a mark is
Then the choices are:
blogs.apache.org/openofficeorg
or
blogs.apache.org/ooo
The title ought to be Apache OpenOffice.org (incubating), correct?
Regards,
Dave
On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
It isn't just a matter of who gets more hits on Google. In 2000, the
OpenOffice
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 8:29 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ooo blog
Am 07/09/2011 12:05 AM, schrieb David McKay:
Doesn't the dropping of the .org imply renaming the product not just
the
On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 8:29 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ooo blog
Am 07/09/2011 12:05 AM, schrieb David McKay:
Doesn't the dropping
I don't understand this part:
* Note invitations must be to existing blog accounts,
and blog accounts are
created by Infra (mainly me) and are not
LDAP aware at this stage.
I take it you would like to batch the account setup. Do you want to start a
clock on the first signups? Say 72
CURRENT PPMC STATUS:
BRINGING INITIAL COMMITTERS ON-BOARD
In the past week, we moved from 50 committers to 56, from 31 PPMC to 38.
We are awaiting 24 iCLA, down from 27. We are waiting for 5 initial committers
to choose a preferred Apache user name/ID, and we have one
I think a summary will help. The following needs to be done to configure an
Apache Blog which runs on Apache Roller.
(1) The blog name - narrowed to either blogs.apache.org/openofficeorg ir
blogs.apache.org/ooo
(2) The title of the blog - Apache OpenOffice.org (incubating)
(3) The list of
Dave Fisher wrote:
Yes. When I volunteer to admin, but not publish, I am saying that I am not
going to be a blogger (if I can avoid it.) I would only correct obvious
errors and omissions. There should be at least one other admin as well.
I will offer to assist Dave with the admin part. I
On Jul 8, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Kay's questions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation
have helped me focus on how to enable website contributions.
I really like the Apache CMS. Here is possible a workflow that would allow
Hi all,
I borrowed some space on some ASF equipment and used the
'fetch-all-cws.sh' script to pull down all of the CWS repositories (in
addition to the OOO340 and master_l10n/OOO340 repositories). This
consumed 77 Gb of disk space.
The fetch-all-cws.sh script has been updated with all my fixes
40 matches
Mail list logo
