Rob Weir wrote:
Much clipped to save space.
Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they
are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any
official relationship to the project.
If you look on the support page at OOo you will find the oooforum
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Much clipped to save space.
Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they
are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any
official
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 01:24:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64
Applications run, smoketest is good.
Same for --enable-dbgutil unxlngx6
One thing that caught my eye because I usually set macro security to
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Monday, 2011-08-29 18:08:01 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Do we have a wiki page that shows a non-programmer to build AOOo?
Also a list of needed programs would be really helpful, Windows7 and
Ubuntu 11.04 here. I would like to help and think this is something
I can
Donald Whytock wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
But again, objections must be from committers, backed with
technical arguments and the willingness to implement alternatives.
The Apache voting policy page you linked agrees that binding votes are
from
Matt Richards wrote:
Greetings,
I have been using OOo for quite some time (its been my fall back if I'm not
able to use Microsoft's suite [mostly on Linux and Mac]) and am very pleased
seeing it become an Apache project. While, I've not really been part of the
OOo community until I heard it has
Thanks for doing this for us.
Mark Thomas wrote:
3. All usernames and passwords remain unchanged with one exception:
users with system administration rights have been removed from the admin
group. Access to this group will be limited to members of the ASF
infrastructure team (new volunteers
TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/25/2011 19:24, Andy Brown wrote:
Thanks for doing this for us.
Mark Thomas wrote:
3. All usernames and passwords remain unchanged with one exception:
users with system administration rights have been removed from the admin
group. Access to this group will be limited
Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Starting a new thread so that there is no confusion.
You removed all links to an existing us...@openoffice.org from the
mail_list.html. (I like the ooo-dev part of what you did.)
Please return these links to the page until the time we create ooo-users@i.a.o.
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
1) Initially, only changes are made to make SVN to more perfectly
match the Hg tip. We know there are 10 or so files that need to be
checked in, with attention to EOL style. And there was a suggestion
to update the memo of
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
snip
At the end it seems the best solution is still to go 2 ways: ML and forum.
Best in what way? If half of us want pizza for dinner, and the other
half want sushi, is the best solution to have
http://studio-no.net/openoffice.php seems to be selling OOo, not illegal
I know. Is this something like PortableApps?
Andy
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Let me try:
- I've downloaded the file without that someone wanted to have money or
a registration from me.
- The mirror http://mirrors.fe.up.pt/; where the download comes from is
an officoal mirror of the (old) OOo project.
- The MD5 sum is exactly the same as if you
Jean Weber wrote:
Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both
places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other.
Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences vary
with whether I'm a consumer or a provider of
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Thanks for watching out.
Is what I do. :)
Maybe there is a dependency from where, how, etc. you try to download.
However, it doesn't seen to be a general thing.
I did not think of that. I downloaded the file from their link and
looks like the right size for the
Gavin McDonald wrote:
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Maybe, but they are still not subscribed. So the moderator has to let the
posts through; again and again until the user is subscribed.
ew,, no that does not have to happen at all.
the moderator can do a reply-all ,
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-08-23 7:28 PM Andy Brown wrote:
The OOo user and discuss list use to have the Delivered-to contain
moderator and it was easy to see when a message was from a person
that was not subscribed to the list, the way that Apache does it. When
the mail system changed
Terry Ellison wrote:
I've now finished the upgrade to add the Apache Traffic Server front end
to the community MediaWiki service at http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/ and
the service is back online.
We need to do some further tuning of the system cache optimisation, but
even with the first-cut
Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an address is active' then it should be maintained
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
Andy
TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the OOo site [1]
or [2]. If not then post a message to the list that your on.
[1]
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing
Dave Fisher wrote:
The changes are good at showing where we are as developers.
The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list
with several posts in a day and the change is hiding that list.
Until there is ooo-users@i.a.o we shouldn't hide users@ooo.
Does anyone
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-08-22 5:09 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/23/2011 12:50 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
And why should we accept newsgroup posts the same as posts from subscribers to
this list? This list is not a newsgroup, but the gmane newsgroup creates the
effect of subscribers without they're being subscribed here.
Why should we be interested in that? Especially
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an address is active' then it should be maintained for
that user as that is where some contacts expect to find that
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've updated the text on http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html;
(with borrowed text from Mathias).
Marcus
I like it. :)
Andy
Rob Weir wrote:
As my preceding forwards indicate, we're getting some interesting
posts to d...@openoffice.org, including offers of help, but they are
not getting adequate responses. We're missing opportunities here to
grow the project.
Is there anything we can do to improve this?
1) Continue
Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Friday, 2011-08-19 06:37:49 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
I liked the one reply that was sent to someone offering to help:
[...]
If no one objects I will monitor the list and reply with something
like the above and point people to the AOOo with page.
That's
Dave Fisher wrote:
Some have no dns or the DNS is non-functional
openoffice2009.com
openoffice-gratuit.com
openoffice-pt.com
openoffice-pl.com
openoffice-nl.com
openoffice-fr.com
openoffice09fr.com
Have these Authoritative servers.
NS63.1AND1.ES
NS64.1AND1.ES
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:27:29 +0200, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Am 15.08.2011 21:13, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weirapa...@robweir.com wrote:
[..]
ooo/trunk/core --- all the OOO340 stuff
ooo/trunk/l10n -- all the language
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
specifically to take this over, and then working with
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.comwrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of
Simon Phipps wrote:
I don't follow that reasoning. If (hypothetically) I want to pay for you to
go to Bermuda for a vacation, it's between you and me and no business of the
Bermuda Tourist Commission. So while I can see the hardware donations will
have to end, why is it anything to do with
genevieve Berthault wrote:
Hello! I would like to subscribe to this mailing list please.
All the best,
Genny
You will have to subscribe yourself. Go to
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html and click
the link.
Just so that your
Thanks for the work, Dave.
Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
Progress.
On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I was able to get HTML wrapped using the Apache CMS last night. I'm not ready
to commit anything yet. I'll summarize where I am
Joe Schaefer wrote:
All: stop talking on this thread. This juvenile conversation
needs to end, and we need to get back to making progress on
both the service migration and the source code repository.
Re service migration: the people who currently admin the existing
wiki would be welcome to
Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
Gav, the Admin from the ASF has setup the VM for the MediaWiki. It's a
Ubuntu 10.4.3 LTS VM. At the Moment Gav and I has admin access to this
machine. First we have to install all the needed software, Then we will
make a test migration with a older Dump, then we
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to
change a bit, how to recognize the language, OS and country to
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/03/2011 04:54 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has
). This is going way over the edge past
JFDI and/or lazy consensus.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Brown [mailto:a...@the-martin-byrd.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 09:00
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was
re:OpenOffice.org
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
If you talking the wiki, instead of requiring an ICLA as a person has to
create an account, why not make it part of that process that All submitted
contributions are under AL2 license. Would that not
Rob Weir wrote:
I poked around and found this page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
Good find.
This lists some additional roles (with counts)
Administrators (26)
Bureaucrats (4)
Editors (20)
Reviewers (5)
Those are in addition to 35,020 User accounts.
Danese Cooper wrote:
Well, after a policy is decided on, I'd suggest we publish it along with a
request for permission link that goes to a special list in this PPMC of
people willing to moderate the OOo trademark policy. That's how OSI,
Mozilla, Wikimedia and a few other projects I can think
Shane Curcuru wrote:
Thanks for the info. Note that it would be helpful if people interested
in working with trademarks read the Apache policies, as well as our
growing list of FAQs:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/
Part of my
imacat wrote:
Dear all,
I welcome the contribution from the Symphony team. But before the
Symphony contribution, shouldn't it be the first task to move the source
onto Apache SVN or something, instead of the current mercurial hg? Not
only IBM would like to contribute back to
David McKay wrote:
On 18/07/11 20:50, Andy Brown wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 18.07.2011 20:21, Mathias Bauer wrote:
1) xpdf (GPL'd) is a run dependency, this is linux/unix
specific. PDFBox may be a replacement.
This component is used for the pdf import extension, not for OOo
itself
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
FWIW;
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Andy Brown wrote:
...
I agree with you that it is the expectations that cause the
real problem. For me it is a waste as it does not do as
most people expect. An OCR import would be a better option,
if we can find one.
I haven't
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/18/2011 10:04 PM, schrieb David McKay:
On 18/07/11 20:50, Andy Brown wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 18.07.2011 20:21, Mathias Bauer wrote:
1) xpdf (GPL'd) is a run dependency, this is linux/unix
specific. PDFBox may be a replacement.
This component is used
Wolf Halton wrote:
What do I have to do to get in the PPMC?
-Wolf Halton
Your listed as one but not joined the mailing list yet. See
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html . Your name and
id are there. You should have received an email with the link to join
the ooo-private
eric b wrote:
I meant, when we compare :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html (1) with
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal (2)
We retrieve people in (1) who did not sign the ICLA as stated in (1).
But maybe the list on the wiki is not up to date ...
Dave Fisher wrote:
Sorry, but this is a better thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTi=gBok7Q0bCfVzwxh+FZTw-o=a...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I agree Dave. It was interesting watching this unfold and see how
things work. I stayed connected to the
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:43:10 +0100, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
...
As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the Document
Is the intent to host all of the extensions currently at the OOo site?
Or a subset? Or a different set?
They
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 07/11/2011 04:06 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 11:12 +0100, David McKay wrote:
snip
On 09/07/11 07:58, eric b wrote:
The .org is and was always essential to the community.
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to me, no
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Dang!
Well, I just jumped right in.
So, we want the blog to be the official voice of the project in some way?
Is that a requirement? Is that what we want? I thought that is what web
sites are for. Blogs have a different kind of voice in my experience.
Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 6:06 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
+1:
- introduce an AOOo blog so that the Community can follow our
Dave Fisher wrote:
Yes. When I volunteer to admin, but not publish, I am saying that I am not
going to be a blogger (if I can avoid it.) I would only correct obvious
errors and omissions. There should be at least one other admin as well.
I will offer to assist Dave with the admin part. I
Simon Phipps wrote:
It's certainly worth asking, although I believe their current LGPLv3+MPL
policy is more a suggestion than a requirement so it would ultimately be up
to each contributor. Perhaps you could ask on the steering-discuss list[1]?
S.
[1]
Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to participate in the OOo project.
I'm a programmer and documentation editor.
Ted
A person does not request an id. Anyone can contribute to OOo by
sending patches to code or the web sites to this list. When the
committers see the patches they include them in
imacat wrote:
Dear all,
I'm wondering, is the OOo source on the Apache svn now? If not,
will it be moved onto the Apache svn? I would like to check some of the
old issues reported from our local community. I guess working on the hg
source is not a good idea.
The actual source code
Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 14:27, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
...
I think the first Apache release it will be a good
opportunity to do all the big API/ABI changes, including
this. I think we should also use lucene 3.2, etc..
For my own education... what API
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
Sorry for jumping in but it seems there is an missunderstading between Rob
and the ODFAuthor project. I think the ODFAuthor was in the position of many
quasi-independent groups like the OOo NGOs
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
It might help to be explicit about what you want to do with the user
guides. Are you:
1) Looking to have a link from the Apache OOo web site to the user guides?
2) Having the publication form of the user guides
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
It might help
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
I like the idea of using ODF, for the reasons you state.
I assuming this implies ODF files in the SVN repository. If so, we're
going to have three pain points:
1) Since ODF
Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi at all
For preparation of the big migration we plane to make same thing similar
as http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home unfortunaly we
have three space for it atm. We should reduce them to one.
Wolf Halton wrote:
Why not have it be an actual wiki page with option to download pdf?
I hate odds when I am reading sites from the droid. :-)
I am willing to give it a try if someone can point me to instructions on
what to do.
Excuse my lack of knowledge, but what is odds?
Andy
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Wolf Halton wrote:
Why not have it be an actual wiki page with option to download pdf?
I hate odds when I am reading sites from the droid. :-)
I am willing to give it a try if someone can point me to instructions on
what
Rob Weir wrote:
Does anyone see a difference other than the obvious difference of
technology, between the OOo user list and the forums? Are they being
used for different kinds of things? Or are they just different ways
of doing the same things?
-Rob
There is a big difference from the
Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
There is a big difference from the users stand point. If you want to
see how hot this topic can get go to [1] and search for forum . As
an individual I prefer mailing list but I understand why some
Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi all,
I am translating http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
into Japanese.
:)
I have just come up to Initial Source.
--
Initial Source
The initial source will consist of a collection of
Dave Fisher wrote:
In light of this conversation I am changing the proposal to this:
For both the Community Forum (OOOUSER) and the Developer Forum (OOODEV) I now
propose sending an email with a daily digest to ooo-commits@incubator.a.o.
This way those who want to oversee changes can do
Hi All,
I am working on a how to be put on the User wiki site and have a
question on the license wording, how much is required? Would This
document is released under AL2 license. be proper? Or do I need to
copy the entire license?
TIA
Andy
the Apache license
as well, and may apply it in their own way(s), so you may have seen
other styles of NOTICES and the like elsewhere.
Separately, there is an Apache RAT (Release Audit Tool) podling:
http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
- Shane
On 6/23/2011 8:09 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Hi
Tool) podling:
http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
- Shane
On 6/23/2011 8:09 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Hi All,
I am working on a how to be put on the User wiki site and have a
question on the license wording, how much is required? Would This
document is released under AL2 license. be proper
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
I personally would prefer not to receive them.
Please make sure they are easy to filter: some
header like [Wiki digest] ..., at least.
cheers,
Pedro.
Agreed.
Andy
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 6/21/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
From: Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
...
On 21 Jun 2011, at 15:13, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
I opt for dropping OS/2 support completely.
I agree, but it would still be better to get that code
under AL
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
service with how Apache projects work.
Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
representing the
Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi All,
I was curious about both the OpenOffice.org User Registration and the Oracle
Improvement Program. Is this something that Oracle is willing to share? If only
snapshots.
(1) At some point we'll need to ask Oracle to redirect registrations.
(2) Is there any interest
Hi Ross,
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
I have seen references to user facing web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It is an very useful user
facing
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
I have seen references to user facing web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
I have seen references to user facing web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It is an very useful
user facing asset that I would hate to see lost. If it is transfered
what will be require from those that
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:30 +0200, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2011 05:00 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
[...]
As far as I'm concerned that would be fine for dmake. I never liked to
have it in the OOo code base and I know that others
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I've been away for the past 2 weeks, so I've missed all the happenings.
I'm now catching up on the list archives and hope to be confirmed soon
as a committer. Meanwhile, I thought I would introduce myself, because
I've seen several topics where I think I can contribute
Greg Stein wrote:
I wanted to raise this query to the surface for input: the name in the
repository. This is easily changed, so it's really just about ongoing
perception.
* I used ooo to match the mailing list names and to keep URLs short
* Christian used openofficeorg to match some podling
87 matches
Mail list logo
