It appears that all three forms are correct as notations for the same numerical
value where . is recognized as a decimal point.
I agree that there should be consistency.
I think context of the numeral is important. In particular, which is most
likely to be easily recognized and understood
changed it to ,
Would it be possible to have a macro or something for . so it appears in
, for me . signals 1000 (1.000)
Jan.
On 3 November 2012 18:29, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
It appears that all three forms are correct as notations for the same
numerical value where
Because of the substitution of LibreOffice as openoffice.org installs, it is
very confusing which of these defects may apply to Apache OpenOffice.
In any case, the Debian CVE is now public.
-Original Message-
From: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk
@Rory,
I agree about Kindle. A Kindle Fire has more functionality and all of the UI
capabilities one expects of an Android device, whereas the Kindle Readers have
a different, special-purpose application.
I see Rob has provided a comprehensive statement later on this thread. I would
add
Message-
From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 00:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] difficulty field for Bugzilla
On 24.10.2012 22:28, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
@Regina,
Yes, Wizard is a reference to the level of mastery
@Regina,
Yes, Wizard is a reference to the level of mastery that a solver must
possess, and is one of those which one of these words does not belong
solutions.
There is a well-known *logarithmic* difficulty scale that has been used
over 40 years for problem difficulty. It might be worth
+1 Great question
I think severity has to do with the significance to the reporter. It is
generally not for the resolver to deal with.
Difficulty is an assessment about the effort/skill required to resolve the
(confirmed) issue. The cause may be deep and the resolution deeper.
-Original
Hi!
It is important to remember that XML was a disruption of SGML, not HTML.
I don't understand your list, below. RELAX NG compact syntax and N3 are
special purpose formats, not markup languages. CSS is also a special purpose
format. And JSON too.
They have particular values in special
, but according to Windows Task
Manager, it isn't.
Suggestions?
Maurice D. Howe
General MacArthur Honor Guard Assn
616 Lacey Drive
Endwell, NY 13760
607-754-0469
maur...@stny.rr.com
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10
it again and closing it immediately to see if that clears it
up.
I have not tried running it on Outlook (2010 in my case). I'll see if I can
reproduce the experience of Maurice Howe now.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday
if that is a factor.
I stopped the recorder successfully.
I am changing this message back to plaintext.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 09:38
To: ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org; ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
I had no idea there was this handy tool. It should help with demonstrations
of problems in AOO:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/HelpYourUsersRecordAndReportBugsWithTheProblemStepsRecorder.aspx
- Dennis
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
[ ... ]
I nose around in the Symphony code from time to time and I notice there is
no reflection of the grant and availability under ALv2 has occurred.
We were notified that the grant was received.
Is it expected
:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 3:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
The proposed PMC chair is not an officer of the PPMC
.]
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 09:14
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Besides the concerns
I don't think deleting the files of the Symphony contribution is a constructive
step.
Cleaning up the IPR will work for everyone.
When can the ASF expect the letter from IBM that you have offered to request?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
The proposed PMC chair is not an officer of the PPMC. The PPMC has no chair.
I suppose the updated graduation resolution would need to be balloted here.
Then the IPMC can vote on it on their list for graduation.
Also, all of the things that a PPMC is supposed to have been done need to be
-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 08:00
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation
The proposed PMC chair is not an officer of the PPMC. The PPMC has no chair.
I suppose the updated graduation
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Chen Peng, pengch@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
I think the OP is asking about printed forms, as on a bumper sticker. Since
they are presumably enlarged, the provision of trademark information in small
but readable type at/around the margin would probably work.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com
I don't understand what problem it is expected that use of HTML will solve.
Are you suggesting that HTML[5] can become a common/universal interchange
format.
Do you consider ePub a candidate?
Note that even using Webkit as a common support for presentation of documents
to users does not
My impression is that the student is requesting travel assistance, not
admission assistance.
Catriona, will you be more specific about what you are requesting and the
amount involved. There is an application form that Oliver can provide
information about.
- Dennis
-Original
Shortly after the publication of ODF 1.0, there were claims by some that ODF
was a universal format and that MSFT should simply adopt it, because as a
universal format, ODF can certainly carry anything that Microsoft Office then
carried in its binary formats. This was also a factor in the
[X] Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 16:42
To: ooo-dev
Subject: [VOTE][PMC] PMC Chair
[ ... ][
[ ] Drew Jensen (atjensen)
The [DISCUSS] for this vote can be found at [2] and [3]. Note:
I don't understand.
Microsoft began supporting ODF 1.0 in Office 2007 (SP2 I think).
They also support ODF 1.0 in Office 2010.
In Office 2013/365 there is support for ODF 1.2, including with support of
OpenFormula in Excel.
There are now three ways to consider interoperability among Office
I notice that Apache Forrest does use the Apache feather: there are three of
them stood on their quills as if they are a small stand of trees.
It seems to me that the incorporation of the feather can be a little strained.
The cases where it is in shadow, on the other hand, are easy to
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Dong Jun Zong, zongdj@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
[ X ] +1 approve
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 15:38
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache
by Apache)
0 authz (permissions to OOO SVN to be set)
18 PPMC? (eligible but not participating on PPMC)
112 complete
33 other
263 TOTAL
- Dennis, for the Apache OpenOffice PPMC
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 02
This article provides a forward-looking account of opportunities for Apache
OpenOffice work:
http://www.zdnet.com/apache-openoffice-libreoffice-aim-for-office-2013-cloud-support-in-13-14-704975/
There is mention of an openoffice.org blog (without any link). I am not
certain what is being
OK, you got me ...
Umm, if the third party puts up an AOO-supplied logo, I don't think one can
learn anything at AOO other than whether or not there are page views that pull
the resource from the AOO location. It gets a little messy to track those.
If there is a third-party page or image (or
My recommendation:
48-hour steps are too short. Take at least 72 minimums, state fixed UTC
earliest-end date-times (so no one has to figure out when from now is), and
maybe skip over weekend days.
There's no rush.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist
Oh.
I thought it was *not* the practice of ASF to claim copyright over code. It is
always weird to say all rights reserved and simultaneously offer a license.
Is it necessary to include a copyright notice in the About box at all? ASF has
no copyright on any of the source code. Where is
Right you are.
I have no further concerns.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:59
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: LICENSE text in the user interface
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Dennis E
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Linyi Li, liliny@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Chen ZuoJun, zjchen@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
+1 on JFDI (though declare yourself to wrap-up the [User Docs] thread.
+1 on Project Blog post
and have fun
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:21
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re:
There is a limited web development tool built into OpenOffice.
It is called Writer/Web.
You can see it in action by
1. Opening an HTML file in Writer, or
2. On the Apache OpenOffice Start Page,
Choose Templates | New Document | HTML Document,
or
3. Start a Writer document and save
Hey, let's get review of that document. I didn't realized it had been updated
beyond being a placeholder for the needed document.
Where is it found on the ODFAUthors repository?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday,
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 17:41
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Chen ZuoJun
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Chen ZuoJun, zjchen
on Project Status Page (was RE: New committer:
Chen ZuoJun)
On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Rob,
I recently took a look at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html to see if I could
derive that list from the Roster.
What gave me pause
I am not clear what the lazy consensus is about.
Clearly, there is no restriction on anyone contributing to User Guides for
Apache OpenOffice on ODFAUthors, beyond the terms/conventions/what-ever that
apply to contributions there.
So I suppose what is being asked for is consensus that there
Rob,
I agree, there is no reason to turn away new contributions brought to the
project by their contributors.
I agree, the lazy consensus on this one is odd.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 14:18
To:
Just for clarification, please.
When you say voting is secret for ASF members and Board members, that there is
a way to ensure only eligible voters cast at most one ballot, but the voters
are not identified? That is, it is not known who voted and what their vote was?
That is generally what is
Dave, I'm puzzled.
I thought this thread and the one on which nominations are being made was at
the initiative of Andrew Rist.
Are you and he collaborating on compilation of the results?
It would be great if there was a single compilation of the results, it could be
verified by anyone, and
-1
This procedure lacks transparency and accountability. It is incompatible with
how project governance is accomplished.
My recommendation is that those who have some reason to require anonymity with
regard to their nominations (that is what it is, individuals are asked to make
10
Did you mean to do this on the [PMC] Proposed PMC List thread, not the
[DISCUSS] thread?
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynch [mailto:ianrly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 09:22
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed PMC List
Ok, Andrew
Download of Apache OpenOffice 3.4
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
[ ... ]
6. Amazon has a Games and Software Library for users. This can be used to
re-download the software and also get product keys (not applicable for this
one). Out of curiosity
Download of Apache OpenOffice 3.4
On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
8. Going through the one-click purchase of the $0.00 software, I was not sent
the executable. Instead, I was sent an Amazon OpenOffice 34 by Apache
downloader executable. I ran it. It is a simple
: What is a good Project Management Committee?
2012/9/16 Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
I have no position on how the PMC is established. I have no skin in the
game. I do expect that the manner of selection might need to be a
demonstration that this project is self-governing
If, as Keith proposes, the work is conducted at the ODFAUthors site and the
ODFAuthors licensing is retained, the question then becomes simply whether
redistribution on a site in ASF custody is appropriate.
That seems simplest and appropriate. Even if there is a concern about the
dual-license
It is my understanding that the openoffice.org web site content is not a
subject of the Oracle grant. Although the ASF now has custody of the domains,
there is no content grant.
The explicit licenses on content there continue to apply.
My personal preference would be to continue on ODF
Concerning the use of a boiler-plate rejection message:
I have a concern about forcing users who may already be distressed and agitated
to start over. Also there are no support channels in the sense that most
users will understand that.
As I recall, the reject message that is produced by the
...@msn.com was listed as
subscribed. Trying again.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 07:57
To: OOo-private Apache Incubator
Subject: PLEASE REJECT THIS MESSAGE
This is a test request form an unsubscribed user. It is being
On learning that Amazon.com is offering downloads of Apache OpenOffice, I was
curious enough to go through the purchase ($0.00) and download process at
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008XAXAC4/.
Here's everything I noticed:
1. OOPS #1: It says the product is for Vista / XP, with no other
I have no position on how the PMC is established. I have no skin in the game.
I do expect that the manner of selection might need to be a demonstration that
this project is self-governing and that it fosters community.
I have no problem with whatever size PMC is chosen.
I am, nevertheless,
Committee?
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
[ ... ]
I am, nevertheless, uncomfortable with the suggestion that the current PPMC
can't be considered as having the trust of the community. I see no
evidence of that.
You might review the discussions
Thanks, TJ.
That is a great point. That can be done with our lists, too.
The only ones I reported, with considerable difficulty, were Linked In
connection requests sent to ooo-private and ooo-users.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent:
I think it is important to appreciate that project participation on
ooo-security does require membership on the [P]PMC. The security@ apache.org
list also has oversight on ooo-security@ i.a.o.
The work on ooo-security has accountability to the PPMC. There are special
arrangements that go
I will soon need to be replaced as a moderator on ooo-users@ and ooo-private@
(requires [P]PMC member) as I unwind activities that require daily attention.
So two volunteers would be good for those list. Then there can be overlap
while they get the hang of it.
- Dennis
-Original
I think the League of Crafty Guitarists is a brilliant metaphor. Thanks Dave.
I think it might be good to notice, as well, how audiences respond as
participants in such a performance.
In pondering the question on this thread, I find that puzzling over roles may
be off the mark. I still want
repercussion.
I promise that when I mess up, I will clean it up.
You can count on it.
- Dennis
PS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdLIerfXuZ4
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10:28
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
I see two things happening on this thread: Creation of a laundry list for what
a PMC member should be. A request for PPMC members to be introspective.
I suggest that there is a single issue that, if it were addressed instead,
would unlock appreciation of what needs to be introduced in order
Some musings:
1. I notice that the cafeteria tray is getting very full with these items.
2. I wonder if using a wiki page would be better for consolidating the
consideration of traits and distinguishing what a PMC member shall bring to the
party beyond being a committer.
3. The Boy Scout
Minor correction:
The proposal is at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2012
down the list of reports in their alphabetical order.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 20:50
To:
Dave, I don't know what the baseline was for the last report, so I have no idea
what the deltas are. Where is the previous report to the IPMC?
- Dennis
PS: I may have provided that previous data, but it was a while ago [;).
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher
-dev Apache Incubator
Subject: Re: board report for Sept. 20, 2012
On Sep 3, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Dave, I don't know what the baseline was for the last report, so I have no
idea what the deltas are. Where is the previous report to the IPMC?
http://wiki.apache.org
157 total
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 14:28
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: 2012-08-02 Status: PPMC and Committer Roster
As of the end of day, 2012-08-02, the Apache OpenOffice podling
has 109 committers
There is a missing distinction here.
The discussion about signed binaries is not about external signatures of the
kind used by release managers and others, nor about the external digests and
signatures that might be obtained in conjunction with a download.
The signing of code that I am talking
@incubator.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
And so I get back to my question... How is this new requirement substantially
different from the kind of signing we do today?
And please notice the word substantially.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Dennis E
to AOO.
Just let this discussion die please without further
ado- you need not reply again here to acknowledge
my request.
From: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: j...@jagunet.com
Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 12:12
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
Since my post was mentioned later on this thread, I thought I would summarize
what I have as the take
+1 on preserving the provenance and integrity of binary dependencies.
I'd go with external signatures *and* hosting the specific artifacts on a
reliable ASF location for preservation along with all ASF project sources that
depended on those specific artifacts in any sort of review, release of
: r1377482 - /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/external_deps.lst
On Aug 26, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
+1 on preserving the provenance and integrity of binary dependencies.
I'd go with external signatures *and* hosting the specific artifacts on a
reliable ASF location
I concur with Rob's analysis here (quoted below).
It occurs to me that there is another spanner in the works. This will impact
whatever the signing process is.
Namely: Not only does the installer need to be signed, but those *installed*
components (e.g., .exe and .dll files) that can bear
I suggest that the initial Project Management Committee (PMC) needs to be
identified before the election of a Chair from that body is undertaken.
Also, this seems like a very good time to review, for the benefit of all here,
what the duties of PMC members are and, with respect to that, what the
?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed PMC Chair nomination process
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I
.
Certainly and already replied. Maybe we should just call it the once and future
PMC and stop having a silly semantic argument.
I've written what I want to say about this today and will now go back to work.
Regards,
Dave
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I
: galoppini PPMC
Pedro Giffuni : pfg PPMC
Wolf Halton : wolfhalton PPMC
Dennis E. Hamilton : orcmid PPMC
Don Harbison : dpharbison PPMC
Regina Henschel : regina PPMC
Ivo Hinkelmann : ivo PPMC
Kazunari Hirano : khirano PPMC
Martin Hollmichel : mhollmichel PPMC
Jim
+1 on prerequisites.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 09:40
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AOO Ready to Graduate
On Aug 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:43 AM,
+0 Abstain (binding)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 08:53
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but
If I log in with my Roller account, I can see the preview.
It appears that the URL is actually
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41.
- Dennis
PS: Screen with empty content is what appears any time you refer to a post in
preview that does not
It is incorrect for Andy to claim that Transitional was not part of ISO/IEC
29500 for OOXML. It was there initially and still remains part of the
specification. There has been some tidying up of the boundaries between strict
and transitional, but they have always been provided for in the
Rob is correct.
The carve-out for strict was done as he says, with it not working that way in
the original ECMA-376 (1st edition) specification that was brought to ISO/IEC
JTC1.
There were also some technical disconnects created in the way the carve-out was
executed, although my perception is
Is it similar to the way that RTF 1.6 is now frozen but there are extension
mechanisms that don't require change to the RTF specification itself?
It was startling for me to notice that RTF anticipated the functionality of
OOXML Markup Compatibility and Extensibility (MCE).
- Dennis
The proposal that Regina brought to the ODF TC is safer. It does not depend on
attempting to identify the producer. (In fact, the ODF specification says that
the generator identification is *not* to be used in this manner. It is also
unreliably used.)
The idea is to face reality and affirm
@Regina,
Thanks. I agree that the transform case needs to be taken up also. My sense
is that there is agreement that there should be transposition to SVG with
attention to migration and down-level compatibility issues.
I also agree that the situation with existing ODF 1.0/../1.2 documents
I just noticed that the document is in XLS format, though it is seen running in
OpenOffice.org Calc. (On a Mac?)
The AC/DC ASCII-art video (one I first saw in an XLS format a couple of years
ago) as done in ODS doesn't use any Windows-specific objects. The narrative
explaining how that one
loves this stuff)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 18:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Yes. You can do this with OpenOffice. (MysteryGuitarMan video with
OpenOffice Mac)
I just noticed
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Lin Yuan, yuanlin@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Sun Ying, sunying@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Stuart Swales, sswales@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Jianyuan Li, lijiany@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Khoem Sokhem, khoemsokhmen@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
Correct Apache User Name/ID:
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Khoem Sokhem, khoemsokhem@ apache.org
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 19:20
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 05:31
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: 2012-07-01 Status: PPMC and Committer Roster
As of the end of day, 2012-07-01, the Apache OpenOffice podling
has 101 committers, with 72 on the PPMC
The Apache OpenOffice PPMC announces the addition of committer
Michal Hriň, hrin@ apache.org
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache Software
Foundation:
-Original Message-
From: Armin Le Grand [mailto:armin.le.gr...@me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 02:21
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
Hi Dennis,
On 30.07.2012 22:21, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
There appear to be three considerations:
1. What is type and unit of draw:angle in the draw:gradient element?
In ODF 1.0, ODF 1.1, and ISO/IEC 26300:2006 (now aligned with ODF 1.1), the
type is integer and there is no explanation of the scale of the unit. ODF 1.2
gives special attention
I think, from the standpoint of AOO community, being an Apache committer is
probably something to leave for an ASF T-shirt, if that is ever done at all.
It might be better to leave such fine-grained details among AOO supporters and
contributors to nametags or something similar (pins or
1 - 100 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
