Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 28, 2011 3:16 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Wolf Halton wrote:
Hi Y'all
Would it be better or worse to have working-group level IRC channels?
E.g. people translating
Getting the website migrated was a major task. Congratulations.
More importantly, thank you to everyone who helped in some way.
(I trust this will be blogged)
Ross
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On 28 December 2011 20:18, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I see a number of factors related to the bug report, below:
1. The high search-result placement for a pay-for-download site
This is pretty much impossible to manage. There needs to be an attempt
to get them to
Lotus, please do conduct the kind of outreach you are talking about.
However, please now we have an official Apache blog. Let's not use another.
It would be great ifyou can wind down the previous b Blogspot gradually and
migrate people to our blog.
Ross
Sent from my mobile device, please
sorry, auto-correct messed with Louis' name
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 24, 2011 9:39 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Lotus, please do conduct the kind of outreach you are talking about.
However, please now we have an official Apache
Sorry Sally
It's just a heads up about the potential issue of multi-lingual press
releases from AOO. The first instance will be the milestone release in Q1
2012, so no rush.
Looking further into the future there may be situations when a national
group will want to do their own release.
Ross
community. We recently did this for this past week's open letter:
in addition to our usual distribution in English, it was also issued over
the newswires in German.
Hope this helps.
-Sally
[from the mobile; pls pardon spacing/spelling errors]
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler
Sent
, enjoy the days, take your own break too,
load your batteries for our next challenge in 2012.
Regards
Juergen
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
rather fond of
the idea of publishing a running account broadly titled, Voices of
Development, that presents minimally edited accounts of those actually
working on big projects.)
thanks
Louis
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http
a new point or should I
just stop dancing and let the others show their stuff.
Ross
[1]
http://io9.com/5866215/bee-swarms-behave-just-like-neurons-in-the-human-brain
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
and mentioned he had
the box with the Pootle data available. This was before we
had a running Pootle (Sorry that I am too lazy to look in
the archives ;).
Let's be patient, I am sure they will get to it.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- Mar 20/12/11, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com ha scritto
2011/12/20 Götz Wohlberg goetz.wohlb...@googlemail.com:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your kind words!
I've absorbed your email now and see all the appropriate questions
have been asked. I look forward to hearing the answers and working
with you to ensure you build the collaboration you need to realise
A big welcome. I've had quite a day today so I'm not going to respond to
your email at this point, I'm to tired to give it the attention it
deserves. Maybe others will have more time.
However, I did want to say it is great to hear from you.
We look forward to working with you.
Ross
Sent from
Since the TeamOO people have reached out to us I wonder if we can get
some comment on the status of the pootle data that we understand was
on a machine managed by TeamOO (see below)
On 17 December 2011 01:54, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 16 December 2011 17:10, Andrew Rist
if this thread is to continue can we return to the original point...
Ian: look even 15 year old schoolkids do really cool stuff
Louis: yeah, we need to empower everyone
That sounds like a great message to me. Our job is to decide how in the
future, not endlesdly debate the past
Ross
(yes, I
:
On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:29, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 15 November 2011 22:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
http://www.robweir.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/oo-forks.png
Rob. I might need to reuse this, can I assume it is OK to do so. I
don't plan to edit it in any way, just rename
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012?
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
. If I did want that then
Michaels would indeed be a better document).
Ross
S.
On Dec 17, 2011 2:53 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Thanks Simon, unfortunately the representation here, indicating the date of
the last release as the end of the line (literally
nearing a copyleft-free build milestone. What I hear - and take
this as an estimate, not a commitment -would be Q1 for a 3.4 release.
-Rob
On Dec 17, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say
On 17 December 2011 16:24, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/17/2011 05:09 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012?
...
Therefore I tent to First half 2012 when someone
On 17 December 2011 16:57, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 17, 2011 5:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011 4:13 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
It's not the relative adoption I want to show. If I did want that then
Michaels would indeed
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:25
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for the ASF to send an Open Letter?
[ ... ]
I don't want to get into marking territory, comparing size, arguing over
who
On 17 December 2011 19:50, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011 5:25 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm looking for something that shows diversity in the open document format
ecosystem.
Ah, OK. Rob's chart is unsuitable for that, as he only shows projects
On 17 December 2011 22:01, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 17 December 2011 19:25, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
Does that include converters and commercial offerings that have embedded
Lets not dive into another Us Vs Them argument, its not productive or necessary.
Clearly Robs graphic is not suitable for my purpose, neither is
Michaels. However, Simons suggestion of using the Wikipedia article is
a good one.
Ross
On 17 December 2011 22:50, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Le 17 déc. 11 à 23:26, Ross Gardler a écrit :
Lets not dive into another Us Vs Them argument, its not productive or
necessary.
Clearly Robs graphic is not suitable for my purpose,
Well, it is not that bad
On 17 December 2011 17:14, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project set a tentative release time
for OpenOffice.org Version 3.4 for the 1st Qtr of 2012.
Thanks Drew, I like that. The only problem is there is no consensus at
this point about branding/rebranding
live with
that.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 16, 2011 1:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti and...@pescetti.it wrote:
On 11/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
For the time being, we would map the existing (12) Italian lists to
- A support list, ...
- A project list, ...
If there
On 15 November 2011 22:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
http://www.robweir.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/oo-forks.png
Rob. I might need to reuse this, can I assume it is OK to do so. I
don't plan to edit it in any way, just rename it to oo-derivatives
(or similar) and move to an
On 15 November 2011 18:03, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I have been mulling this over for a long time...
Up to now, we have been reactionary. We have allowed others to
control and distort the message, paint things
On 16 December 2011 17:10, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
...
The server that
http://pootle.services.openoffice.org was hosted on was paid for by funds
from TOO (anecdotal, but I have no reason to question that). TOO has
retained physical custody of that server. I have inquired
success of the previous business models.
I was not referring to the health of the community, I was referring to
the health of previous business models.
Ross
On 15 December 2011 22:44, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 06:25:50 Ross Gardler wrote:
On 13 December 2011
that nobody is
forced off into a quiet corner where they are all alone.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
talking about community health.
I *don't* want to see unnecessary (at this time) lists (with the
emphasis on at this time).
Ross
2011/12/14 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
I'm really concerned about the tendency of the AOO project to keep
proposing and seriously considering new
On 15 December 2011 04:33, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 15.12.11 00:26, schrieb Ross Gardler:
I'm really concerned about the tendency of the AOO project to keep
proposing and seriously considering new lists (well that is probably
over stating it, but I am genuinely concerned
Michael,
I'm sorry we have failed to include you and other NL volunteers. It is
fantastic that you have found your way here. Even better that you have
de-lurked to share your story.
Please be assured that your skills and contributions are needed and
recognised here at Apache OpenOffice. That
2011 18:24, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
forum for
ecosystem activity.
Q: Would Apache be the site for that?
That all depends on what you mean by ecosystem activity. Apache
exists to produce open source software for the public good.
How nice. :-)
I mean civil
On 13 December 2011 11:33, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ross, Michael and all,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Please tell us what you need in order to continue your work and where
possible help us get it up and running
if we
could get these files visible again.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 13 December 2011 12:33, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Michael Bauer said, in another thread:
- As a matter of urgency, some simple download site where locales that got
stuck when OO Pootle went down can
On 13 December 2011 13:21, Roberto Salomon roberto.salo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ross,
There are more of us, former NL volunteers, lurking in the list.
Great to see you de-lurking. I'm sure Michael will be pleased to hear
he's not the only one. I'll bet there are a good few more.
It is good to
On 13 December 2011 14:05, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 December 2011 11:12, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm not sure where this meme of can't be done here in Apache is coming
from.
Maybe can be done in the future but not right now?
Louis original mail
On 13 December 2011 14:27, Dwayne Bailey dwa...@translate.org.za wrote:
...
From the look of it Apache might be using this server for more then just OOo
which I love even more.
The Subversion project has been using Pootle for some time. They
maintained their own instance in a VM. When AOO
On 13 December 2011 16:16, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Further points.
OOo differed from Mozilla, for instance, but resembled Eclipse in that we
accepted funds for development work. At a conference hosted by financial
firms where I represented OOo and there were
On 10 December 2011 00:53, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Saturday, 10 December 2011 10:13 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extensions and templates
On 8 December 2011 12
On 12 December 2011 23:17, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian, yes, your post was refreshingly OT :-) But not really, too, as I
think it more generally points to the need to provide a forum for
ecosystem activity.
Q: Would Apache be the site for that?
That all depends on
cleared up yet. Can anyone state that we are legally able
to take the Drupal code?
If not can someone pick this up while Gav and the growing team of
volunteers on this task look at the technical side of things.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http
I've not seen any discussion of IP management in these extensions. All
contributions would have to be made with an ICLA on file, all licenses
would have to be acceptable and releases would have to be managed properly.
Similarly development of the choose would be community led. Does the PPMC
want
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 6, 2011 9:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 12/6/11 9:07 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I've not seen any discussion of IP management in these extensions. All
contributions would have to be made
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 6, 2011 1:22 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to draw your attention to the following wiki page. It lists
the libraries that are being removed from the code, because of
incompatible licenses. It lists the
On 6 December 2011 13:56, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 6, 2011 1:22 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to draw your
On 6 December 2011 13:57, Allen Pulsifer apulsi...@apache.org wrote:
@Ross: It is my vague recollection that we have discussed OpenOffice as
being a special case with aspects new or different than the usual Apache
project, and that the project would be continuing to do binary releases,
most
In the last couple of days there had been a significant increase in name
calling and finger pointing on this list.
This is not acceptable.
Apache communities work by being open, civil and cooperative. Regardless of
other peoples actions there is no excuse for intolerance.
When replying to
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 8:05 AM, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I have no idea. But my impression was that Oracle was not withholding
any relevant
On 28 November 2011 09:48, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
I am currently a bit exhausted and would like to make some kind of a
break with ooo. I don't want to leave completely, but I want to take
the opportunity not to read so much e-mails :-) and relax a for a
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 6:43 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys;
...
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a trademark SUN owned so it was
not transferred to the
2011/11/22 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On 11/21/11 10:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Alexandro started fixing the Spanish site, but there is more to do ...
it would be interesting to know where the problem is and what the planned
changes are. There are valid concerns about the page
On 22 November 2011 11:36, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ross and all,
Shall we use native language instead of national language please?
Yes - thanks for reminding me.
Ross
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
That is not to say
into Apache software.
Greetings from
Thomas
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 20, 2011 6:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:50 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
ASF logo's are available under the Apache licence but they are also
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 20, 2011 6:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 8:27 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Quite possibly. This is the first ASF project that, as far as I am
We used to have free MSDN licenses for Apache projects. I can't remember
the details and I'm not sure if the donation is still valid. Would this
provide what is needed in a convenient way? If so I'll find or what the
status is.
Ross
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:05
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Regina Henschel
Subject: Re:Microsoft Tools for Windows Builds
We used to have free MSDN licenses for Apache
the configuration is located properly before even
attempting the build.
This may get us over some of the gnarlies that seem to be
in the way of easily setting up a Windows build. But
it is just a proof-of-concept at this point.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 19, 2011 5:22 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
(Nonsense words? iPad's spellchecker.)
-- Louis Suárez-Potts
On 2011-11-18, at 16:42, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I wouldn't even start
This is great Rob, thanks for digging it out. It probably should go on the
website.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 19, 2011 2:56 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We went through this all a couple of months ago. We processed
permission requests for
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 19, 2011 4:52 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
I think the Team OOo situation involving Fundraising that confuses brand
ownership requires some additional rules.
Fundraising that confuses brand
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 19, 2011 6:32 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 19, 2011 4:52 PM
On 19 November 2011 21:03, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Rob Weir wrote:
So you have his permission to use it. But does Apache
have his permission? And what about downstream
consumers? Although it is unlikely, we need to consider
the possibility that someone
answering the factual question, were I aware
of it at the time.
I agree, we don't need to be sympathetic in these cases. Our system does
not exclude anyone from participating.
Ross
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Thursday
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 18, 2011 7:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
...
An OpenOffice.org 3.3.1 maintenance release is *not* going to be an Apache
release, and not using any Apache code or licenses, I surmise. It will
be
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 18, 2011 9:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 18, 2011 7:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
On 17 November 2011 22:19, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:33:30 +
Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
It would help if someone told them they can post here without
subscribing and read responses via the archives (which is more
than can be said
On 15 November 2011 12:36, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
[cross posted, please be sure to only reply to your appropriate list]
Your board reports are late:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2011
On 15 November 2011 13:01, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
From what I read so far we have the following prerequisites:
- The dmake source code has to be removed from the Apache SVN repository.
In order to graduate, yes. While in the interim you have time to work
on that removal.
- The
On 15 November 2011 15:54, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 15 November 2011 12:36, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
[cross
On Tuesday, 15 November 2011, Stefane Fermigier s...@nuxeo.com wrote:
On Nov 15, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
[cross posted, please be sure to only reply to your appropriate list]
Your board reports are late:
What's the deadline ?
It's in the Wiki page I linked to:
These reports
need something that might
be seen as aggressive, if the TDF as a whole really reacted the way we
were told then such a letter may be seen as an attack on the TDF
itself, rather than an attempt to address FUD from a few.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development
On 15 November 2011 21:03, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
On 15 November 2011 18:31, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Why the AL is important for such a standard
such as Open Office and ODF;
Hey
=plugfests:200906_thehague:participants:oliver-rainer_wittmann
[4]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OpenOffice.org+Migration+Status
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 15, 2011 2:18 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you looked at what we were doing in OOo?
Errr This is OOo, right here. I'm not sure I understand your question.
If still up, you can see the
[cross posted, please be sure to only reply to your appropriate list]
Your board reports are late:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2011
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 14 November 2011 18:44, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 15, 2011 2:18 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you looked at what we were doing in OOo?
Errr This is OOo, right here
On 10 November 2011 14:53, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm. I think a list is good… but.
...
I can't give an accurate number right now, as the Web page is off. But
I'd say toward the end about 10 or so; but that was using the Web
interface, which evaded the spam effect.
of
how constructive your contributions are.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 8 November 2011 23:58, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Shane,
Le 8 nov. 11 à 23:48, Shane Curcuru a écrit :
As a mentor, I have two comments:
- When requesting a new mailing list, it is critical to clearly define the
focus and expected community that would use a list. In
source mailing list.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 9 November 2011 05:07, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
...
What I'll do is re-cast my shadow to be
representing me, Louis, in personae Louis, and if my interests and
those of Apache OOo coincide, then whoopee.
Perfect!
Thanks for understanding.
Ross
In order to graduate there can be no license incompatible code in SVN. The
solution below is ok only as an interim solution.
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 4 Nov 2011, at 15:38, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
our build tool dmake is
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 1, 2011 12:52 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 1 Nov 2011, at 00:44, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
My understanding is that this oddity came about because the
OpenOffice trademark is owned by another group (or
be created and archived if
Ohloh is not able to track two repositories (the legacy one and the
current SVN at Apache). With all its limitations (inaccurate attribution and
so on) the legacy repository is still a valuable source of information.
Perhaps hosted at apache-extras.org?
Ross
--
Ross
I want to make a couple of things clear about ASF projects (I speak with my
mentor hat on but not necessarily for other mentors):
Firstly, the ASF has many years of experience in running successful open
source projects. We even have a few failures to teach us some lessons too.
This produces a
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Oct 25, 2011 2:01 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Thank you Pedro for the very well thought out and politely presented
explanation of your point. It's very helpful to have this kind of honest
and detailed
I'd like to return this thread to the original topic.
Martin,
Have you any further thoughts on Shanes comments below (I'm aware there was
a response from you later in the thread but it got lost, I've come back to
this point to get close to the root of the thread and as far away as
possible from
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Oct 27, 2011 1:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 10/27/2011 02:03 AM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Oct 27, 2011 12:37 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m
On 19 October 2011 09:20, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a transfer of a discussion that started on the private list. It
started by considering the situation of TeamOO in relation to the ASF. Many
people over time have made small donations to TeamOO - some probably that
are
On 19 October 2011 10:01, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
snip
In other words, make every action of the PPMC as inclusive as possible.
+1
Thank you Dennis for bothering to explain
On 19 October 2011 11:09, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Nothing seems to prevent me from doing what I would want to be doing
anyway. If someone wants to set up a fund for donating directly to support
AOO I don't really see why that would be a problem either. Even if ASF
didn't
201 - 300 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
