Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread floris v
I'm not so sure that further differentiation between AOO and LO is such a good idea. The Document Foundation with LO was started because some people didn't trust Oracle. Now that the code base is being transferred to ASF, and it looks like ASF is taking its responsibility for OOo seriously

Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements

2011-09-23 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi Mathias, On 22.09.2011 22:35, Mathias Bauer wrote: Am 21.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Martin Hollmichel: Hi, Am 20.09.2011 12:26, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, [...] I will start working on a consolidation of the Windows Build software requirements as given on

[DISCUSSION] start collecting the correct content for a NOTICE.txt file

2011-09-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, for an official release we will need a NOTICE.txt file in the repository besides all other necessary changes in the code ... It may be a good idea to start working on such a file now and collect all the necessary information over time during the preparation of our first release. I've looked

Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements

2011-09-23 Thread Javier Sola
On 9/23/11 2:55 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: I am not recognizing in my mind which service packs are available for which Windows version. I am only repeating Martin here thinking that SP2 was the latest SP for Win XP. Thus, no reason special reason for Win XP SP2. My opinion is that we

Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements

2011-09-23 Thread Javier Sola
On 9/23/11 4:39 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Sp2is still widely used and installed in low specs computers in developing countries where no licensed copies of MS exist (and where the use of unlicensed copies of software is not illegal). These computers are a part of OOo's market. Sorry if I am

Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements

2011-09-23 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Yes you are missing something ;-) You are assuming here that MS Windows is better than OpenOffice. In this case it is a wrong assumption. Oooh, good for OOo then. --tml

Re: Buildbreaker on Mac

2011-09-23 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 22.09.2011 20:03, Raphael Bircher wrote: I was making two update of the AOOo Source tree today. The Build from this morning was succesfull. But this evening after the commit from hdu (I think the one for alg) I have had a build braker. Here is the Log: http://pastebin.com/dLSfn9vS

Re: opendocument-users discussion list at OASIS

2011-09-23 Thread Devin Han
I have subscribed. Thanks for sharing this list, Rob. It will be helpful for me to enhance my skills and knowledge. 2011/9/23 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org We have an OASIS mailing, opendocument-us...@oasis-open.org, to provide an open forum for developers to exchange ideas and information on

Re: [DISCUSSION] start collecting the correct content for a NOTICE.txt file

2011-09-23 Thread Rob Weir
2011/9/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, for an official release we will need a NOTICE.txt file in the repository besides all other necessary changes in the code ... It may be a good idea to start working on such a file now and collect all the necessary information over time

Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:39 AM, floris v floris...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not so sure that further differentiation between AOO and LO is such a good idea. The Document Foundation with LO was started because some people didn't trust Oracle. Now that the code base is being transferred to ASF, and

Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread Fernand Vanrie
On 23/09/2011 15:28, Rob Weir wrote: We don't want to upset that. On the other hand, most of our potential users are using MS Office, and they have radically changed their UI... Yes, with many pro's and con's but we still have the 1 milion question: Must aOO or/and LO be a copy of the MS

Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread Fernand Vanrie
On 23/09/2011 15:28, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:39 AM, floris vfloris...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not so sure that further differentiation between AOO and LO is such a good idea. The Document Foundation with LO was started because some people didn't trust Oracle. Now that the code

Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Fernand Vanrie s...@pmgroup.be wrote: On 23/09/2011 15:28, Rob Weir wrote: We don't want to upset that. On the other hand, most of our potential users are using MS Office, and they have radically changed their UI... Yes, with many pro's and con's but we

Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7

2011-09-23 Thread Chao Huang
Another request to build AOOo on 10.7 is to solve the special issue on Mac 10.7. 2011/9/23 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: hi, Nakata The latested Mac machine can not install 10.6 and 10.5. So if I want to debug AOOo on that machine, I have to pass the full build on 10.7 firstly. Apple

Re[2]: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org

2011-09-23 Thread Yakov Reztsov
22 сентября 2011, 20:29 от Pedro F. Giffuni: HunSpell is copyleft so we cannot include it.  Hi! Hunspell is C++ library under GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license. (http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/). What license is required for dictionaries in AOOo? Can you include Russian spellcheck dictionary in

Re: Re[2]: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org

2011-09-23 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Hi Yakov; --- On Fri, 9/23/11, Yakov Reztsov yakovr...@mail.ru wrote: 22 сентября 2011, 20:29 от Pedro F. Giffuni: HunSpell is copyleft so we cannot include it.  Hi! Hunspell is  C++ library under GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license.  (http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/).

Re: Starting a conversation on AOOo 4.0

2011-09-23 Thread Guy Waterval
Hello, 2011/9/23 Shao Zhi Zhao zhaos...@cn.ibm.com hi, IBM symphony will contribute to Apache, it has good UI,it will be fit to your requirement. I know, I use Symphony and it's really a piece of cake. Many thanks for the great job. gw

Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7

2011-09-23 Thread Maho NAKATA
default installation of Lion on many machines are 64bit. OOo for MacOSX is intended to be 32bit. this point is also important notice. thanks 2011/9/24 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: Another request to build AOOo on 10.7 is to solve the special issue on Mac 10.7. 2011/9/23 Chao Huang

Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements

2011-09-23 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 23.09.2011 09:55, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Maybe you mixed unicows.dll with the notorious uwinapi.dll that at least has some value on WinXP, though it's unclear how much. Hm... Why do you think I am mixing unicows.dll with uwinapi.dll? I replied to Martin. :-) Regards, Mathias

[LINUX-BUILD] problem with unoxml

2011-09-23 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi all, I'm still working on a build on Fedora 15 x86-64. ooo svn rev 1174459 I'm broken on unoxml. How can I get better error information because the error below isn't very descriptive? Background is I'm building using: autoconf ./configure ./bootstrap source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh cd

Re: LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later

2011-09-23 Thread Shane Curcuru
(Resend; if any moderator spots my previous version from a gmail account please kill it; I try to only use my asf@ address for Apache work - thanks!) How to say this... whenever dealing with the press (either credentialed or just prominent blogger/news site), the first thing to do is be polite

Re: [DISCUSSION] start collecting the correct content for a NOTICE.txt file

2011-09-23 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Hello juergen; I think the file should be named NOTICE (without the .txt extension): https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/ Cheers, Pedro.

Press requests (was: LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later)

2011-09-23 Thread Shane Curcuru
I'd recommend that folks contact the Apache press team in the future if there are articles in the press that the project has issues with (or, things we'd like to highlight in @TheASF or the Foundation blog): http://www.apache.org/press/ pr...@apache.org is a privately archived list, and has

Re: [LINUX-BUILD] problem with unoxml

2011-09-23 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hello Carl, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:19:09PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: How can I get better error information because the error below isn't very descriptive? Background is I'm building using: autoconf ./configure ./bootstrap source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh cd instsetoo_native build

Re: [LINUX-BUILD] problem with unoxml

2011-09-23 Thread Carl Marcum
Ariel, Thank you for your help. On 09/23/2011 10:32 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hello Carl, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:19:09PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: How can I get better error information because the error below isn't very descriptive? Background is I'm building using: autoconf

Re: [LINUX-BUILD] problem with unoxml

2011-09-23 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hello Carl, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:40:56PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: This time with ./configure --enable-verbose and cd instsetoo_native build --all --html It appears no destination is called after $O/lib/libsaxlx.so in the cp command. output from

Re: [LINUX-BUILD] problem with unoxml

2011-09-23 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 01:12:18AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: I can see that error too. This is the problem: * the sax module is a dependency of unoxml, see unoxml/prj/build.lst * solver/340/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libsaxlx.so does not exist, though it should have been built in sax