Hi Andrea
We japanese team have just published its translation.
cf.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ja/news/graduation.html
http://www.openoffice.org/ja/news/graduation.html (not yet up)
Thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
In the first three months after graduation a project is supposed to
report to the Board on a monthly basis. So our reports will be due in
November 2012, in December 2012, and then on a quarterly basis
(Jan-Apr-Jul-Oct).
I started a first draft of this month's report (which is still using the
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Maho NAKATA m...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Andrea
We japanese team have just published its translation.
cf.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ja/news/graduation.html
http://www.openoffice.org/ja/news/graduation.html (not yet
On the help files, you find numbers written like
1.79769313486232 x 10E308
This is wrong: it should be either
1.79769313486232 x 10^308
or
1.79769313486232E308
what do you think?
Regards
Ricardo
RGB ES wrote:
On the help files, you find numbers written like
1.79769313486232 x 10E308
This is wrong: it should be either
1.79769313486232 x 10^308
or
1.79769313486232E308
what do you think?
Yes, it's wrong and your first proposal is correct and more readable
than the second one. Then I
It appears that all three forms are correct as notations for the same numerical
value where . is recognized as a decimal point.
I agree that there should be consistency.
I think context of the numeral is important. In particular, which is most
likely to be easily recognized and understood
May I politely as a mathematician point out that there is a major
difference in the 2 proposals.
Number 1 is a mathematical expression whereas number 2 is a number.
Now I do not know where it is used, but if I copy both suggestions into
Calc, it believes it is text.
Should we not have a format
ups, our calc does not like . if it is setup for e.g. en-GB, so actually
calc accepted the second notation if I changed it to ,
Would it be possible to have a macro or something for . so it appears in
, for me . signals 1000 (1.000)
Jan.
On 3 November 2012 18:29, Dennis E. Hamilton
On 2 November 2012 20:34, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On 11/2/12, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2012 08:40, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM
2012/11/3 jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
May I politely as a mathematician point out that there is a major
difference in the 2 proposals.
Number 1 is a mathematical expression whereas number 2 is a number.
I'm physicist :)
The first number is the traditional scientific notation
I believe the original comment is about documentation of the Basic language
used with OpenOffice.
See https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121307.
In those cases, the correct notation (with multiplication sign and exponents)
is shown in some languages for the page and different
When it is in the part that is being translated localizers will take care
of , versus ..
I know the x10 is a scientific notation and I use it and like it, but
since our calc does not accept it, I would prefer the E notation, so people
does not get confused.
Jan.
On 3 November 2012 19:14, RGB ES
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be
El 03/11/2012 19:25, jan iversen escribió:
When it is in the part that is being translated localizers will take care
of , versus ..
I know the x10 is a scientific notation and I use it and like it, but
since our calc does not accept it, I would prefer the E notation, so people
does not get
LGTM, thanks!
Regards,
Dave
On Nov 3, 2012, at 1:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
In the first three months after graduation a project is supposed to report to
the Board on a monthly basis. So our reports will be due in November 2012, in
December 2012, and then on a quarterly basis
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
In the first three months after graduation a project is supposed to report
to the Board on a monthly basis. So our reports will be due in November
2012, in December 2012, and then on a quarterly basis (Jan-Apr-Jul-Oct).
Kay Schenk wrote:
... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2012+Nov
Feel free to edit it. It should cover September 2012 and October 2012.
Good that you put it on the wiki. When is the due date?
I received no deadline, since officially we only report on
Jan-Apr-Jul-Oct and
Hi Galileo,
you are welcome.
Galileo Teco Juárez schrieb:
hi i am new .. my name is Galileo. I am Chiapas Mexico
I join the list of partners to contribute to the OpenOffice Suite as part
of my university course.
I have knowledge in: Java, C, C + +, GNU / Linux, Windows XD, other things.
I
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2012+Nov
Feel free to edit it. It should cover September 2012 and October 2012.
Good that you put it on the wiki. When is the due date?
I
20 matches
Mail list logo
