Is there a convention among Apache projects or podlings for where their have
their IRC channels and what they are named?
-Rob
Our website link is: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
Astute observers may notice that nothing is there. I'd like to get a basic
podling web site up there ASAP, so we can put out the welcome mat, have a
place to report status and accomplishments, list committers, etc. As we get
an
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang communities,
teams, mailing lists, websites
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:09, Pedro Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:59:12 +0200, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net
...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that nowhere in the
code
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you understand, that due to the nature of OOo it always
had very strong language specific communities, wich significantly
contributed to the huge success of OOo?
Interfering with the habits and cultures
/
for the markdown sources. The way to get everything
into svn is to add them to the ooo tree the way
you would any other code. Once the basic tree is
established, file an INFRA Jira ticket to enable
the CMS webgui and publishing facilities.
- Original Message
From: Rob Weir apa
would any other code. Once the basic tree is
established, file an INFRA Jira ticket to enable
the CMS webgui and publishing facilities.
- Original Message
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 4:18:49 PM
Subject: Re: Podling
Message
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 8:39:43 PM
Subject: Re: Podling website - Access Denied
Same thing here. I'm ready to check in the whole site. But I get this
error when committing:
access to '/repos/asf/!svn
I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
service with how Apache projects work.
Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
representing the project,or at the very least is a member of the
project. But we speak as individuals, both in the project and
Could you say a little about subprojects and how they work at
Apache? Are they the same as components? Do they have their own
PMCs and their own list of committers?
-Rob
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob,
And then there are other functions
I sidenav.mdtext we specify links like this:
- [Get Involved](get-involved.html)
- [Mailing Lists](mailing-lists.html)
- [People](people.html)
We could make those be absolute URL's like:
- [Get Involved](http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/get-involved.html)
- [Mailing
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:24 AM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Even for a wiki ?
I won't sign any *LA. Sorry, I was wrong to believe it could be possible to
contribute without sign that.
Note that this is not a copyright aggregation agreement like
Sun/Oracle had. Have you read the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Can you provide any supporting data? Having some canonical metrics
would also help in evaluating the future code rewrite that will have to
be done at Apache.
Did OOo have a specialized performance team? Are
remark) and start with those from the current ICU instead?
Regards,
Mathias
On 21.06.2011 13:59, Rob Weir wrote:
ICU is open source today: http://site.icu-project.org/
The license is the ICU License:
http://source.icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/license.html
According to the ICU web
Now that we have the support of a wiki for planning, I've tried to put
a little structure around the plan, defining some project milestones
and functional areas:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home
Each combination of milestone and functional area links to its own
Now that we have the support of a wiki for planning, I've tried to put
a little structure around the plan, defining some project milestones
and functional areas:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home
Each combination of milestone and functional area links to its own
Hi Mathias,
Would it be possible to get the list of 3rd party modules and their
current status up on the wiki? Discussions should remain on the
list, I think. But if the module list is up on the wiki, along with
status, then we can do some of the analysis in parallel.
Hi Ian,
Any luck raising the trademark issue with Apache Branding?
-Rob
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Thanks, Ian.
I don't see anything in the Apache trademark policy [1] that talks
about training certificates. But it does say that use
the list into the Ooo wiki some days ago:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#Regexp
For the files we already treated on the list, the status is there also.
Feel free to move to the apache wiki what you see fit.
Regards,
Mathias
On 22.06.2011 15:42, Rob Weir wrote
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Grzegorz Rajda melloned...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening,
All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key Schenk. I
wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What You think about
that?
Last changes in infrastructure (Oracle,
dave2w...@comcast.net:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Grzegorz Rajda melloned...@gmail.com
wrote:
Good evening,
All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key Schenk. I
wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development
I appreciate that. But I also suspect that with 1,000 change
notifications per day, no oversight at all will occur.
So given the scale of the anticipated wiki, how do we get the maximum
actual oversight?
-Rob
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
I also appreciate these conversations but I get a feeling we are inventing
the wheel from scratch. Most of the questions regarding QA, Testing,
Documentation, and such where already documented. So I wonder if the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
In light of this conversation I am changing the proposal to this:
For both the Community Forum (OOOUSER) and the Developer Forum (OOODEV) I now
propose sending an email with a daily digest to ooo-commits@incubator.a.o.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rob, * -- see below
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Since almost all of us are new to Apache we're learning a lot about
how Apache projects organize themselves. Based on my
Good job, both.
My little mystery was trying to figure out why SVN was not letting me
apply the patch. Then I figured it out. The patch had already been
applied. ;-)
Perhaps a convention in the future would be that the committer who
wants to review and merge a patch first claims the patch on
, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Better to let subversion resolve coordination problems than to put up
obstructions to jfdi, IMO.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Good job, both.
My little mystery was trying to figure out why
, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
How? By locking the files that are being patched while doing the
review? Would that have really told the 2nd reviewer anything?
Locking only prevents me from committing by working copy. It doesn't
prevent me from applying a patch to my working copy, right
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think this is extremely important and I'm embarrassed that I missed it.
I'm also thinking that we need an ooo-user list pretty soon.
In the incubation proposal we said that we would not be requesting a
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Does anyone see a difference other than the obvious difference of
technology, between the OOo user list and the forums? Are they being
used for different kinds of things? Or are they just different
Do we know how many language-specific user lists we have at OOo today?
Not forums, but user mailing lists.
-Rob
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Yes, IMHO we must have user mailing lists for their native languages.
Otherwise we cannot bring them
From a user's perspective, maximum satisfaction comes from not having
a question in the first place. The product just works intuitively.
They don't need to interrupt their task to find out 'How do I do X?.
If they need to search for an answer to a question, the product has
already failed them,
Thanks for the list. I looked around. Some lists are very active.
Some have not seen activity for a year or more. Some seem to never
have been active. And some are just full of spam :-(
I can see three ways to decide what to do (but maybe someone has other ideas?):
1) Recreate the structure
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Thanks for the list. I looked around. Some lists are very active.
Some have not seen activity for a year or more. Some seem to never
have
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
.
.
.
(I have no idea where learning the ropes comes from. What is the
expression in your part of the world?)
This is a nautical term. A new sailor would need to learn the rigging
of the ship, as well as
I like the idea of using ODF, for the reasons you state.
I assuming this implies ODF files in the SVN repository. If so, we're
going to have three pain points:
1) Since ODF is not a text format, diff's are not possible with the
default SVN tools. Yes, we can do change tracking inside of the
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
I like the idea of using ODF, for the reasons you state.
I assuming this implies ODF files in the SVN repository. If so, we're
going to have three pain points:
1) Since ODF is not a text format
Assuming we're not trying for a big bang migration where we move
everything at once, it seems we have two main approaches:
1) Assign existing OpenOffice.org DNS to Apache now. For services
which we have not yet migrated to Apache we redirect back to Oracle's
server, by IP address. As additional
Do we have any detailed access logs or reports for OOo? I think that
would be useful for prioritizing service migration, decided what to
archive versus what to keep alive, etc. I've heard a lot of anecdotal
stories, but hard data is good to get the complete picture.
If it would be possible to
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Just in case other folks missed the tie-in between the different threads:
branding and trademark policy for all Apache projects is handled on the
privately archived tradema...@apache.org mailing list. Apache policy is
that you are already doing. But in that case I think it would help if
we had a roadmap for the next couple of weeks, of what tasks
remains, so others can help as well.
-Rob
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
On 27.06.2011 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
I
Let me state my assumptions, which might be incorrect, but I think it
is worth being explicit, so my errors can be more easily corrected.
Apache projects make releases. These releases consist at least of
tarballs containing source code. The contents of releases must be
consist only of files
Let me summarize what I'm hearing the initial steps then are.
1) We take the OOo source code with tag OOO340_m1 from
hg.services.openoffice.org, including the full history, and convert
that into a SVN repository, e.g.,: hg convert --dest-type svn
hgreponame svnreponame
Who does this? Is
Is there markdown text for tables? I looked around and did not find anything.
-Rob
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Alexandro Colorado
j...@openoffice.orgwrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Rob Weir apa
with preview?
-Rob
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Is there markdown text for tables? I looked around and did not find
anything.
MoinMoin uses an ascii art-like, googling I found many
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
It might help to be explicit
Welcome to the project, Mouette.
It is good to see that we have a Solaris expert here, to help with that port.
We also have BSD members, and of course Windows and Linux.
But do we have a Mac programmer on board?
-Rob
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:47 PM, L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be useful to make a distinction between two things:
1) What is needed to have a successful first build?
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Build-Translate-Plan)
2) What is needed to have a successful first release?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Right. Maybe we should split this into 2 parts:
1. The very first build(s) to handle fixes for build breaker:
IMHO here it should be enough to have
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This sounds great Donald. No worries about being new to the ASF, I'm
really wanting someone with some history with OOo that can talk about
why you (not your employer) felt that Apache was chosen as the final
home.
Just noticed that we had project members from North America, South
America, Europe, Asia and Australia. So 5 of 7 continents.
I have doubts that we'll get anyone from Antarctica.
But I thought there was strong interest in OpenOffice in South Africa,
especially with their many official
ask Aslam Raffee. He used to be on the OASIS ODF Adoption TC.
On Jun 29, 2011 5:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 06/29/2011 11:08 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Just noticed that we had project members from North America, South
America, Europe, Asia and Australia. So 5 of 7
Alexandro, were the posts sent to the list today just queued up and
eventually delivered? Or did they bounce during the outage?
-Rob
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
Got my email back, thanks for the updates.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM,
Hello Jin Hua. Welcome to the Apache OpenOffice project.
I see that you already have an Apache ID. This is good.
Could you add a row for yourself to this page:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html
Instructions for editing the webpage are here:
When we process new committers, we're asking them for a list of
preferred userids? Why is that so? Is that just in case there is a
conflict? (But that should be trivial to prevent by having them look
at the list of Apache ID's initially). Or are they set up with userid
aliases?
-Rob
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
of migration.
I'm also hearing some say that JIRA is superior.
I'm not really persuaded by either argument. I wonder if we could
briefly drill down into this
What Andy said, as well as:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy
-Rob
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to participate in the OOo project.
I'm a programmer and documentation editor.
Ted
A
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket.
Tel：(86-10)51570010-6150
email：hanshuw...@redoffice.com,hanshuw...@tsinghua.org.cn
MSN: han_shuw...@hotmail.com
Address:2F HuiLongSen Tower A,18 Xihuan South Road, YiZhuang
Economic and Technological Develop Zone, Daxing District, Beijing,
China.
--
*发件人：* Rob
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
I understand that the necessary code reorganization in the Apache
project will forbid a public release for months.
Aside from the obvious technical tasks of producing code, translation
and documentation, a release
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 3 Jul 2011, at 19:43, Ross Gardler wrote:
But before we can
get to that point we need to address the technical differences between
the two code bases. LO is already 8 months or so adrift of OOo (or at
least that is
Mentors, how is this report typically handled by the PPMC? Can a PPMC
member just draft it and seek lazy consensus to submit? Or does this
require an explicit PPMC vote?
-Rob
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Dear OpenOffice.org Developers,
This email was sent by
Java projects that move to Apache have a similar issue. They often
convert from their pre-existing package structure to an org.apache.foo
structure. Not sure if that is mandatory or not, but they seem to
like to converge on an Apache namespace.
But I think XML namespaces are different, since
: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 05:51
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Uh oh: OpenOffice.org XML Namespaces and Sun Mediatypes
Java projects that move to Apache have a similar issue. They often
convert from their pre
why not let the discussions happen wherever, including here?
- Original Message
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 4, 2011 9:32:34 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
IMHO, if we're discussing a non-Apache
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
In general I avoid commenting threads like this, as in my
POV the licensing differences are not surmountable..
It is hard to tell whether 100% of TDF developers insist on copyleft.
Certainly there is a vocal
I'd like to help move this discussion forward. I'm not perceiving any
*strong* opinions on the Bugzilla versus JIRA question. But I am
hearing several suggest that JIRA is a better tracker (custom
dashboards in particular were called out). Bugzilla got some nods for
the ease of migration and
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
I'd like to explore the technical feasibility of migrating
to JIRA.
+1
I see this page here describing the migration from JIRA's
perspective:
http
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 05.07.11 18:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
I'd like to help move this discussion forward. I'm not perceiving any
*strong* opinions on the Bugzilla versus JIRA question. But I am
hearing several suggest that JIRA is a better
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Graham Lauder wrote:
Much of what is on there is legacy material that could be seriously
pruned. For instance all the old Marketing
We extend our congratulations to Jean Hollis Weber (jeanweber), who
was recently voted in as a Committer and PPMC-member for the project.
Jean was noted for her diligence and participation especially in the
area of user documentation.
-The Apache OpenOffice PPMC
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 05.07.11 19:12, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Raphael Bircherr.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 05.07.11 18:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
I'd like to help move this discussion forward. I'm not perceiving any
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 05.07.11 19:37, schrieb Dave Fisher:
Mark Thomas is the person on the Apache Infrastructure group who stepped
up as the contact when I asked infrastructure if they had an opinion in our
first few days.
Would someone
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Clayton,
I am separating into two sub-topics:
(1) IDL Generation.
Thanks for the link to what the Wiki uses to create a short hand for various
IDL links. This points out a very important topic that needs to be
on the Incubation PMC to add you as a
committer to this podling.
-Rob
thegurkha
On 28/06/11 20:03, Rob Weir wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html
I've updated the page to have a table rather than just a flat list.
Every committer should add themselves to the list
This page here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
Is this something that the Podling PMC should be updating? Or is this
for the Mentors? Or is does anyone even look at this?
There are some items that appear to be be done, but are not yet give
dates. And the form
I've drafted the report directly on the wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2011
Since the Board meeting is the 20th, and they need one-week to review,
we need final sign off by the 13th.
I will be out all next week starting the 12th. So if we can reach
consensus on this and get a
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
[I am reminded that the best way to talk to the PPMC is on ooo-dev and there
is benefit in so doing. Here goes.]
PROPOSAL
ooo-security@incubator.a.o be set up as a private list and a selection of not
more than 10
as a
deliverable from the ASF.
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 17:10, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Would it be worth considering using DITA for the documentation/help?
I love ODF as much as anyone, but DITA was designed specifically for
technical documentation, and has built-in facilities
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
On 06.07.2011 18:58, Greg Stein wrote:
The development process that OOo used to use, as I understand it,
looks incredibly heavyweight and slow moving. At Apache, you commit
your changes. If you have a large-ish feature
an ad-hoc one used by only us.
Dave
On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Would it be worth considering using DITA for the documentation/help?
I love ODF as much as anyone, but DITA was designed specifically for
technical documentation, and has built-in facilities for making
modular
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
we've already done the work
of converting much of the OOo help to DITA.
Is there a software grant coming?
It is worth considering. But I'm not going to face
...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 14:40
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Creation of ooo-security List
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
[I am reminded that the best
what I can. (does anyone know who used to collect the stats for
OOo?)
Andrew
On 6/27/2011 5:33 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Do we have any detailed access logs or reports for OOo? I think that
would be useful for prioritizing service migration, decided what to
archive versus what to keep alive
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 6 Jul 2011, at 23:19, Rob Weir wrote:
I think we're transitioning from a formally coordinated model led by a
corporation to a model that will have less formal coordination
structures. This is necessary to grow
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Frank Peters fpe.mli...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rob,
Would it be worth considering using DITA for the documentation/help?
[...]
I'd like to argue for the advantages of DITA as a source format here.
I can probably find some volunteers to help enabled this. The
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 18:08, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
That was user guides. I'm talking about help documentation, though
the DITA approach could certainly handle user guides with ease as
well.
And remember, there is more than one doc team to consider here. And
once of them would
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
As this list knows i will be speaking at the 6th ODF Plugfest on what
it means to OOo to be in the Apache Incubator. Since I am only a
mentor and not a committer my presentation will focus on the Apache
Way rather
Bringing the threads together on the public list so we can (hopefully)
quickly discuss.
As I understand it now, the OpenOffice.org currently directs visitors
to report vulnerability reports to securityt...@openoffice.org. This
address is currently being monitored.
And at Apache we ask
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:01 AM, theUser BL theuse...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi!
What is the advantage of the Apache OpenOffice.org Fork?
Currently there are two point of views what a OOo fork is and what not.
If you look at the trademark and logo, then LibreOffice is the fork.
But if you
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Hi Donald, Ross, all,
Am 07.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Donald Harbison:
[...]
The end of a corporate controlled project, and the beginning of two new
open
source projects
[...]
I would like to change this part of
We've received some criticism from our Mentors for using the private
list too eagerly. I'm certainly guilty in that. I think the key
thing is that the private list is for discussing matters that require
privacy, but that this does not include discussing procedures around
privacy and
of executive session.
Although there are exceptions, most elected officials in Massachusetts
behave like adults, even when they need to declare why they are
conducting business in private.
-Original Message-
From: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
Sent
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Jerry Kemp sun.mail.lis...@oryx.cc wrote:
One of the reasons I have stuck with OO and have not looked further into
LO was the fact that binaries were not provided for my preferred
desktop, Solaris. Specifically, I primarily use either OpenSolaris
Nevada or
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:48 PM, luizh...@gmail.com luizh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Brazilian community [1] still maintains a minimum structure of support
to users of OOo/Libo. I forwarded the questions that come to help single
list in Brazil [2]. But, this week someone from the list of TDF
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission?
I'm interesting in knowing how many people are currently subscribed,
especially a sense of the ratio of lurkers to active participants,
contributors to users, etc. This could be one indication
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission?
On another thread and list I saw this:
Email ooo-dev-help@ from your
follow our progress.
Regards,
Dave
## Manfred - (android) mobil - please excuse typos Am 08.07.2011 15:53
schrieb Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way for list moderators to get a tally of list subscribers?
Or is this an admin permission
Is there an editor role? I may not do much original blogging here,
but I could help with editing posts.
I'd also recommend that we adopt some goals for the blog (community
outreach, etc.) and set up an editorial calendar of planned future
posts.
-Rob
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Gavin
1 - 100 of 2798 matches
Mail list logo
