[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Features and defaults and navigation (was: [Bug 1261939] Re: Add per-library TPAC pages with schema.org structured data support)

2014-01-22 Thread Dan Scott
I've forwarded comments from Dan Wells on bug # 1261939 around merging a new feature; and instead of responding in the bug (which is now closed), I've put my thoughts below that. There's a mix of discussion around whether new features should be on by default, as well as design how navigation in

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Features and defaults and navigation (was: [Bug 1261939] Re: Add per-library TPAC pages with schema.org structured data support)

2014-01-22 Thread Dan Wells
Hello all, Thanks, Dan, for bringing this to the list. It is a better place to have the discussion, I think. I don’t have a lot to add beyond the original post, but do wish to clarify a couple of my views. As far as I know slam dunk criteria has never been formally applied to any previous

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Features and defaults and navigation (was: [Bug 1261939] Re: Add per-library TPAC pages with schema.org structured data support)

2014-01-22 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote: As far as I know slam dunk criteria has never been formally applied to any previous changesets. Perhaps we should formalize how we make such decisions and apply it consistently for _all_ new features, otherwise conflict,