Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Rethinking the release process: (was: Trac usage, EG Versions)

2009-09-14 Thread Joe Atzberger
I agree that time-based releases would be dependent on: - fuller coverage of automated tests, - a explicitly executable if not automated upgrade path, - and a more automated (basically easier) release process. Defining categories and pairing people to them as default assignees is very

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Rethinking the release process: (was: Trac usage, EG Versions)

2009-09-14 Thread James Fournie
Thanks Joe and Dan for your great comments. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joe Atzberger jatzber...@esilibrary.com wrote: I agree that time-based releases would be dependent on: fuller coverage of automated tests, a explicitly executable if not automated upgrade path, and a more automated

[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Rethinking the release process: (was: Trac usage, EG Versions)

2009-09-11 Thread Dan Scott
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 20:24 -0400, Joe Atzberger wrote: I'm looking to formally record in Trac the various bugs encountered during development and testing. Right now, the number of EG Versions to file against are a small subset of the actual number of available versions (plus 2.0 that doesn't