Hi,
Pucky Loucks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in the public beta testing of the EC2 Service from Amazon and I've tried
to get openafs installed on an instance, but I'm having issues.
Here is my post on the EC2 Forum. http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/
Rich Sudlow wrote:
What's the best replacement for the old AFS rsh and
Transarc inetd which does token passing?
I'm using this in a Linux cluster environment so speed is
fairly important - and I'd prefer something as easy to
setup as the old rsh.
If this is a cluster, and speed is the
(openafs 1.4.2, kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6, dynroot)
Not sure if this is common to all openafs 1.4.2, or fedora core 6,
since I've only tried it on fc6, but I noticed an odd value for 'df':
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
AFS 137Y 0 137Y 0% /afs
(I
Hi,
In my /usr/afs/etc/ThisCell I didn't have a new line character or had
a bad character after the cell name. After I re-created ThisCell
file it started without any problem.
Thanks / Erland
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick J
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone have any experience using legato networker to back up afs
volumes? We would like to switch from vos dump all volumes to an extra
raid array -backups to using legato (since that's the de facto backup
solution around here). What's the best
Well, that's definitely broken. Use of -localauth shouldn't have
affected this; it should figure out what the cell is
from /etc/openafs/ThisCell and then look up the servers
from /etc/openafs/CellServDB and it sounds like it's not doing that
properly.
Well, I've not seen this problem
Juha =?UTF-8?B?SsOkeWtrw6Q=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
...
Well, that's definitely broken. Use of -localauth shouldn't have
affected this; it should figure out what the cell is
from /etc/openafs/ThisCell and then look up the servers
from /etc/openafs/CellServDB and it sounds like it's
Title: Re: [OpenAFS] cofiguring OpenAFS on Xen
HI Derek,
Where did you get this RPM?
I built it i.e. rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 openafs-1.4.2-src.rpm
How did it get there? Did you put it there yourself or did it get
there by an RPM? What do you get from:
rpm -qf
Title: RE: Re: [OpenAFS] cofiguring OpenAFS on Xen
I just got the latest openafs-kernel-1.4.2-2.6.16_xenU_1.i686.rpm installed and dmesg is now giving me a different error.
Remember I'm in a CentOS instance on XEN.
openafs: version magic '2.6.16-xenU SMP 686 gcc-4.1' should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pam_krb5afs in RedHat (I think RHEL4 or later) works around this
issue by introducing a use_shmem flag so that they can communicate
between processes.
use_shmem=sshd never enabled me to obtain an AFS token during a GSSAPI
session. Two methods I've verified to work
(openafs 1.4.2, kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6, dynroot)
Not sure if this is common to all openafs 1.4.2, or fedora core 6,
since I've only tried it on fc6, but I noticed an odd value for 'df':
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
AFS 137Y 0 137Y 0% /afs
On Sunday, October 29, 2006 09:42:37 AM -0500 Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At one time we were trying to get afsd to auto-tune so that the various
options for different cache sizes would not be needed. If the current
auto-tuning isn't good enough, maybe someone should work on it some
However, that doesn't help you if you insist on passing explicit values on
the command line, as is done by the startup scripts included with several
of the binary packages.
Yes, that's exactly my point. I would like to see the platform maintainers
remove these overrides. I have done so
On 10/31/06, Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, October 29, 2006 09:42:37 AM -0500 Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At one time we were trying to get afsd to auto-tune so that the various
options for different cache sizes would not be needed. If the current
auto-tuning
Title: RE: Re: [OpenAFS] cofiguring OpenAFS on Xen
got it working, followed what was done in the following thread.
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2006-April/013777.html
-Original Message-
From: Pucky Loucks
Sent: Tue 10/31/2006 12:08 PM
To: Pucky Loucks;
On Monday, October 30, 2006 07:12:10 PM -0500 Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a security hole to allow anyone with write access to gain
administrative priviledges just through mkdir.
Well, you only gain bits with respect to the thing you created, so no,
that's not really a
Thanks for the feedback. I can understand the reasoning behind the
different rationale; our dependency is approximately as follows- if
you or anyone else have any thoughts about duplicating the
functionality we had previously inside the context of the new
semantics it would be grand. If
So just be be 100% clear, to turn autotune on, all you need to do is
start up afsd without any of these options: -stat, -dcache,
-daemons, -volumes, -chucksize?
That's right. You can find out what the values got auto-tuned to with
cmdebug -cache.
Does auto-tuning work only for disk
Bill Stivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In essence, we have a homework submission system in which volumes are
created by class. Owners and TAs have full access and all
privileges. system:authuser has rli permissions. In the past, our
script would create a directory inside the homework
19 matches
Mail list logo
